Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Mrs Chris Thomas (RAS 33)

BACKGROUND

  1.  Born in South Wales Valleys, to a family of farmers (but not my parents) paid for myself to go through agricultural college. Married, five children, we farm 300 owned acres plus additional 350 rented. 700 beef cattle producing prime finished beef. I do all tractor work, ie ploughing (250 acres/year), cultivations, bailing etc. I do cattle paperwork and campsite paperwork. Geraint and Charlie (our oldest daughter (18)) do all husbandry work, construction work etc. We cannot afford to employ anyone, other than contractors to plant maize and fencing. I came 2nd to Welsh Woman farmer of the year 2004, we hosted the Welsh National Ploughing Match 2005.

  2.  Farming is my passion, it's my life and my love, I would not and could not ever think of not farming, but we must all accept change. "Farming is not just a job, it's a way of life"—How many times have we heard that, and yet, if current policy trends continue, it will be a way of life for very few in future years.

  3.  Farming is not something which can be learnt just from books, it is bred into you—it is in the fibre of your genes.…Yet, in as much as it could be bred in—it can be bred out too.

  4.  Who will be farming our countryside in 50 years time? One of my most serious concerns for agriculture is the total lack of foresight regards looking after and nurturing the younger generations. With "pure agricultural courses" being swallowed up, and replaced by "diversifications qualifications" I worry, are there enough fully qualified and properly bred young people to take over custody of the land?

  5.  Farming is being pummelled and moulded into an "ideal formula" by this Government and this cannot be done with any future thought. For far too long we have had ministers put in charge of this most specialist subject—ministers who have no practical, emotional and mental needs of agriculture and its workforce.

  6.  One of my all-time favourite lecturers in agricultural college had a great saying—"Common sense is a sense not common to everyone", and I feel this is very true regarding the policy makers of today's agricultural industry.

  7.  Take the Single Farm Payment. This whole fiasco has been turned into nothing more than an enormous white elephant—its purpose was two fold, to remove payments linked to production, and to encourage the older generation to retire and pave the way for a new and younger workforce. The reality could not be more different, or further from the truth.

  8.  The older farmer now has the best government funded pension policy of his entire life, for he can now sell his entire stock, rent out his land and yet he can still pick up—in the majority of cases—a very healthy cheque for doing absolutely nothing, while others, being unsuccessful in their bid for entitlements from the National Reserve, are farming with no financial help while producing a commodity.

  9.  This ridiculous situation does two detrimental things for farmers and farming alike. Firstly, the old boys desire to keep the entitlement payments have shot the price of rental land and grass keep through the roof—as farmers like us who find ourselves with more entitlements than owned land have to pay through the nose for land this year—grass keep is up by as much as £50 in the Raglan/USK area.

  10.  Secondly, this new system does nothing to help the public's perception of farmers. How can it be justified to the tax paying public that we, for example, could sell all our 700 cattle, rent out our 300 acres of land, yet still be paid just under £1,000 a week in subsidies? The payments we now have at least are put to good use, as a product is being created, ie prime finished beef—but the system currently still allows payment for non-production. No wonder there is no sympathy and so much apathy aimed at us farmers.

  11.  Agriculture is Britain's last industry we are now a consumer nation and not a producing nation. God forbid, if there were ever a world war, we would never as a nation survive. We depend on foreign imports to heat, clothe, feed and transport us. If fuel was put up to £10 or £20 a gallon—which could happen if we pick on Iran, we could not afford to import food. What would happen—we as a country are completely beholden to others to the extent we could be frozen and starved out of our own country. Should our agricultural industry be sold down the swanny as has our manufacturing, coal, steel, and construction industries—now all vanished or taken over by imports. Agricultural policy should be separate to government policy, which can move the goal posts in an afternoon. It is a continuity of good, sound, and reasoned policy that is required for the future.

  12.  There are more pages I could write, and many more policies which I could tell you about that make no sense to the farmer at all.

  13.  What carrot will the Government be able to use after 2012 and the abolishing of subsidies to "police" farming. We are currently farming in the "Big Brother" countryside with spies both in the sky and in the neighbourhood. What will happen to all those employed at BCMS, Defra, regional Affairs, inspectors etc etc when 2012 comes, the farmer is then not entitled to any payments? No one can answer that.

  14.  At least let the farmers who are actually getting their hands dirty and working hard, let them be the ones to receive payment, and not pay people to sit in the house on their back sides.

  15.  If Government want to remove the link between payment and "over production" (although that myth has long since been dispelled, or why import meat from food and mouth endemic countries) then why not link payments to good farming practice?

  16.  Arable payments could be given to producers to enable individual farmers to install bio-fuel plants (cost £26k) to fuel all arable cultivations—reducing emissions and saving money on the ever increasing price of diesel. Where farms could not individually justify individual plants, local co-operatives could be set up.

  17.  Stock payments—should be aimed at farmers who produce prime quality meats using good sound husbandry, environmental and conservational practices. If cross compliance does not want poaching of ground through winter grazing, bring in 50% grants towards the cost of erecting new farm buildings and handling systems and building environmentally sensitive slurry stores.

  18.  Put payments into helping pay for quality stock lines, to bring this country's whole meat production to an overall standard of excellence. Let's give agriculture a low interest borrowing rate as do France and some other EU countries. Lets get the public on board, so as they are loyal to our product—we do not need to fly in frozen sheep from New Zealand over 12,000 miles when as a nation we could feed ourselves.

  19.  Stop Britain becoming the "National Park" of Europe, let us do what our prime land was intended to do—produce the finest quality foods to feed our fine nation of people.

June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 24 May 2007