Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Sixth Report


1  INTRODUCTION

1. In order to improve our scrutiny of the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), we decided to undertake a new style of inquiry into Defra's implementation of the European Union Environmental Liability Directive (ELD). We announced that the written evidence received by the Committee would provide the background information upon which to base a single evidence session with the Minister. This form of inquiry is designed to allow the Committee to examine additional areas of Defra activity when time does not permit the traditional long form of inquiry with a number of evidence sessions.

2. Our terms of reference were as follows:

    What consultations Defra has had on the Directive since it was adopted in 2004 and with whom, and whether Defra has listened to consultees' views. Why Defra has taken so long to consult formally on the ELD. Whether any important questions were omitted from the formal consultation.

    What discretion Member States have in the implementation of the ELD, and the reasons for Defra seeking to apply the 'permit' and 'state of knowledge' defences under Article 8 (4). Which other Member States will be imposing strict liability to a wider range of activities than is Defra, and which are applying a more sensitive test of damage.

    Why the Government is proposing to limit the scope of the ELD to EU-protected biodiversity, and which SSSIs would be affected.

    What effect implementing the ELD in the manner proposed by the Government is likely to have on its meeting the 2010 targets under the Biodiversity Action Plan and its PSA target to bring 95% of nationally important wildlife sites into favourable condition; and whether the ELD may take resources away from achieving these targets.

    The timescale for implementation of the Directive.

    The capacity of organisations such as the Environment Agency, Natural England and NGOs to take action under the Directive.

3. We are grateful to those who took the trouble to send memoranda to us; the material we received was very useful in preparing for our evidence session with Ian Pearson MP, the then Minister of State for Climate Change and the Environment, on 13 June. We also express our thanks to Sandy Luk, an environmental consultant, who briefed us informally on the ELD.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 12 July 2007