Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 117-119)

MR TREWIN RESTORICK AND MR SIMON ROBERTS

1 NOVEMBER 2006

  Q117 Mr Drew: I know Mr Roberts is on his way, so do not feel as though you are quite on your own, Mr Restorick. He will be with us shortly. I do not know how long he is delayed, but I gather he is in transit, and Mr Sorrell, who was going to give evidence in the second session, is not very well, so we are a bit down today. You know the tenor of the evidence that we are seeking today. Michael Jack is the Chairman. He gives his apologies. He is batting for us in a different field. To begin, I think what we would like is for you to say exactly what the Global Action Plan is in terms of the organisation and then I will go straight into some questions.

  Mr Restorick: Thank you for the invitation to talk here. My name is Trewin Restorick. I am the Director of Global Action Plan. We are a charity. We were set up in this country in 1993 and we are actually part of an international organisation operating in 17 different countries. The aim of the charity when it was set up was to encourage individuals to live more sustainable lifestyles, so we concentrate specifically on helping people to reduce the amount of rubbish they throw away, to cut energy use, to use transport more wisely, to reduce water consumption. The way we do that is that we run fairly specific programmes with different audiences. We work an awful lot with very large companies and local authorities, working with them to help their employees create environmental change in the workplace, that is companies such as Scottish Power, E.ON, Britannia Building Society, fairly large well-known organisations. We work with predominantly secondary schools, trying to involve students from all sectors of the school in change within the school and in their local community and we also work with households through a programme called eco-teams, getting groups of households together and encouraging them to promote environmental change as well. The charity is fairly small, the turn-over this year will be about 1.5 million, and we employee 45 people in the United Kingdom.

  Q118  Mr Drew: That is very useful. Can we move on to look at the difference that you think you are making and the ways in which things could be ratcheted up. What are the big changes that you see happening and what are the big changes that need to happen in this area?

  Mr Restorick: I think what we have discovered through the programmes we have run is that there are certainly businesses and schools which are communities where both the business corporately and the school as an entity want to see change happen, and where those organisations give space and time to people to create the changes within the organisation, people are able to make environmental savings, typically anywhere between 10 to 15% of reduction of energy use and carbon emissions, and the changes they are making are incredibly simple changes, they are normal behaviour changes, those that we hear promoted by government on many occasions—turning things off rather than on stand-by, not leaving computer screens on, turning lights off, those simple behaviour changes—but we also see that businesses and schools also make structural changes. For example, when people measure how much energy a school is using, they suddenly realise that at night they are lighting up the entire school to run the after-school clubs because the teachers traditionally hold the after-school clubs in the classroom they are based in, whereas if they thought of it from an energy perspective, they would actually move all those into one building so they only have to heat and light one building. People are prepared and able to make changes fairly easily when they actually look at the thing from an energy and carbon perspective.

  Q119  Mr Drew: Should there be a national strategy, and, if there is going to be a national strategy, who should evolve that and should that evolution include NGOs like your own NGO as part of the decision-making process, or is that something that you would be wary about getting involved with?

  Mr Restorick: Personally, I think government is very willing to invest very large sums of money, it seems to us, in television awareness campaigns. The Energy Saving Trust and Carbon Trust, you see very large spends of money on programmes to promote awareness change. When you actually ask those agencies how has that actually changed behaviour, you get very a poor, if any, response at all. There seems to be a willingness to spend money to encourage people to become more aware, but that does not necessarily change behaviour, so we think that there is definitely scope to promote actual behaviour change. The question of who to do that comes down to a question of who do people trust. We are very aware that government and people are worried about the whole nanny state, the intrusion of government into people's lifestyles. When we work with businesses and households they seem quite open to listening to an environmental charity because they know we are coming with an agenda which is about environmental improvement and they seem much more receptive to the message than perhaps they would if it was a "thou shalt" campaign running down from government. We feel that NGOs have a crucial role to play in environmental change, provided that they are backed up by structural and policy leads by government.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 September 2007