Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Mr Bill Butcher (CRED 34a)

PERSONAL CARBON ALLOWANCES

A brief guide to how the policy would work

  The purpose is to provide incentives to individuals to reduce carbon emissions, through rewarding carbon thrift and penalising carbon waste. It is a cap and trade system.

  Government, or alternatively the independent Carbon Committee, would set an annual budget for the total amount of carbon that all individuals will be allowed. Initially this will be around 40% of all UK carbon emissions, the proportion that individuals are directly responsible for. This is the cap. The budget would be reduced each year in line with emissions reduction targets, currently 60% by 2050 (proposed statutory target in the Climate Change Bill) but adjusted over time to take account of science-based revisions of the reductions necessary to avoid runaway catastrophic climate change.

  Each individual adult would be given a free equal allowance of carbon for the coming year eg 5 tonnes or 5,000 units (a unit being a kilogramme of carbon equivalent). Children would probably get a half allowance. This allowance would be electronic. Each time an individual pays for one of five things—electricity, gas, oil, petrol, plane ticket—he/she surrenders the number of carbon units equivalent to the carbon emissions generated by use of that energy. Again this would be an electronic transaction through the energy supplier, airline booking or petrol station. A separate carbon debit card might be necessary or it might be handled through existing banking systems.

  Individuals who use less than their allowance can sell their surplus units through any bank or post office or to other people. Individuals who feel they need to use more must buy extra units. Extra units will normally be available for sale at banks, post offices and petrol stations. Visitors to the country will need to buy these units direct in order to buy petrol etc. Any individuals who don't want to trade can simply instruct their bank to sell their allowance immediately, and then rely on buying units at the point of purchase.

  The trading price of carbon units will vary according the degree of scarcity in the market. If on average people find it easy to keep within their allowance then units will be oversupplied and the price will be low. If on average people find it difficult and want to exceed their allowance then units will become scarce and the price will rise. In these circumstances the incentives to change behaviour to low carbon products and services will increase and drive the behaviour change.

  Businesses, organisations and the public sector will also join a cap-and-trade system. This could be an extension of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Here government would hold a weekly auction of carbon allowances, similar to the sale of government debt. Again the annual budget would be reduced in line with emissions targets. Brokers would sell units on to individual businesses and organisations through the banks. The revenue generated by government in the auction process should be invested in improved low carbon public services eg public transport and addressing fuel poverty.

  The interactions between personal carbon allowances, business cap-and-trade and the EU ETS need to researched and planned carefully to provide a seamless system.

  In a report to Defra in December 2006 the Centre for Sustainable Energy described the areas of personal carbon allowances that need investigation. The report sets out a five year road map to a potential introduction of the policy.

  The key advantages of the policy may be summarised:

    1.  Certainty of outcome. Provided the budget is set properly the system ensures that emissions reduction targets are met.

    2.  Preservation of choice to the individual. Within the constraints of the cap, individuals can choose to continue whichever carbon intensive behaviour they wish.

    3.  The policy raises awareness of the need to reduce carbon emissions in daily decision making across the whole population.

    4.  The policy is progressive. Overall, the affluent are higher carbon emitters than the poor. If unequal use of carbon across the population continues the policy transfers resources from the affluent to the poor. Fuel poverty, however, must be solved.

    5.  The policy is fair. Everyone gets an equal allowance.

    6.  The policy provides for gradual change in society to a low carbon economy, with long term certainty that allows individuals and businesses to plan ahead.

Bill Butcher

February 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 September 2007