Select Committee on European Scrutiny Sixth Report


2 Energy taxes

(a) (28116) 16188/06 COM(06) 741

(b) (28117) 16190/06 COM(06) 742

(c) (28145) 16424/06 COM(06) 768

(d) (28153) 16528/06 COM(06) 743

(e) (28162) 16757/06 COM(06) 794

(f) (28163) 16758/06 COM(06) 795

Commission Communication in accordance with Article 19(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC (local public passenger transport, armed forces, public administration, ambulances)

Commission Communication in accordance with Article 19(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC (private pleasure-flying)

Commission Communication in accordance with Article 19(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC (taxation of industrial uses of LPG and taxation of coal)

Commission Communication in accordance with Article 19(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC (operation of private pleasure craft)

Commission Communication in accordance with Article 19(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC (ambulant vendors)

Commission Communication in accordance with Article 19(1) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC (regional derogations)

Legal base
Documents originated(a), (b) and (d) 30 November 2006

(c) 5 December 2006

(e) and (f) 12 December 2006

Deposited in Parliament(a) and (b) 6 December 2006

(c) 11 December 2006

(d) 12 December 2006

(e) and (f) 15 December 2006

DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of consideration(a) (b) and (c) EMs of 18 December 2006

(d) EM of 19 December 2006

(e) and (f) EM of 9 January 2007

Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNot known
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared, further information requested

Background

2.1 The Energy Tax Directive, 2003/96/EC, sets out which energy products are concerned, the uses that make those products liable to tax, the minimum rates of taxation applicable to each product, depending on its use as a propellant, for industrial and commercial purposes or for heating, and specific exemptions from the normal rules. The Directive also sets out in annexes a number of derogations which allow Member States to apply reduced rates or exemptions from energy tax for various products and purposes. Most of these derogations were due to expire on 31 December 2006. Under Article 19 of the Directive a Member State may ask the Commission to propose to the Council a new or extended derogation. If the Commission makes such a proposal it is decided by the Council unanimously.

2.2 In October 2006 we reported that, as required by the Directive, the Commission had conducted a review of the current derogations and had issued a Communication with its view as to whether they should be allowed to continue beyond 2006. It considered derogations to be in four categories:

  • derogations relating to situations outside the scope of the Directive;
  • derogations which had become obsolete;
  • current derogations the objectives of which were taken into account through the flexibility offered by the general provisions of the Directive; and
  • derogations concerned with objectives not taken into account by the general provisions of the Directive.

2.3 In relation to the last category the Commission noted derogations, which after 31 December 2006 would have no legal basis under the Directive, covering:

  • fuel used by private pleasure air navigation;
  • fuel used for navigation in private pleasure craft;
  • waste oil reused as fuel;
  • specific policy purposes in certain geographical areas; and
  • miscellaneous purposes.

The Commission's view was that the expiry of most of the derogations should be seen as an opportunity to achieve greater transparency and greater coherence in the energy tax legislation. It asked Member States to assess in the light of its Communication whether they wished to seek renewal of any of their derogations. The Commission would assess any such requests on their merits, taking into account the proper functioning of the internal market, as well as Community environmental, energy and transport policies.

2.4 When we reported the Communication we noted that the Government:

  • held derogations for fuel used by private pleasure air navigation, fuel used for navigation in private pleasure craft and waste oil reused as fuel sub-categories;
  • had confirmed in the 2006 Budget that it would be applying for renewal of all three of its derogations; and
  • believed there was a credible case for renewal of the derogations and shortly would make formal applications for their renewal.[1]

The documents

2.5 These Communications announce the Commission's decisions not to accede to requests to propose extensions of derogations in 16 cases. These are:

  • document (a) — applications by Belgium, to partially exempt certain fuels used in local public passenger transport, by France to exempt certain fuels used in taxis within an annual limit, by Greece to exempt fuel used by national armed forces, police and various official vehicles and by Italy to exempt fuel used by national armed forces and to apply a reduced rate to certain fuels used in taxis substituting for public transport and to fuel used in certain ambulances;
  • document (b) — applications by the UK, France, Portugal, Malta and Sweden for partial or full exemptions for fuel used in private pleasure flying;
  • document (c) — applications by Greece to partial exempt liquid petroleum gas used for industrial purposes and by Lithuania to exempt coal;
  • document (d) — applications by the UK, Belgium and Malta for partial or full exemptions for gas oil used in navigation of private pleasure craft;
  • document (e) — an application by France to exempt fuel, up to an annual limit, used by retailers in small communes (less than 3000 inhabitants) whose business is partly through "ambulant sales" (mobile shops); and
  • document (f) — an application by Italy to exempt certain motor and heating fuels, up to annual limits, consumed in the regions of Val d'Aosta, Gorizia, Udine and Trieste.

2.6 In the Communications the Commission summarises the case of the Member State concerned for renewal of the exemption and the Commission's reasons for rejecting the case. In relation to the Government's case (and those of Belgium, France, Portugal, Malta and Sweden) for renewal of the derogations for fuel used in private pleasure flying and for fuel used in navigation of private pleasure craft the Commission says:

  • the arguments advanced by Member States do not constitute specific policy considerations within the meaning of Article 19 of the Directive;
  • the requests are not consistent with the proper functioning of the internal market, with the need to ensure fair competition and with community health, environment, energy and transport policies, as required by Article 19;
  • Member States' arguments concerning administrative burdens, compliance and enforcement difficulties, possible safety issues and the possible effect on associated businesses, tourism, or the training industry are not valid reasons to justify renewal of the derogation as they are inherent in moving towards the normal Community tax treatment for this activity;
  • derogations were aimed at overcoming initial difficulties in implementation;
  • there has been sufficient time for any difficulties to be resolved since the principle that fuel used in private flying is taxable was established in 1993, in accordance with the completion of the internal market; and
  • extension of the derogations would contradict Community environment, energy and transport policies as it would not accurately reflect the negative external costs of the activity.

2.7 The Commission has still to issue decisions on a number of other applications for extensions of derogations, including the Government's in relation to waste oil reused as fuel.

The Government's view

2.8 The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo) says that the Commission decisions announced in documents (a), (c), (e) and (f) have no impact for the UK. As for the decision on fuel for private pleasure flying, document (b) the Minister says:

  • this derogation has allowed the Government to charge duty for aviation gasoline at a reduced rate of 28.84 pence per litre and to fully exempt aviation turbine fuel used in private pleasure flying. Without this derogation all fuel used for private pleasure flying will be liable to the full rates of duty, that is 56.20 pence per litre for aviation gasoline and 54.68 pence per litre for aviation turbine fuel;
  • fuel used for commercial purposes will continue to benefit from the reduced and exempt rates;
  • the Government will consult interested parties in the aviation industry to assess the impact of the expiry of the derogation — informal consultations with a limited number of interested parties have already been held;
  • administrative procedures for collecting the duty will be developed in consultation with interested parties;
  • a regulatory impact assessment will be required to assess the compliance burden of new procedures for identification of fuel used in private flying and the subsequent collection of duty; and
  • there will be a net revenue gain following the implementation of the full rates of duty. The exact size of the private flying sector is very difficult to ascertain, but total revenue is not expected to exceed £15 million.

2.9 On the decision on fuel used in navigation of private pleasure craft, document (d), the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (John Healey) says:

  • this derogation has allowed the Government to charge duty on fuel used in pleasure boats at the rebated (red diesel) rate for gas oil of 7.69 pence per litre. Without this derogation all fuel used for private pleasure boating will be liable to the full rate of duty for ultra low sulphur diesel, that is currently 48.35 pence per litre;
  • use of rebated red diesel will continue to be permitted in commercial craft;
  • the Government recognises that the loss of the derogation will have an impact upon the boating sector;
  • the Government has already discussed the effect of the loss of the derogation with interested parties in the sector and it will be working with those affected to ensure implementation minimises burdens and compliance costs as far as possible;
  • an initial partial regulatory impact assessment was published at the Budget 2006. A full assessment will be required following further consultation with interested parties; and
  • there will be a net revenue gain following the implementation of the full rates of duty. Total revenue is not expected to exceed £10 million.

Conclusion

2.10 As we recalled above, when we considered the Commission's earlier Communication the Government told us that it believed there was a credible case for renewal of the UK derogations.[2] We presume the Government still thinks the case credible. And the rejection of its applications will be a considerable blow to those involved in the use of private pleasure planes or boats. So before we consider the present Communications further, we should like to hear from the Government what scope there is for it (and like-minded Member States) to try to persuade the Commission to change its mind.

2.11 Meanwhile the documents remain uncleared.





1   (27664) 11167/06: see HC 34-xxxvii (2005-06), para 55 (11 October 2006). Back

2   Ibid. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 26 January 2007