Select Committee on European Scrutiny Sixth Report


10 Management of the EU's southern maritime borders

(28109) 16126/06 COM(06) 733 Commission Communication on reinforcing the management of the European Union's southern maritime borders

Legal base
Document originated30 November 2006
Deposited in Parliament5 December 2006
DepartmentHome Office
Basis of considerationEM of 10 January 2007
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (28108) 16106/06: HC 41-v (2006-07), para 14 (10 January 2007)
Discussed in the European Council14-15 December 2006
Committee's assessmentPoliticallly important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

10.1 The European Agency for the management of operational cooperation at the EU's external borders (FRONTEX) was created by a Council Regulation of 2004.[26] In addition to coordinating operational cooperation between Member States, FRONTEX helps Member States train their border guards, conducts risk analyses, commissions research relevant to its functions and helps Member States organise joint operations for the return of illegal immigrants to their countries of origin. 2006 was the Agency's first full year of operation. Its headquarters are in Warsaw and its budget for 2007 is about €34 million.

10.2 In 2005, the European Council adopted a document called "Global Approach to Migration: priority actions focussing on Africa and the Mediterranean".[27] Last week, we considered a progress report by the Commission on the implementation of the Global Approach in 2006.[28]

The document

10.3 In the first section of this Communication on the management of the EU's southern maritime borders, the Commission refers to the unprecedented number of people who have tried over the last two years to gain illegal entry to the southern Member States bordering the Mediterranean and Atlantic. For example, over 17,000 illegal immigrants arrived in the Canary Islands in the first seven months of 2006, 5000 more than in the whole of 2005. The Commission calls for immediate and decisive action to counter illegal migration by sea; to identify and look after genuine asylum seekers travelling with illegal migrants; and to reduce the number of people lost at sea on the journey from Africa to the southern Member States.

10.4 The Commission calls for:

  • cooperation with third countries in Africa and the Mediterranean (as set out by the European Council in its statement of the Global Approach); and
  • stronger operational cooperation between Member States, FRONTEX, other EC agencies and international organisations such as the UNHCR.

The Communication makes proposals for the latter under four headings:

(i) Maximising the capacity of FRONTEX

10.5 The Commission's proposals under this heading include action:

  • to strengthen Member States' capacity to deal with the arrival at their borders of large numbers of illegal immigrants by early adoption of the draft Regulation on Rapid Border Intervention Teams;[29]
  • to give FRONTEX access to the information collected by the Immigration Liaison Officers' network and allow the Agency to attend ILO meetings;
  • to implement at once the power in Article 7 of the FRONTEX Regulation for the Agency to set up and keep records of technical equipment for control and surveillance which Member States are willing to make available for temporary use, on request, by other Member States;
  • to establish between the Agency, Member States and others facilities for real time coordination of joint operations;
  • to reach technical cooperation agreements between FRONTEX and bodies such as the European Maritime Safety Agency, the European Satellite Agency and the European Defence Agency;
  • to negotiate Memoranda of Understanding with the UNHCR and the International Organisation for Migration about the exchange of information, the allocation of tasks and cooperation; and
  • to examine the feasibility of continuous control and surveillance operations at the southern maritime borders from spring until late autumn.

(ii) New tools for the next generation of integrated border management

10.6 Under this heading the Commission outlines possibilities for action in the medium- and longer-term. They include:

  • The creation of a Coastal Patrol Network for the southern maritime borders. It would be run by the Member States and FRONTEX with the aim of pooling assets and expertise, coordinating patrols and exchanging intelligence.
  • The creation of a European Surveillance System for Borders (EUROSUR). Initially, it would link the existing national surveillance systems; later it might replace them, providing radar and satellite surveillance for the whole of Europe.
  • The establishment of teams of experts, made available voluntarily by Member States and deployable at short notice, to help ensure that a Member State facing a large mixed influx of asylum seekers and illegal migrants is able to deal properly with those in need of international protection and to safeguard the public health of the immigrants and the host country. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of "a structured contribution by UNHCR to the activities and operations implemented under the coordination of FRONTEX".[30]

(iii) The operational implementation of the international law of the sea

10.7 The Commission says that it is conducting a study of the international law of the sea. Among the issues it has already identified are:

  • the importance of Member States and African countries ratifying the Palermo Protocol against the smuggling of migrants by land, sea and air;
  • the desirability of clarifying the law on, and procedure for, the interception of vessels suspected of carrying illegal immigrants;
  • the need for clarity about how to determine the port at which migrants should be disembarked following rescue at sea or interception; and
  • the need for advice on the application of the principle of non-refoulment in cases where vessels have been intercepted.[31]

10.8 The Commission also suggests that practical guidelines might be produced, in consultation with the International Maritime Organization and the UNHCR, on ways to ensure the fulfilment of Member States' obligations under international law when conducting search and rescue operations.

(iv) Maximising the use of EC financial means

10.9 The Commission refers to the availability of money from the EC to support action to deal with illegal immigration and applicants for asylum. The sources of finance include the budget for FRONTEX; the External Borders Fund; the European Refugee Fund; and the 7th R&D Framework Programme.

The Government's view

10.10 The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Home Office (Joan Ryan) tells us that the Government welcomes the wide range of ideas outlined in the Commission's Communication and recognises the importance of the EC as a whole in helping the southern Member States cope with the increase in illegal migration.

10.11 In particular, she says that the proposals to maximise the capacity of FRONTEX are important. The Government has given the Agency financial support and will continue to second staff to it and take part in joint operations.

10.12 The Minister notes that the European Council was able to take account of the Communication when it discussed migration last month.

The December 2006 European Council

10.13 The Conclusions of the meeting of the European Council on 14-15 December endorse some of the ideas proposed in the Communication, such as strengthening the capacity of FRONTEX and reinforcing its links with the Immigration Liaison Officers network; examining the case for creating EUROSUR; setting up a permanent Coastal Patrol Network at the southern maritime borders; and early adoption of the draft Regulation on Rapid Border Intervention Teams.[32]

Conclusion

10.14 We regard the Commission's Communication as a constructive contribution to the search for ways to help deal with the difficulties caused by the large increase in illegal migration by sea to the Member States with borders on the Mediterranean and the Atlantic. We believe that closer cooperation between Member States and improved management of the flow of migrants is necessary not only for the effective prevention of illegal entry to the European Union but also for humanitarian reasons.

10.15 The Commission's proposals for action in the short term to strengthen FRONTEX and to improve operational cooperation appear to be practical and to show proper respect for the responsibilities of Member States for the control of their borders. It would, however, be premature for us to offer an opinion on the suggestions for longer-term initiatives, such as those which may emerge from the study of the law of the sea, since they are at an early stage and the Commission will be doing further work on them.

10.16 In our view, the document is of political importance and so we draw it to the attention of the House. We see no need, however, to keep it under scrutiny.





26   OJ No. L 349, 25.11.04, p.1. Back

27   European Council 15-16 December 2005, Presidency Conclusions, paragraph 10 and Annex I. Back

28   (28108) 16106/06: see HC 41-v (2006-07), para 14 (10 January 2007). Back

29   (27721) 11880/06: see HC 34-xxxvii (2005-06), para 22 (11 October 2006). Back

30   Commission Communication, page 10, paragraph 30. Back

31   "Non-refoulment" means the prohibition of expulsion or return to a country where the life or freedom of the individual would be threatened. Back

32   European Council 14-15 December 2006, Presidency Conclusions, paragraph 25 (c). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 26 January 2007