Select Committee on European Scrutiny Seventh Report


7 EU Strategy for Africa

(26918)
13293/05
COM(05) 489
+ ADD1
Commission Communication: EU Strategy for Africa: Towards a Euro-African Pact to Accelerate Africa's development

Legal base
DepartmentInternational Development
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 8 January 2007
Previous Committee ReportsHC 34-i (2005-06), para 4 (4 July 2005), HC 34-v (2005-06), paras 3 and 4 (12 October 2005), HC 34-vii (2005-06), paras 3 (26 October 2005) and HC 34-xii (2005-06) para 9 (30 November 2005) and HC 34-xv (2005-06), para 12 (18 January 2006)
Discussed in Council13 December 2005 General Affairs and External Relations Council and 15-16 December 2005 European Council
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared on 30 November 2005

Background

7.1 The Communication is the Commission's response to the instruction from the June 2005 European Council to draw up a long-term global strategy on Africa by the December 2005 European Council. The MDGs[17] are at the heart of the strategy. The Communication suggests that the EU should focus its support in areas considered essential for attaining the MDGs (peace and security and good governance), areas that create the economic environment necessary for achieving the MDGs (economic growth, trade and interconnection) and areas directly targeting the MDGs (social cohesion, decent work, gender equality and environment). These areas should be supplemented by support for economic integration and political cooperation with the EU. The African Union's (AU) "Peace Facility for Africa" should be replenished and strengthened to allow it better to support Africa's own efforts in this field.

7.2 The Communication includes a range of possible approaches in different areas, such as: good governance, respect for human rights and the fight against corruption; economic growth including trade and private sector development; support to increasing competitiveness of African agriculture; establishing an EU-Africa Partnership for Infrastructure; enhanced support for basic service provision in social sectors and further support for tackling poverty diseases; Migration; core labour standards; environment and climate change.

7.3 When we finally cleared the Communication on 30 November 2005, it was clear that — driven by a pithy UK Presidency paper, itself underpinned by a paper from the Secretary General/High Representative on the contribution of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) — the process of turning the Commission's overlong Communication into an effective Strategy was moving forward constructively. But the extent to which these two documents, along with the Communication, would be integrated into the final Strategy remained unclear. A number of further questions were posed around how the Strategy would relate to the revised European Consensus for Development and integrate with the work of other international organisations; and just how the EU would not only provide resources but also bring pressure to bear on the AU and partner governments to deliver on the fundamentals of good governance and economic reform. The Committee asked the Secretary of State for further clarification and to let it know the outcome of the December European Council.

7.4 His 9 January 2006 letter enclosed the final Strategy and answered these questions as effectively as he could at that stage. We noted at that time that a major common theme running through the large number of development assistance-related documents that we considered the previous Autumn was dramatically increasing the effectiveness of, in particular, EC aid — which, taken together with Member States' bilateral aid, is over 50% of global development assistance. This in turn meant dramatically improving the effectiveness of the EU's activities in Africa — hence the importance of the Africa Strategy. Even a superficial examination revealed the breadth and depth of its ambitions. The question now was: to what extent were its vital ambitions likely to be achieved? Effective implementation would demand an unprecedented level and effectiveness of cooperation between Member States and the Commission, and between them and the UN, the AU, the IFIs and other bilateral donors. It would pose unprecedented challenges for ESDP. It would require an unprecedented level of commitment and delivery on the part of African partners. Above all, it would require the EU to "put its money where its mouth is".

7.5 It was unclear at that time whether any of the follow-up work would be such as to require scrutiny by this Committee, at least ahead of the first formal review by the December 2006 European Council, which we envisaged being prepared by the autumn 2006 "Development" GAERC, in connection with which we anticipated a Commission document of some sort and an Explanatory Memorandum.[18]

The Minister's letter

7.6 In his 8 January 2007 letter, the Minister for Europe (Mr Geoffrey Hoon) at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office says that the Finnish Presidency, the European Commission and the Council Secretariat jointly produced a progress report entitled, "The EU and Africa: Towards a Strategic Partnership — The Way Forward and Key Achievements in 2006", which was presented to EU Heads of State and Government at the European Council on 14-15 December, which in turn reaffirmed, in Conclusions, "its earlier commitment to work towards a joint EU-Africa strategy and underlined the importance of monitoring progress towards all of the EU's commitments to Africa including the 2005 aid volume targets". He continues as follows:

"As the title suggests, the report is split into two sections, summarising progress on implementation in 2006 and identifying priority actions for 2007. The report notes substantive progress in many areas including work on increased dialogue and co-operation, peace and security, human rights and good governance, regional integration, trade, private sector development and interconnectivity, migration and aid. The four priority areas for action in 2007 are strengthening the strategic partnership with Africa, supporting Africa's quest for peace and good governance, promoting growth and sustainable development, and investing in people.

"We welcome the report as an accurate representation of EU support to Africa in 2006. There has been much activity to implement commitments and real progress has been made. On peace and security, agreement has been reached to provide further and increased funding through the Africa Peace Facility to support the African Union. EU election observation missions have been deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Zambia and Mauritania. Member States have agreed to make over €20 billion in EC funds available to Africa between 2007 and 2013 including targeted support for peace and security, governance and infrastructure.

"But we need to maintain momentum on delivery. The UK places particular importance on the forward look section of the report. We have been emphasising to EU partners, and will continue to do so, the need to up the pace on delivery, particularly on trade and access to basic services such as health, education and water. In addition to implementation of these commitments, the EU will build on the Strategy through the negotiation next year with African partners of a Joint Strategy encompassing joint commitments, and which we hope will be endorsed at an EU-Africa Summit soon.

"We believe that the report and the European Council's reaffirmed commitment has helped to maintain focus and momentum on the EU's commitments to Africa. We are also pleased that, as proposed during a recent House of Lords debate on EU-Africa, progress on the strategy will henceforth be reviewed on an annual basis rather than bi-annually as had originally been agreed."

Conclusion

7.7 We are surprised that someone as experienced as the Minister for Europe, along with his counterpart at the Department for International Development, should have overlooked our clearly-expressed expectation that whatever document informed the December European Council discussion of the Strategy would be deposited together with an Explanatory Memorandum ahead of the Council's consideration of it. The timing and format of this somewhat brief exposition and analysis is a poor substitute: sight of the report along with an Explanatory Memorandum would have given the House considerably more insight into not only what has, but also what has not, been achieved thus far, as well as what is further envisaged in this Strategic Partnership.

7.8 For the future, we expect the next and subsequent annual progress reports to be deposited in good time ahead of the relevant Council so that they can be properly scrutinised.

7.9 We also look forward to scrutinising the Joint Strategy encompassing joint commitments to which the Minister refers, ahead of any endorsement at an EU-Africa Summit.





17   The eight UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are those that, in 2000, the UN set itself to achieve, most by 2015: eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/Aids, malaria and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; and develop a partnership for development - each with associated targets and benchmarks to measure progress. Back

18   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 5 February 2007