Select Committee on European Scrutiny Eighth Report


3 Customs

(28210)

5048/07

COM(06) 866

Draft Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters

Legal baseArticles 135 and 280 EC; co-decision; QMV
Document originated22 December 2006
Deposited in Parliament9 January 2007
DepartmentRevenue and Customs
Basis of considerationEM of 22 January 2007
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilMay 2007
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared, further information requested

Background

3.1 Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 is the legal basis for mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States with responsibility for ensuring the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters. The Regulation includes provision for a database, the Customs Information System, which is used by the relevant authorities to post alerts of risks of irregular operations by transmitting information for the purposes of sighting, reporting, discreet surveillance or specific controls.

The document

3.2 This draft Regulation is to amend Regulation (EC) No 515/97 to reflect subsequent changes in other relevant instruments which impact on the Regulation and, more substantively, to introduce enhancements to the Regulation to improve the ability of Member States and the Commission to more effectively prevent, investigate and prosecute operations that are in breach of customs and agricultural legislation by;

·  introducing a structured information exchange mechanism without prior request from the receiving Member State, similar to that already in place in the fields of value added tax and excise duties;

·  setting up a European data directory by allowing the Commission to negotiate access to a variety of existing public and private sector databases covering international trade, the content of which can be used for analysis with the objective of detecting potential irregularities and by making that information available to Member States' relevant authorities;

·  making available to the relevant authorities of Member States, at their request, the services and infrastructure of the Commission in order to coordinate operational cooperation;

·  allowing a Member State, providing information to another Member State, to give prior consent for onward transmission of that information to a third country where an appropriate agreement or protocol is in place;

·  amending the provisions on the control of personal data to conform with current relevant Community law on data protection and including reference to the establishment of the European Data Protection Supervisor;

·  extending the functionality of the Customs Information System to include strategic and operational analysis;

·  creating a database of past and current investigations for Member States to check which other authorities have conducted similar investigations;

·  designating the Regulation as the basic act on which financing for the technical and service infrastructure to support the systems and procedures described in the Regulation is based; and

·  amending the scope of the Committee, which advises on the management of the systems and procedures covered by the Regulation and which is comprised of representatives from the Member States and chaired by the Commission, to reflect the new provisions contained in the proposal.

The Government's view

3.3 The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo) tells us that the Government supports improvements in the mutual assistance mechanisms used by the Member States and the Commission to fight fraud against the financial interests of the Community in the field of customs and agriculture legislation and to effectively control the borders to detect counterfeit goods and other illicit dealings such as in drugs precursors. She says that insofar as the draft Regulation is an updating exercise to reflect subsequent changes in other legislation it has the Government's broad support. But it has reservations about some of the ideas for extending the scope of the existing Regulation.

3.4 The Minister says that the Government can support the proposed provisions:

·  allowing for automatic data exchange;

·  using Commission services for operational cooperation; and

·  on data protection (but the Government is checking with the Information Commissioner that he is also content).

3.5 The Minister then outlines the matters on which the Government has reservations:

·  setting up a European data directory. The principle of using relevant databases to assist the control authorities in their work is supported. But there are concerns relating to the added value of doing this at the level of the Community, as it is the relevant national authorities who have the responsibility of analysing and managing the risks for which they are responsible, to having liaison officers posted to Brussels, which could be costly, resource intensive and questionable, and to the legal basis on which the Commission could have access to this information;

·  giving prior consent to forward information to a third country. The Government can understand the administrative case for allowing a Member State that provides information to another Member State to give prior consent for onward transmission of that information to a third country. But it wants confirmation that sufficient safeguards are in place to ensure that information cannot be transmitted to an inappropriate third country;

·  using data on the Customs Information System for analytical purposes. There is no indication of what benefits having this analytical function would achieve. The UK authorities, as with other Member States, already carry out analysis on the information it collects from a variety of sources; and

·  creating a customs investigations database. The principle is supported. But there are concerns, as there were with a similar 3rd Pillar database. The Government wants to be sure the investigations to be covered are not already catered for by other databases, or that the remit of other databases could not be extended, before introducing yet another system.

3.6 The Minister concludes on the policy implications that her department needs to consult further with the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Information Commissioner's Office whilst reserving its position in the Council's working group on the draft Regulation until there is sufficient clarity for a considered view on the issues of concern.

3.7 As for the financial implications of the proposal the Minister says that the Financial Perspective for 2007-2013 to support the requirements of Regulation (EC) 515/97 total €36.93 million (£25.64 million), but the Commission has not specifically identified the costs related to the changes or new requirements that spring from the draft amending Regulation. She says the Government will need a more detailed explanation from the Commission of what the funds are intended to cover and how the proposals are catered for in the Financial Perspective. The Minister adds that, as the provider of the infrastructure and services on behalf of the Member States, most of the costs are borne by the Commission. Member States use existing IT equipment to access and use the systems, and incur minor extra costs when there are upgrades or new functionalities to add. She says the Government will want to know if the proposals will add significantly to what is done currently.

Conclusion

3.8 We can see that this proposal could add to the effectiveness of the present Regulation governing mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States with responsibility for ensuring the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters and for preventing fraud against the financial interests of the Community. But we note the Government's reservations on a number of matters. So before considering the document further we should like to hear about developments on these issues during negotiations, particularly in relation to both data protection and the proposed European data directory. Meanwhile we do not clear the document.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 February 2007