Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-First Report


11 European electronic communications regulations and markets

(28519)

8089/07

COM(07) 155

+ ADDs 1-2

Commission Communication: European Electronic Communications Regulations and Markets 2006 and Annex (Commission Staff Working Paper Volumes I and II)

Legal base
Document originated29 March 2007
Deposited in Parliament3 April 2007
DepartmentTrade and Industry
Basis of considerationEM of 25 April 2007
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (27315) 6700/06: HC 34-xxiii (2005-06) para 7 (29 March 2006) and (27286) 6114/06: HC 34-xxi (2005-06) para 9 (8 March 2006)
To be discussed in CouncilTo be determined
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared; further information requested.

Background

11.1 The main aim of the new legislative package for electronic communications introduced in 2003 was a lighter, but comprehensive and technology-neutral, framework, based on competition law principles. It also aimed to streamline the entire regulatory process by limiting ex ante regulation[31] to what is strictly necessary and by rendering the regulatory process as transparent as possible. It adapted the existing rules to take account of the convergence between telecommunications, information technology and media in evolving markets, where the same services can be delivered over a variety of platforms and received via a range of different terminals. Consultation and cooperation are key features, in the light of the increased flexibility given to National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) to choose the most appropriate tools for dealing with regulatory concerns as they arise. The five main Directives are:

  • Directive 2002/21/EC, the Framework Directive, contains the rules and principles which apply horizontally to all the activities covered by the other, specific, Directives. It focuses particularly on the responsibilities and powers of the NRAs, the foundation of the new regulatory system.
  • Directive 2002/20/EC, the Authorisation Directive, is intended to reduce the regulatory burdens on market access and to ensure more consistent treatment of operators and different technologies.
  • Directive 2002/19/EC, the Access and Interconnection Directive, aims to ensure that relations between operators are left as far as possible to competitive market forces, while giving flexible powers to NRAs to intervene where necessary.
  • Directive 2002/22/EC, the Universal Service Directive, provides NRAs with the necessary powers to protect users' interests in situations where competition and market forces are the most effective means to satisfy user needs generally.
  • Directive 2002/58/EC, the E-Privacy Directive, the main elements of which are controls on sending unsolicited direct marketing communications by email, SMS, fax and automated calling machines; rules on the use of cookies[32] by website operators; general data retention rules; and rules on the use and retention of communications traffic and location data.

11.2 Development of radio spectrum policy also contributes to the implementation of the eCommunications regulatory framework and is based on the Radio Spectrum Decision 676/2002/EC which coordinates and supports the radio spectrum needs of EU policies and initiatives in such sectors as communications, R&D and broadcasting.

11.3 The Framework also establishes a number of committees and policy groups to manage and implement the new system:

  • Communications Committee: which advises on implementation issues;
  • European Regulators Group: to encourage cooperation and coordination between NRAs and the Commission, in order to promote the development of the internal market for electronic communications networks and services and consistent application, in all Member States, of the provisions set out in the Directives;
  • Radio Spectrum Policy Group: to enable Member States, the Commission and stakeholders to coordinate the use of radio spectrum; and
  • Radio Spectrum Committee: to deal with technical issues around harmonisation of radio frequency allocation across Europe.

The Commission Communication

11.4 This is the twelfth Report bringing together the Commission's annual research on communications markets across the EU and its assessment of how well each Member State has implemented the regulatory framework. It covers the period up to 1 October 2006 in terms of the data used and up to 31 December 2006 for the regulatory situation.

11.5 In preparing the Report, Commission officials visit each Member State to interview Government officials, regulators (Ofcom in the UK), leading companies (e.g. BT, C&W, Orange, Vodafone) and consumer groups.

11.6 A Commission Staff Working Paper accompanies the Communication. Volume I (289 pages) reviews the state of EU electronic communications services markets (fixed, mobile and broadband) and looks at the regulatory environment, consumer interests and spectrum management. It also includes a detailed annex on national markets and regulatory performance of each Member State. Volume II (167 pages) gives a comprehensive, detailed overview of national and EU markets.

11.7 The main findings of an extensive and thorough piece of work are fully and helpfully summarised by the Minister of State for Industry and the Regions (Margaret Hodge) in her Explanatory Memorandum of 25 April 2007.

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

"Traditional fixed voice telephony revenue has decreased across the EU. The cause is a) competition pushing prices down and b) people turning to their mobile phones or to new (and still emerging) services like Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP). Revenue from mobile services continues to grow but at a slower rate than in 2005. Most movement was seen in the broadband market, the fastest growing area, in which the Commission notes that increasing revenues have offset some of the losses in traditional business.

"Investment in the electronic communications sector was 5% higher than in 2005 and 2006. It was the fourth consecutive year-on-year increase. The EU invests more in this sector in absolute terms than either the US or Japan. The value of the sector had increased by 13.53% during 2006 and by 23.84% over the last three years. Merger and acquisition activity added to the impression of a healthy and dynamic market sector.

"There is an increasing trend for convergence with most major fixed and mobile operators offering two or more traditionally distinct services (e.g., fixed, mobile, broadband). Content is becoming more important, with the emergence of internet and mobile TV and a trend towards bundled package deals for a single flat price.

"Mobile penetration has now exceeded 100%, i.e. there are more mobile phones than people in the EU. Increased competition is pushing down national prices and the Commission is working on a Regulation to deal with the problems it identified with high roaming charges in previous reports.

"Incumbent operators continue to increase their presence in Member States outside their home country (e.g. France Telecom via the Orange brand and BT in EU-wide business markets).

"Broadband speeds in the EU are still lower than in the US, Japan and Korea. This is due, in part, to the high density of population in Japan and Korea and more high-capacity cable networks in the US (as opposed to much of the EU which is dominated by traditional copper lines to and from premises).

"Broadband take-up rates (the percentage of people using broadband technologies in their home) are encouraging, although the gap between the best and lowest performers is increasing because countries with the highest take-up rates are growing more rapidly. The best performing EU countries (the top six, of which the UK is 6th) have rates above 20% and are growing faster than Japan and South Korea. The Commission cites effective competition as a major driver of broadband take-up.

"Member States that have competing national infrastructures, such as the Netherlands and Denmark, have the best take-up rates. The UK performs well, too, because access to BT's network is effectively regulated by Ofcom".

REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS

"Twenty-five Member States have now transposed the 2002 regulatory framework (the last of these, Greece, implemented in 2006). Two of the new Member States, Romania and Bulgaria, have started implementation via primary legislation.

" The Commission is concerned (as are we) by the proposed amendment to German telecoms law which would give Deutsche Telekom a regulatory 'holiday' to encourage them to build a higher speed broadband network. The Commission has started legal proceedings against Germany which are likely to lead to a case at the European Court.

"On deregulation, the Commission noted the voluntary settlement reached between Ofcom and BT in the UK that led to the functional separation of BT's monopoly network to an independent company within BT Group: Openreach. Some sector-specific regulation has been reduced or removed in markets that have been found to be competitive, e.g. mobile access (outbound calls) and international fixed calls markets.

"On the importance of independent national regulators (like Ofcom in the UK), the Commission notes that competition and investment will only reach its full potential where the independence and impartiality of the regulator can be relied on by those considering investing ('the market'). The Commission raises some concerns about the political independence of the Polish and Slovakian regulators, as well as enduring state ownership of some incumbent operators.

"Most national regulators have completed the first round of market reviews to determine whether any operator has significant market power. There are, however, delays in implementing 'remedies' to neutralise the effect of significant market power (e.g. infrastructure access rules or price caps). Some countries have lengthy appeals processes that delay the imposition of effective remedies, while other regulators are too slow in proposing remedies once they have found significant market power (Germany was singled out, again).

"On spectrum, the Commission notes that some Member States are implementing a more liberal and flexible approach to spectrum management, which the Commission believes is essential for efficient spectrum use and economic growth. The Commission is concerned about the lack of harmonised approaches and is examining these 'shortcomings' in its current review of the framework.

"The Commission notes that digital switchover is starting to happen in most Member States, which should be completed within the timeframe set by the Commission (2012)".

CONSUMER INTERESTS

"The Commission makes passing comments on the state-of-play of universal service, services for disabled users and emergency access via the '112' telephone number (equivalent to '999' and available in all Member States, including the UK) and the importance of price transparency. These aspects are being reviewed in greater detail in the Commission's current review of the regulatory framework.

"The e-Privacy Directive (an extension of the Data Protection Directive for electronic communications) has been implemented in all Member States and the Commission is looking at strengthening some aspects in its current review of the framework, of which the e-Privacy Directive is part.

"Number portability (the ability to take your phone number with you when you change supplier) is noted as a key element for competition. Ofcom is currently looking at ways of improving the UK system of porting numbers, which has been criticised (though not in this Report) as being too tortuous for supplier recipients of ported numbers (i.e. the phone numbers that new customers want to bring with them when they switch)".

CONCLUSIONS

"The Commission concludes that where the framework has been implemented well the resulting effective competition has brought benefits to consumers in terms of price and innovative new services and/or packages".

"There remain some concerns about the single market not being attainable under the existing framework and the Commission is seeking to address its concerns via its review of the framework. A communication is expected in the summer setting out the Commission's plans for changes to the Directives that form the framework".

ASSESSMENT OF THE UK

"The UK is praised for having competitive markets (including competitive retail prices) and for healthy growth in investment and broadband take-up.

"The Commission focused on the contribution to effective competition of Ofcom's solution to improving competitor access to BT's monopoly local network (the bit between exchanges and premises): 'functional separation' and the creation of Openreach. The Commission notes that it is too early to say whether functional separation has been a long-term success (compared to doing nothing or to 'structural" separation', as in the case of British Gas and Transco). However, it has recognised some early positive signs (e.g., greater choice and lower prices for consumers and increased investment).

"Openreach was set up by BT via voluntary, legally-binding Undertakings under the UK Enterprise Act. Ofcom is one of the few EU regulators that has concurrent competition and sector-specific (EU framework) powers. The Commission's immediate reaction to functional separation was concern that the arrangement might not be compatible with the EU framework. They have since understood and supported Ofcom's approach.

"BT's voluntary approach in agreeing the deal, and its commitment to seeing it through was noted by the Commission as vital for success. BT stands out among most other incumbent operators in the EU as one with as much focus on overseas business as the home market. This means that BT is often operating as a competitor to incumbents in other Member States and that access to incumbent infrastructure is as much a priority for them, as it is for BT's competitors in the UK.

"The UK market is noted for the dramatic increase in investment and resulting competition, following the Openreach deal. Convergence is really happening in the UK. We have seen acquisitions (e.g. Sky buying Easynet, the internet service provider with some broadband infrastructure), mergers (Virgin and NTL:Telewest) and other significant high-street brands entering the broadband/telephony market (e.g. Carphone Warehouse). Investment in local loop unbundling (taking over control from BT of the management and maintenance of the local connection to their customers) by internet service providers, including Tiscali and Orange (formerly Wanadoo), has also increased significantly.

"The fixed telephone market is the most competitive in the EU, with the highest number of operators (11) sharing 90% of the market. BT's share of this market is the lowest of all EU incumbents. The mobile market remains competitive with the highest number of service providers offering mobile calls over the five mobile networks (mobile virtual network operators, or "MVNOs") as well as prices that continue to fall.

"Around 70% of UK homes now have digital television and internet TV is starting to take-off. Concerns were raised to the Commission about access to monopoly premium audiovisual rate content and the Commission urges vigilance in Ofcom's application of its competition laws to sort out any abuse of a monopoly position.

"The Commission is very satisfied with both the UK position on flexible spectrum management, including spectrum trading and the current state of play (Ofcom is the first regulator to enable spectrum trading but it has yet to take off in large volumes).

"On consumers, the Commission notes Ofcom's work on improving the availability of price comparison information via an independent website. The mobile operators have also launched an independent service and price comparison website.

"The Commission wrote to Ofcom in December 2005 about its concerns that all mobile subscribers who want to be included in the phone directory are given the opportunity. Ofcom is working towards ensuring that all operators explicitly offer a directory entry to all new subscribers, but notes that over 90% of mobile phone users do not want to have their number in a public directory.

"Ofcom is also urgently reviewing its position on the legality (in UK and EU law) of BT being obliged to offer access to its master directory database, to ensure that the UK is compliant with the relevant part of the Universal Service Directive (Article 5). We continue to monitor the situation in liaison with Ofcom.

"The Commission also notes Ofcom's plans to regulate to bring down the costs of calling revenue-sharing phone numbers including 0870, in the face of consumer and media outrage at 'being ripped-off'. The industry had raised viability and cost-benefit concerns with Ofcom about, what is (in their opinion), an overly-harsh new regime. Ofcom went with the consumer lobby, although the changes will not start to take full effect from 2008, to give industry time to adapt to the changes."

The Government's view

11.8 The Minister says:

"The UK has performed well in implementing and enforcing the EU regulatory framework and the Commission reports that the UK regulatory regime has led to effective competition (e.g., wide choice of service providers, low prices) and healthy investment.

"There is a clear link between Ofcom's independence and effective regulation. Ofcom, as an independent organisation, and its decision-making processes are praised as being both effective and consistent with the letter and spirit of EU law.

"The Commission now understands and accepts the UK-specific solution (achieved through Ofcom's concurrent competition powers under the Enterprise Act) to solving access problems to an incumbent's monopoly local network (the 'Openreach' model, or 'functional separation'). The Commission is now seriously considering putting a 'functional separation' significant market power remedy into the revised framework, so that it is available to regulators who do not have concurrent competition powers".

11.9 Looking ahead, the Minister says the next phase of policy activity in this area will begin in earnest this summer, when the Commission publishes its proposals for legislative change.

Conclusion

11.10 There continues to be much good news for UK consumers in this latest Report, and much to commend in the UK's performance and approach.

11.11 But a broadband take-up rate performance threshold of 20% might be regarded as somewhat low, particularly when coupled with the lower broadband speeds in Europe when compared with the US, Japan and Korea. The Minister notes the German approach to this latter concern and the Commission's, and her own, unhappiness with it. But she does not suggest what her own views are, given that European performance is clearly lagging, and needs to be improved if, for example, the Lisbon ICT targets —with all their implications for jobs and growth — are to be met. We should be grateful if she would expand more fully on what the German approach is, what is wrong with it and how the Government would see this particular challenge best being tackled.

11.12 The immediate challenges are two-fold. The first is an effective Regulation on mobile roaming charges, where discussions between the Presidency, Commission and the European Parliament are currently under way, and upon which we have recently taken evidence from the Minister.[33]

11.13 The second is to maintain the current approach and the momentum towards ensuring that the benefits of competition, innovation and cost reduction are spread throughout the single market. As the Minister notes, given BT's position and ambitions in a number of European markets, it is not just the general good that is at stake here.

11.14 As the Minister says, this Report sets the scene, in part, for the Commission's proposals for amending the legislation, which are expected in the summer. Given the pace of change and the convergence of wireless technologies, one of the key issues will be spectrum management, which we consider elsewhere in this Report.[34]

11.15 We look forward to scrutinising the Commission's proposals in this and other areas in due course. In the meantime, we clear this Communication.


31   Under ex ante, prior control is exercised, with the action in question being reviewed and approved before it is taken, rather than being examined subsequently. Back

32   Often used by website operators to save customers time when customers revisit the operator's website to place a new order, cookies contain information that is automatically sent from the operator's website and stored on the user's PC during the user's first connection to that site, which allows the operator to identify the user's profile on any subsequent connection made from that PC to the website. Back

33   (27110) 11724/06: see HC 41-xv (2006-07), para 3 (21 March 2007). Back

34   See paragraph 9 of this report. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 22 May 2007