Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-Ninth Report


1  Introduction


1. Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty) requires the Community to act within the limits of the powers conferred on it, and of the objectives assigned to it, by the Treaty. So whenever we are scrutinising a proposal for legislation or action, we examine whether there is a "legal base" for it in the Treaty.[1]

2. There are specific legal bases to enable most of the Community's objectives to be given effect. For example, Article 63 of the EC Treaty authorises the Council of Ministers to adopt legislation on asylum, refugees and immigration. And Article 148 requires the Council to adopt decisions to implement the European Social Fund.

3. But there is not a specific legal base for some of the Community's objectives. In such case, Article 308 of the EC Treaty may fill the gap. It provides:

    "If action by the Community should prove necessary to attain, in the course of the operation of the common market [our emphasis], one of the objectives of the Community, and this Treaty has not provided the necessary powers, the Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, take the appropriate measures."

4. Whenever Article 308 is cited as the legal base for a proposal, it is our practice (and was that of previous Committees) to check that the proposal:

  • is necessary to attain one of the Treaty's objectives
  • in the course of the operation of the common market and
  • the Treaty has not provided the necessary power elsewhere.

5. We, and our predecessors, have identified some proposals for legislation for which Article 308 was cited as the legal base but which, in our opinion, had no or no substantial connection with the operation of the common market. For example, in 2006 the Commission, citing the Article as the legal base, proposed a draft Decision which would, among other things, provide for assistance from Member States and the EC to third countries in the event of a major emergency outside the geographical area of the Community. We questioned whether Article 308 would provide a lawful legal base for the provision of assistance outside the Community if no connection could be shown to the operation of the common market. The Government told us, however, that it considered the use of Article 308 to be acceptable because, in its view, it is not necessary that "every proposal under Article 308 should relate in a narrow and restrictive sense to the operation of the common market". There was support from no other Member State for the view that the Article was not appropriate. We remained unpersuaded by the Government's view and drew the arguments to the attention of the House.[2]

6. In that case and others, it was clear to us that there was a difference of opinion between the Committee and the Government which was unlikely to be resolved by consideration of individual cases. The difference turned on a question of general application: what weight should be given to the reference in Article 308 to "in the course of the operation of the common market"? We decided, therefore, to conduct an inquiry into the question.

7. We asked the Secretaries-General of the Council and the Commission for their views on the interpretation of the reference and suggested an informal meeting to discuss the question. We had a most constructive and helpful meeting with representatives of the Commission and the Council's Legal Service in February. We subsequently agreed with them a note of the main points they had made about their understanding of Article 308.

8. We sent the note of the meeting to the Foreign Secretary and asked whether her understanding of Article 308 was the same as that of the Commission and the Council's Legal Service. We are grateful for her response.[3]

9. We are also grateful to Professor A A Dashwood CBE, of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge, for his written evidence to us.[4]

10. The next Chapter sets out the evidence we have received. Chapter 3 contains our findings and conclusions.


1   Where action by the Community is proposed, it is normally necessary to identify a specific provision in the EC Treaty authorising the EC institutions to adopt the proposed measure. Such provisions are known as "legal bases". Back

2   (27264) 5865/06: see HC 41-ii (2006-07), para 7 (29 November 2006).  Back

3   Ev 1. Back

4   Ev 3. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 July 2007