Quadripartite Select Committee Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 200-204)

MR MARK FUCHTER, MR GUY WESTHEAD, MR DAVID RICHARDSON AND MR DAVID GREEN QC

1 MARCH 2007

  Q200  Chairman: If we are talking about 200,000 assault rifles, who is it who goes to the dealer and says, "Oi, mate, what are you going to do with these then?"?—

  Q201  John Barrett: It is not yourselves.

  Mr Fuchter: It would be our firearms and explosives officers in the context of imports. I should stress that we are not talking about one consignment here of 200,000 weapons. 90% of the consignments are of 100 or fewer. The point you are making is probably more addressed by the overview taken by the licensing police who deal with the totality of registered firearms dealers' status and registration et cetera.

  Q202  John Barrett: It is a bit of a pressure for joined up government in this sense: I would like to imagine that a quarter of a million assault rifles coming in from Croatia and Bosnia were brought in to be melted down and got rid of because they do not have facilities there to do it; in the same way as we provided facilities in Sierra Leone to melt down weapons where the collections had been organised. I would not like to think that they had leaked on to the streets of my constituency in Leeds, Manchester or London. I would like to know if they have been sold back out from Bosnia to another country. What we are saying is that we do not have an end-use check in Britain and, at the same time, we are putting pressure on the Home Office to cut down the number of guns in Britain.

  Mr Fuchter: Some of the questions you are looking to be addressed would be addressed by the police licensing officer. Our powers stop at dealing with imports. Future sales on are dealt with by the police licensing officer.

  Q203  John Barrett: In the Home Office?

  Mr Fuchter: Under Home Office supervision, yes, very much so. I would like to assure the Committee that there is more joined up government going on than I am painting as a picture but once again I am constrained by the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act in my ability to talk about individual cases.

  Q204  John Barrett: Could we ask a question of the Home Office about their monitoring of the end-use? Would that be the appropriate route for us as parliamentarians to go down?

  Mr Fuchter: That is very likely. It is an issue I would like to talk to the Home Office about certainly at enforcement policy level.

  Chairman: Thank you very much indeed, gentlemen. We are very grateful. There may be a few other questions that we want to write to you about but we do not want to overburden you. You have already kindly offered to write to us about a number of issues. Thank you again and if there are further questions we will write to you immediately and hopefully deal with them.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 August 2007