Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


8-Letter from the Embassy of the People's Republic of China

  I have read the East Asia Report recently published by the Foreign Affairs Committee (FAC) of the House of Commons of the UK and noticed that the Report focuses mainly on China, though it covers various aspects of the development in East Asia. As a Political Counselor of the Embassy, I feel obliged to express my views on it to you and your colleagues.

  I appreciate the Report makes some objective comments on China, especially on China's economic development I feel pleased to notice it makes some positive conclusions, for example, it concludes that the British Government should develop closer links and cooperation with China. However, I have to point out that some conclusions and suggestions are not constructive for the further development of China-UK relations.

  I would like to take few conclusions and recommendations from the report and bring Chinese positions on these issues to your attention. I hope my explanations could help the FAC to understand China better.

Wang Shuying

Political Counselor

Embassy of the People's Republic of China

11 October 2006

Annex 1

I.  REGARDING TAIWAN ISSUE

  The Report concludes that "Chinese military build-up across the Taiwan Straits threatens peace and stability in East Asia". It recommends the British Government to increase contacts with Taiwan at a political level.

  China persists in taking the road of peaceful development. Its development is conducive to the regional peace and stability.

  The Chinese Government adheres to the basic principle of "peaceful reunification and one country, two systems" in handling the Taiwan issue. The purpose of our policies is to oppose and check secession of Taiwan from China, to promote the development of cross-straits relations, to maintain peace and stability across the Taiwan Straits, and to achieve the peaceful reunification of China.

  The "One China" principle is a political foundation of China-UK relations, which was agreed by our two countries when the diplomatic relation was established. It would be against the basic principle should the British Government develop political contacts with the Taiwan Authorities.

II.  REGARDING TIBET ISSUE

  It concludes the Chinese assertion that Dalai Lama advocates Tibetan independence flies in the face of public statements made by Dalai Lama and recommends the British Government to continue to press the Chinese Government to allow Dalai Lama to return to Tibet in his capacity as a spiritual leader.

  It concludes that Beijing's insistence on controlling the appointment of the next Panchen Lama is a serious abuse of the freedom of religion and recommends the British Government to press for the recognition by the Chinese of the right of Tibetan religious leaders and to choose the nest Panchen Lama according to their religious beliefs and practices.

  It concludes that freedom of religious belief and worship in Tibet remains significantly restricted and recommends the British Government to continue to press this issue with its Chinese counterparts, emphasizing the beneficial influence which religious freedom can have on social cohesion.

  Actually Dalai Lama is not only a religious figure, but a political exile engaged in separatist activities. The door for negotiation is always open as long as Dalai Lama truly renounces the ambition of seeking Tibet independence, gives up any separatist activities and publicly recognizes Tibet and Taiwan are inalienable parts of China and the Government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legitimate government representing China.

  The Chinese Government respects and safeguards the freedom of religious belief. The Panchen Lama's appointment should be made after lot-drawing from a Gold Urn and approved by the Central Government of China according to the established religious rituals and historical conventions of Tibetan Buddhism.

  The Central Government and the local government of Tibet signed the Agreement on Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet on 23 May 1951, which explicitly stipulated "The policy of freedom of religious belief shall be carried out in Tibet. The religious beliefs, customs and habits of the Tibetan people shall be protected, and lamaseries shall be protected." The Central Government and governments in Tibet at various levels have since been doing as promised. They respect and protect various religious activities according to the law. This makes it possible for religious believers and people who do not hold any religious belief, and the various sects of Tibetan Buddhism, to live in harmony.

III.  REGARDING HONG KONG ISSUE

  It concludes the package of constitutional changes presented by the Chief Executive in December 2005 was a very limited measure which did not go far enough towards the introduction of representative democracy and universal suffrage.

  It recommends the British Government urge the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to make significant and major steps towards representative democracy and to agree with Beijing on a timetable by which the direct election of the Chief Executive and LegCo by universal suffrage will be achieved.

  Since Hong Kong returned to China, the Central Government of China has been strictly abiding by the Basic Law and fully supporting the Government of the HKSAR in performing their duties by law. Such guidelines as "one country, two systems", "Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong" and a "high degree of autonomy" have all been fully and successfully implemented. The Central Government supports the gradual development of democracy in light of Hong Kong's real situation on the basis of the Basic Law.

  The HKSAR is continuing to maintain stability and prosperity. And its political structure is developing steadily in line with the stipulations of the Basic Law and local people are enjoying increasing democracy and basic human rights. This fact is not only widely recognized by the Hong Kong people, but also fully acknowledged by the international community.

IV.  REGARDING XINJIANG ISSUE

  It concludes the Chinese repressive policies in Xinjiang are reprehensible.

  China is a united multi-ethnic country. Xinjiang is one of the five ethnic autonomous regions in China where organs of self-governing are established for the exercise of autonomy. The Central Government of China has made great efforts to enhance the relationship of equality, unity and mutual assistance among different ethnic groups and to accelerate the development of ethnic autonomous regions. With the support of the Central Government Xinjiang is now in its best development period, which features political stability, fast economic development, stable social order, unity of various ethnic groups, and local people living and working in peace and contentment.

V.  REGARDING HUMAN RIGHTS

  It recommends the British Government to press the Chinese Government to revoke the Regulations Concerning Foreign Journalists and Permanent Offices of Foreign News Agencies before the 2008 Olympic Games, to relax its censorship of the internet and its restrictions on the political content of their pages, to introduce legislation prohibiting courts from accepting evidence procured through torture, to addresses Re-education Through Labour etc.

  Since the reform and opening up, Chinese media and internet have gone through rapid development. Chinese people can now obtain information in a much easier and more convenient manner. We support the healthy and orderly development of internet and have issued relevant regulations in order to protect the rights and interests of the general public.

  The Chinese government protects the rights of Chinese and foreign journalists to report in China and makes great efforts to facilitate their work. Journalists should also abide by local laws and regulations.

  Torture is regarded as severe crime in China. Chinese law strictly prohibits the practice of forcing confessions through torture. Chinese procurators' institutions have set up special offices and assigned special personnel in prisons and detention centers to inspect and supervise whether suspects and prisoners are subject to cruel punishment or other abuses. Chinese law implements the "illegal evidence exclusion principle," that is, evidence obtained by torture, threatening or cheating could not be used as evidence for penalties. Chinese lawmakers will continue to monitor irregular behaviors in judicial areas, such as extracting confession through torture, illegally prolonged detention, unaffordable litigation fee and insufficient implementation of court's ruling.

  Re-education through labor is not a criminal penalty, but a kind of administrative detention enacted to carry out compulsory reform through education for those who have committed minor offences or anti-social behaviors which are not eligible for punishment in accordance with criminal law. Its main purpose is to transform them into self-reliant people as well as to maintain public security, and to prevent and reduce crimes. With regard to people who need reeducation through labor, their cases should be approved by commissions in charge of reeducation through labor affiliated to the people's governments at the provincial level, at the level of municipalities directly under the Central Government or at the level of large and medium-size cities. The duration of reeducation through labor normally should not exceed one year. Those people under reeducation through labor enjoy the right of voting, freedom of religion, personal dignity etc. Their legal property and freedom of communication are protected by law.

VI.  REGARDING CHINA'S FOREIGN POLICIES

  It concludes the growing links between Russia and China may signal the emergence of an authoritarian bloc opposed to democracy and Western values in Eurasia. The Shanghai Co-operation Organization has the potential to evolve into an alliance of authoritarian powers opposed to the West and may aid China's efforts to establish control over Central Asian energy reserves.

  It concludes China's policy towards resources threatens the market-based mechanisms on which Western states rely for supply and Beijing's attitude to business with states which the international community has condemned for their behaviors damages efforts to uphold international standards in human rights and good governance.

  It recommends the British Government work within the EU to maintain the arms embargo on China.

  China and Russia are committed to develop the long-term and stable good-neighborly relations of friendship and mutually beneficially cooperation between the two countries on the basis of non-alliance, non-confrontation and not targeting at any third country.

  The purposes of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization are strengthening mutual trust and good-neighborly relations among member states, promoting their effective cooperation in various fields like political, trade, energy, environment protection etc; jointly safeguarding and preserving regional peace, security and stability; striving towards creation of a democratic, just, reasonable new international political and economic order. The fact proves that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is conducive to the regional peace and stability.

  China will unswervingly follow the road of peaceful development. Its policy on resources is also based on market-based mechanisms. China is willing to make joint efforts with the rest of the world to create a harmonious world with everlasting peace and common prosperity.

  China and African countries have treated each other with sincerity and enjoyed mutual support. The cooperation is conducted on the basis of equality and mutual benefit, safeguarding sovereignty and independence, promoting social and economic development. China is committed to peaceful development. Africa is committed to achieving stability and rejuvenation. Stronger ties between China and Africa will contribute to South-South cooperation and international peace and development.

  The Chinese Government has repeatedly elaborated on China's position on the removal of EU's arms embargo against China. It is a kind of political discrimination against China and not in line of the good relations between China and EU. The out-dated embargo should have long been removed. The early removal is conducive to further development of China-EU relations.



GIFTING OF EQUIPMENT


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 June 2007