Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Annex 2

Do we have evidence that specialist nurses are being targeted for redundancies? and/or that they are doing generalised work rather than specialist work?

  2.1  In the first half of the financial year, there were 135 nurse redundancies (15%) of the total compulsory redundancies in the NHS. We do not collect a more detailed breakdown since the title specialist nurse covers a number of roles, titles and bands. There are the NMC registered specialist practitioner roles such as Health Visitors, School Nurses, and Learning Disability Nurses, and there are specialist roles, such as cancer or MS nurses, where significant post registration training is required and not all are readily identifiable in standard workforce collections.

  2.2  It is for local trusts in partnership with local stakeholders to determine how best to use their funds to meet national and local priorities for improving health and to commission services accordingly, this includes provision of such posts and the deployment of specialist nurses. There is anecdotal evidence that some trusts are looking critically at specialist posts to ensure they are targeted in the right areas, are productive and are meeting service needs. There is also some evidence of specialist neurological nurse posts being cut or transferred to generalist roles as part of organisations' cost savings plans.

  2.3  I would like to reiterate the comments I made to the committee. Specialist nurses are crucial to the reform programme and organisations will not make the type of change we want to see without using specialist nurses


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 22 March 2007