Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Supplementary evidence submitted by the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (WP36A)

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) is the professional, educational and trade union body for the 47,000 chartered physiotherapists, physiotherapy assistants and students in the UK

SUMMARY

  2.  NHS workforce planning has put few resources into future demand forecasting for the smaller professions such as the Allied Health Professions (AHPs) or healthcare scientists. The considerable effort at forecasting made during the development of the NHS Plan in 2000 has not been sustained. Any work has concentrated on nurses and multiple medical specialties. AHPs have been subject recently to poor guess work not workforce planning.

  3.  This is against a background of an increase in demand for physiotherapy as a consequence of the many Department of Health (DH) policy initiatives since the publication of the NHS Plan. These include: delivery of the 18 week wait; primary care developments; faster access to treatment via patient self referral; increased rehabilitation and independence provision; meeting the needs of older people; the Musculoskeletal Services Framework; and recognition of the value of prompt intervention in order to reduce the number of people requiring incapacity benefit.

  4.  Graduate employment problems are serious in physiotherapy, speech and language therapy, dietetics; occupational therapy; nursing and midwifery. The problems in physiotherapy:

    —  are not caused by too many physiotherapists. The present output is in approximately in accordance with the NHS Plan.

  5.  The problems are caused by:

    —  the NHS deficit reduction programme; resulting in many frozen posts (and some eliminated) which would have been suitable for new graduates;

    —  the creation of senior posts by Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) instead of planning new junior posts;

    —  the senior post vacancies have been filled by a flow of overseas (including Europe) physiotherapists of around 1,200 pa. in 2004 and 2005; and

    —  serious failure by Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) and trusts to take responsibility for the new graduates they have commissioned.

SOLUTIONS

  6.  The CSP is seeking the following solutions:

    —  increased resources into future demand forecasting for AHPs and scientists in particular around national co-ordination and at SHA level;

    —  "unfreezing" physiotherapy posts;

    —  removal of physiotherapy from the Home Office shortage occupation list; and

    —  a 1 year guarantee of jobs for new graduates with a view to ensuring that new graduates are not lost from the NHS.

RECRUITMENT, RETENTION AND WORKFORCE PLANNING

  7.  There has been a serious lack of resources put into future demand forecasting for physiotherapy, other AHPs or healthcare scientists. The exception to this was the work undertaken in forecasting for the NHS Plan in 2000. However, in recent times this focus on the future of the smaller professions has not been maintained. Since 2000 the number of physiotherapy posts expanded substantially; and traditionally there were many vacant posts. The impact of measures to address NHS deficits has resulted in many frozen posts and some post reductions in physiotherapy and most other professions.

  8.  A workforce survey of physiotherapy managers was undertaken by the CSP in July 2006.  Responses covered nearly half the physiotherapy workforce in England. Managers were asked about the numbers of vacant and frozen posts within their physiotherapy service and this revealed that in total 4.7% of funded establishment posts were vacant on 30 June 2006.  Taking account of numbers of part time roles, and allowing for non-respondents, it is calculated that across the UK 1,215 physiotherapists would be needed to fill all vacant posts.

  9.  This is far in excess of the 1.1% vacancy rate reported by the DH in its latest vacancy survey (31st March 2006) and, being closer to the "coal face" represents a much more accurate picture of the true extent of vacant posts in physiotherapy. The DH survey only records posts which have been vacant for three months or more and which employers are actively trying to fill. This therefore completely disregards any frozen posts or posts which employers have stopped advertising due to lack of applicants. The numbers of job freezes imposed as a result of the financial problems affecting the NHS has reduced turnover and impacted on the numbers of Band 5 posts available for new graduates.

  10.  In Spring 2006, using the Freedom of Information Act, the CSP obtained copies of the information submitted by SHAs at the request of the WRT on future demand for physiotherapy. The CSP was concerned to learn that the SHAs were only asked to supply predicted figures and were not asked to justify or explain how they had reached those totals. Furthermore, when questioned by the CSP, few senior physiotherapy managers had known that this information had been requested or had been asked to input their views to the process. Eleven out of 28 SHAs had not submitted information on future demand, including all (of the then) five London SHAs. Few SHAs had separate data for physiotherapists. This exercise resulted in predicted expansion in 2006-10 of just 1,648 wte. physiotherapists in England—the fact that the same figure has been given for both headcount and wte. also has caused the CSP concern about the accuracy of these predictions and how much background work had gone into their calculation. Yet it was this less than robust information that led the WRT to conclude that there may be an oversupply of physiotherapists if current commissioning levels are not reduced.

  11.  The CSP was extremely concerned by the reports of the draft DH workforce planning document that was leaked to the Health Service Journal (4 January 2007). Although reported comments by Andy Burnham MP, Minister of State, that this was an early draft might have been intended to reassure, the reported predicted levels of oversupply of 16,200 AHPs and scientific technical and therapeutic staff (ST&Ts) by 2010/11 have not been dismissed. Of equal concern is that there has been no explanation of how such a conclusion was arrived at, especially as it represents an "about turn" in DH policy as set out in the NHS Plan. To produce a "headline" figure for such an amalgamation of professions indicates how little resource has been invested in workforce planning for these professions since the extensive work done in producing Investment and Reform for NHS Staff—Taking forward the NHS Plan.

  12.  The CSP has been unable to obtain any details of the proportion of the predicted oversupply that physiotherapists would constitute. According to the DH Workforce Census figures for September 2005 physiotherapists form around 14.5% of this group. On this basis the DH prediction would imply that around 2,350 wte. physiotherapists (equating to a headcount of 2,800) would be affected.

  13.  Demand for physiotherapy has been increasing for many years. The DH workforce census shows that between 2003 and 2005 alone the workforce in England expanded by 11% or nearly 2,000 physiotherapists. The CSP has supplied detailed evidence to the DH and WRT on the many ways in which expansion of physiotherapy services can contribute to a range of government targets for the NHS across a number of clinical specialties; reduce the workload of GPs and consultants; contribute to achieving the 18 week wait and the 4 hour waiting target for A&E; promote healthy living; reduce the length of hospital stays, etc.

  14.  Out-patient waiting data is not routinely collected by the DH (although Welsh and Scottish Executive bodies do). A "snapshot" telephone survey of over 30 CSP stewards in England (May 2006) confirmed anecdotal concerns raised by members that significant increases in waiting times for physiotherapy treatment are being experienced, with musculoskeletal outpatients the worst affected, but also access to paediatric services, learning disabilities, older patients and those with long-term conditions. Examples include:

    —  in North Staffordshire, waiting times for musculoskeletal outpatients were reported to have increased from 36 weeks to 47 weeks, and waiting times in respiratory from zero to four months;

    —  one trust in the West Midlands reported community physiotherapy waiting times to have increased from one week to six weeks;

    —  in Kent and Yorkshire, waiting times increased to six-seven weeks from two weeks previously, with musculoskeletal, rheumatology and neurology patients most affected;

    —  a doubling of waiting times from four to eight weeks in Thames Valley, Kent and the North West;

    —  in the North East, outpatient waiting times increased up to three months;

    —  in the East Midlands, routine waiting lists reported to have increased to 43 weeks and rising.

  15.  In terms of services being cut or withdrawn, outreach community work in GP surgeries and patients' homes were mentioned the most frequently, but also hydrotherapy services, women's health, mental health, respiratory rehabilitation, amputees, falls and exercise clinics were also being affected

  16.  The issues outlined above highlight the inadequacies of current workforce planning mechanisms and the CSP is keen to work in partnership with the DH and NHS Employers to provide constructive solutions to establish effective and meaningful workforce planning. A strong co-ordinating role in workforce planning should be established at national level. This must be supported by the establishment of a senior post responsible for AHP workforce issues within each SHA to help coordinate and support local activity as well as providing strategic leadership and engaging with education providers

GRADUATE EMPLOYMENT

  17.  The CSP has undertaken regular surveys of employment of physiotherapy graduate since 2004. The DH did not collect such data until quite recently.

  18.  The survey of the employment status of physiotherapists graduating in 2005 (undertaken in January 2006) showed that approximately one third had been unable to find work within the NHS. Whilst it has not been possible to track them all, anecdotal information suggests that many of these have now sought alternative careers and are lost to the profession and to the health service.

  19.  A survey of those graduating in 2006 revealed that in July around 93% had not secured a physiotherapy position. In December a sample survey of the employment status of 706 of the 1,954 physiotherapists who graduated in England in 2006 revealed:

    —  13% had found permanent employment as physiotherapists.

    —  17% had only been able to obtain short-term contracts as physiotherapists.

    —  68% were still seeking their first physiotherapy post.

    —  The remainder were no longer seeking employment as physiotherapists.

  20.  In general, physiotherapy graduates are very flexible in terms of how far they are prepared to move geographically across the UK to take up a post—this has inevitably caused a problem in other parts of the UK. There is also recognition that service provision is moving from the acute to the community sector. Although in the past physiotherapy graduates have traditionally taken up their first post in the acute sector they are both competent and willing to begin their career in the community. The CSP is therefore concerned that both the DH and NHS Employers continue to state that physiotherapy graduates need to be more flexible in where they are prepared to work. The problem is a serious lack of any suitable physiotherapy posts to apply for as evidenced by managers reporting receiving up to 100 or more applications for each "newly qualified" post.

  21.  The CSP remains extremely concerned that:

    —  At a cost of around £30,000 to train a physiotherapist, £40 million pounds of taxpayers' money will have been wasted if 68% of English graduates are unable to find physiotherapy posts.

    —  Due to the current financial situation within the NHS in England, many of those who have obtained short term contracts may find that their contracts are not renewed in order to help meet the vigorous financial savings targets that are being imposed in many trusts. Junior physiotherapy posts traditionally have a high turnover, with junior physiotherapists seeking to expand their experience in a variety of settings. As these posts fall vacant they become vulnerable to being frozen and cut.

    —  It is now six months since the majority of these physiotherapists graduated and they will soon face increased competition for posts from the 2,250 (over 2,600 across the UK) physiotherapists due to graduate in England in 2007.

    —  A very clear commitment to expand the physiotherapy workforce by 59% between 2000 and 2010 was made by the Government as part of the The NHS Plan—a plan for investment, a plan for reform. This was deliberately planned in recognition of the increasing role physiotherapists have in meeting rising patient demand and helping to realise a variety of key Government manifesto commitments since 1997, such as the 18-week wait. The Plan required a total headcount of 24,800 qualified physiotherapists by 2010. The latest available DH workforce census for England (September 2005) shows that there were 19,997 physiotherapists in post. This means that in order to achieve the target of 24,800 an increase of 24% or 4,803 physiotherapists will be needed. In answer to a written question (Hansard, 29 July 2002, col WA155) Lord Hunt of Kings Heath replied that as at 30 September 2001, there were 16,210 physiotherapists employed in the NHS in England and that projections were that there would be around 8,000 more in 2009. The latest WRT projections exceed this.

  22.  The CSP remains committed to working in partnership with the Department of Health and NHS Employers to resolve this problem. Although dissemination of good practice and encouragement to SHAs and trusts to take action will provide some help, this will only tamper at the edges and will not have a major impact on reducing unemployment. The CSP, along with other health service trade unions and professional bodies is continuing to press for a guarantee of one year's employment for graduates. Only by such direct action can this problem be prevented from escalating. All SHAs and employers must take their share of responsibility for providing employment opportunities, as must third and independent sector providers. If left to good will alone this will not happen.

INTERNATIONAL RECRUITMENT

  23.  During the past few years the high vacancy rates among physiotherapists has resulted in a significant increase in the recruitment of overseas-qualified physiotherapists. Non-EEA citizens requiring work permits to work in the UK are only able to apply for posts which appear on the Home Office shortage occupation list. Since the summer of 2005 junior physiotherapists have been removed from this list in recognition of the large numbers of newly qualified UK physiotherapists who were unable to find jobs.

  24.  The CSP has analysed the figures collected by the Health Professions Council (HPC) of the numbers of non-EEA physiotherapists successfully applying for registration in the UK.

  25.  In 1999 the CSP commissioned a report into the recruitment of international physiotherapists.[48] It has been useful to compare the information on international registrants collected at that time with the current data as highlighted below:

    —  There has been a huge rise in the number of non-UK nationals who have successfully applied for HPC registration since 1999. In that year there were 579 non-UK nationals registered with the then Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine—the forerunner of the HPC. In 2005 there were a total of 1,219 registrants—a rise of 210%.

    —  The country with the biggest increase in registrants is India. In 1999 registrants from India featured only in a category labelled "Other" which totalled 22.  In 2004 there were 432 registrants from India rising to 472 in 2005.

    —  There are also a significant number of registrants from the Africa with 376 applicants in 2004 and a further 245 in 2005.

    —  There has been a fall in the numbers being registered from Australia, from 256 in 1999 to 151 in 2004 and 178 in 2005.  Numbers from New Zealand have dropped slightly from 90 in 1999 to 70 in 2005.  Many of these physiotherapists use working holiday visas rather than work permits to obtain physiotherapy posts in the UK and so will not be affected by the restrictions of the shortage occupation list.

  26.  It is understood that a proposal to remove all physiotherapy posts from the work permit shortage list is now with Ministers—this was first mooted by the DH in June last year. The CSP has supported this move on the basis that this will help to create more vacancies at Band 6 and above and will allow more movement of physiotherapists from Band 5 posts, thus freeing up more posts for new graduates. More physiotherapists will be needed to fill the vacancies that will be created in future once non-EEA physiotherapists are no longer able to apply for jobs in the UK.

CONCLUSIONS

  27.  Whilst workforce planning across the health service will never be easy, it is disappointing that so little effort appears to be made in the case of physiotherapy or indeed other AHPs, as the FoI request revealed. Given that the Government has done much to rightly to take advantage of the skills that physiotherapists employ in an increasing range of treatments and settings to complement the ongoing reform programme, not to try to adequately quantify this growing demand is difficult to understand.

  28.  The supply of physiotherapists, had until this month, been a much more straightforward matter. The Government had shown real courage with the NHS Plan in 2000 in seeking to implement a strategy that looked beyond the next General Election, indeed beyond the next two. This enabled the profession, the NHS and the academic institutions to produce the necessary number of physiotherapy graduates to support the investment in and reforms to the health service. With a three-year training period, longer for other health professionals such as doctors, the certainty of working to such a plan was a significant improvement for all concerned—not least patients. The draft workforce strategy report leaked earlier this month challenges the NHS Plan and does so without appearing to have any basis for suggesting hugely differing workforce demand. Against a background of the impact that trying to return the NHS to financial equilibrium over too short a period has had, it is questionable whether there is any workforce strategy other than a return to a "boom and bust" approach.

Phil Gray

Chief Executive, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy

January 2007





48   International Recruitment of Physiotherapists, Buchan & O'May, 2000. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 22 March 2007