Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by Attend (PPI 163)

1.1  WHO WE ARE

  The members of Attend (the umbrella body) whose members are best known as of Leagues of Friends have been supporting the local delivery of health since well before the NHS was founded.

  Traditionally the contribution is dismissed as part of the "Jam and Jerusalem" culture. However in 2006, from a national survey of its members, Attend is able to evidence:

  It has 31,000 active members £47 million was raised to support services. 11,000,000 hours of volunteering were given which at the national minimum wage is equivalent to £5.35 per hour which equates to a further £58 million.

  Such a contribution is more than just good intentions, and represents both enormous goodwill and fundamental support to the delivery of health in local communities.

1.2  IS VOLUNTEER SUPPORT ENDURING?

  In the last five years the WRVS have indicated that their numbers of active volunteers has dropped from 95,000 to 60,000. The numbers of volunteers working with Attend has also dropped from 38,000 to 31,000.

  Additionally, Professor Colin Rochester from Roehampton University advises us that 75% of volunteers in health and social care are aged 50 or over, and that they are doing 80% of the volunteering hours. His conclusion is that younger people are more selectively and less fully engaged in the field (December 2006).

  However, while these figures are challenging enough, they hide a significant shift away from the big hospital institution and greater support of the less bureaucratic, service delivery organisations.

  Positively, as part of Health Month (January 2007), Attend carried out a survey of the public in hospital perceptions of volunteering to support the NHS. The sample set was over 1000 of which 90% strongly agreed, or agreed that volunteers should support the NHS.

  Further 55% of respondents recognised and supported the concept of volunteers being involved in monitoring of services.

2.1  ISSUES THAT ENCOURAGE AND DISCOURAGE VOLUNTEERS IN SOCIETY TODAY

  Volunteers need to feel that their contribution is valued; aspects of this could be highlighted as:

    (i)  The Opportunity to Make a Genuine Difference

    If people are to give their time, particularly if they are younger/professionals they wish to see a direct and tangible outcome for their volunteering. Just being part of committee (which once had worth and status) is not particularly valued today.

    (ii)  A clear understanding of what is required

    Every time a change occurs a significant cohort of volunteers will choose to leave.

    Any change can be seen as a negative evaluation of a previous contribution.

    Also if volunteers are feeling disenchanted or undervalued, it is an opportunity to opt out.

    (iii)  Appropriate Leadership

    Leading volunteers and the quality of that leadership is vital to the sense of vision and the achievement of objectives.

    The appointment of the leaders and their ongoing support and training is required.

    (iv)  Tangible Benefits

    Increasingly volunteers are looking for tangible benefits from their contribution. Traditionally, this has been confined to recognition, but increasing accreditation and recognised training are seen as vital to support volunteers.

    (v)  Focused Support

    In the "new world" of volunteering, volunteers are less interested in fulfilling infrastructure roles. Increasingly paid staff are required to work in tandem, fulfilling roles previously carried out by volunteers such as minute taking, letter writing and negotiation.

3.1  SPECIFIC SUGGESTIONS FOR THE FUTURE OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

(i)   Opportunity to make a genuine difference

  Currently, there is little public recognition of PPI Forums, and no real understanding of the difference between them and CHC's.

  Alongside there has been other new initiatives e.g. PFIs and PALs all of which crowd into the public consciousness and add to the general confusion.

  If new enthusiastic volunteers, unencumbered by history are sought, the unique selling point of LINks needs to be clearly articulated.

(ii)   A clear understanding of what is required

  Attend has undertaken training for the Department of Health, the Home Office, the Cabinet Office and the Welsh Assembly.

  It recommends that the HR model is adopted with clear definitions of each role performed and an associated person specification clearly indicating skills, knowledge and attitudes.

  A rigorous selection and matching exercise should be undertaken.

  There should be compulsory induction with core skills training.

  There should be a robust review (appraisal) system.

(iii)   Appropriate leadership

  Attend co-ordinates a training consortium (WRVS, CSV, NAVSM, NIMHE, Red Cross, St John, Macmillan and Age Concern) to train their volunteer managers. They come from a variety of backgrounds and some are paid others are volunteers.

  This outlines essential skills and techniques in managing volunteers, and offers and NVQ level 3 and affiliation to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development as an outcome.

(iv)   Tangible benefits

  Accredited training for volunteers which recognises volunteer hours, skills gained will particularly encourage the diversification of the volunteers group.

(v)   Focused support

  Providing the appropriate support doesn't have to be expensive: Attend supports 800 groups on a UK wide basis with 14 staff, and has a turnover of less than £1,500,000.

  A delivery rather than bureaucratic model could produce both and effective and efficient support, but also provide a degree of quality assurance and unfortunately in an England-wide basis.

Attend

February 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 20 April 2007