Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Evidence submitted by Dr Albert Day, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust (PPI 156)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.  Effective PPI gives patients and the public an increased understanding and awareness of local health decision making, thereby gaining local ownership of strategy and service change. For clinicians and non-clinical managers alike, PPI is a means of transformational leadership. Developing a constructive relationship and strong partnership with the local health community through effective communication is essential.

  2.  Models of effective PPI within Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust are explored, emphasising the value of the Board of Governors and the multi-facetted Quality of Patient Experience group. I will contend LINks should retain and build on the best of the Patients Forum and its forerunner Community Health Council namely local knowledge with independence. There is some potential for duplication as between LINKs and the Board of Governors.

INTRODUCTION TO DR ALBERT DAY

  3.  Dr Day is qualified in medicine and medical law. He was a General Practitioner and vocational trainer in Harrogate for 20 years and occupational health physician to the Harrogate group of hospitals. He was a research assistant and hospital practitioner in rheumatology.

  4.  Dr Day moved from clinical medicine to a career in legal medicine in 1987. He was Head of Medical Services at Medical Protection Society. He acted as adviser to the ethics committee of the College of Occupational Therapists. He is a Council member of the section of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal Society of Medicine, a founding Fellow of the forensic and legal faculty of the Royal College of Physicians and a Fellow of the Royal College of General Practitioners. He served as a Magistrate in Harrogate for 16 years.

  5.  Dr Day was appointed a Non-executive Director of Harrogate Health Care NHS Trust in 1993, and Chairman in 2001 thus taking a central role in the transition to Foundation Trust status. Dr Day takes a keen interest in risk management and governance matters. He chairs both the Board of Directors and the Board of Governors of Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust.

What is the purpose of patient and public involvement?

  6.  A glimpse into the history of health and social care in local communities will inevitably confirm the depth and strength of ownership and pride that was, and is, present in the minds of the majority as regards "their" hospital. In planning the National Health Service, as Hansard records, Parliament was mindful of the need to use and develop local services within the framework of a national service. In Harrogate for example the archives of the General Hospital and the Royal Bath Hospital are replete with evidence of genuine concern for the welfare of the population and that the hospital should thrive as a community facility. There are fascinating minutes of the early managers, then called governors and of the standards they required for example of the Matron and others.

  7.  When Parliament legislated to introduce NHS Foundation Trusts, one of the attractions for me personally and for my organisation in preparing its application was local accountability, an enhanced opportunity to draw on involvement from the local community to shape its health service. Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust (HDFT) is totally committed to delivering a high quality acute secondary care service that reflects the needs of local patients and their carers. The patient experience is our core focus.

  8.  I believe one element of the success of this organisation is our continuing focus on effective patient and public involvement. HDFT can claim huge support and interest from the public, indeed an exemplary record of PPI.

A MEMBERSHIP ORGANISATION

  9.  We are a membership organisation. HDFT has almost 15,000 members—about 10% of those whom we serve have chosen to join. Membership clearly matters to them. The return in our most recent elections to our Board of Governors, in September 2006, showed that 46% of our members voted. The Foundation Trust enjoys regular and disparate support from more than 800 volunteers. The Board of Governors comprises 15 elected and six nominated governors. Elected governors (11) are from public constituencies and the four staff constituencies. Public constituencies are coterminous with those of local government and ensure that all areas are represented. The work of the Board of Governors that I consider crucial in our PPI strategy is described below; it includes activity to balance the geographical and age profile of the membership.

What form of public and patient involvement is desirable, practical and offers good value for money?

  10.  At HDFT we are proud of our strategy for encouraging an increasing number of patients and the public to become involved in the development of their local hospital. We encourage patients and public involvement through both formal and informal mechanisms such as patient feedback on the wards or in outpatient clinics, comments from our membership and our Governors, comments and questions raised through our public Board of Governor meetings, the PALS service, patient focus groups, patient questionnaires and surveys, audits, readers panels and the formal complaints route.

PPI strategy

  11.  What strategy has the Board of Directors to ensure that patient and public involvement is real, and valued? Quite simply the Board requires all internal plans to have input from service users or advisory groups. Our Foundation Office maintains data from questionnaires collected from our membership on their areas of special interest and ways in which individuals have said they are ready to offer advice. Patient special interest groups, expert patients, and complainants are all added to the mix. Service delivery and performance is routinely reported to the monthly Board of Directors; each quarter a report from the Quality of Patient Experience Group includes examples of how comments from service users have been incorporated in developing the service. That group includes members of the Foundation Trust working in a lay capacity as well as Governors.

  12.  Effective PPI gives patients and the public an increased understanding and awareness of local health decision making, thereby gaining local ownership of strategy and service change. For clinicians and non-clinical managers alike, PPI is a means of transformational leadership. Developing a constructive relationship and strong partnership with the local health community through effective communication is essential. At HDFT, PPI is not about ticking boxes, but is embedded in the culture of the organisation.

  13.  Face to face contact is undoubtedly the most productive means of engaging health professionals with the public and patients. It offers a real opportunity for ownership and understanding of potentially complex issues.

  14.  The Foundation Trust offers and encourages a wide range of opportunities:

    —    Become involved as a lay representative on a range of health committees or advisory groups.

    —    Become involved on our patient reader panel—reviewing literature to ensure it is fit for purpose.

    —    Become involved in volunteering including tailored opportunities which may lead to vocational choices.

    —    Become a member of the Foundation Trust, receiving a quarterly letter from the Chairman.

    —    "Foundation News" magazine to all Trust members Introduces PPI initiatives.

    —    Attend our interactive Medicine for Members sessions.

    —    Attend the Board of Governors Meetings.

    —    Attend our annual hospital Open Event and AGM.

    —    Stand as a Governor and work on task and finish projects.

    —    Attend our quarterly Governor surgeries.

    —    Take part in patient focus groups and audit of patient experience initiatives.

    —    Get involved in specialty groups on chronic diseases or disabilities.

    —    Get involved in patient interviews/stories.

  A range of additional PPI mechanisms at HDFT include:

    —    Questionnaires and patient satisfaction surveys relating to a range of services.

    —    PALS encounters.

    —    HDFT inbox—where patients and the public can leave comments, ask questions. Make suggestions etc.

Value for money

  15.  In headline terms, PPI is free of charge. In fact it carries its own overhead, requires servicing and management time. Outputs may have financial consequences. Effective PPI is undoubtedly superb value for money—but loose planning, tokenism and failure to use the outputs would erode trust from patients and the public quickly. In short there must be some point to every activity. Are there examples of good VFM? In my Trust I would cite our Quality of Patient Experience Group (QPEG) and the Board of Governors as excellent models. Each takes from the best elements of the former Community Health Council that many of us found an effective body and develops them further. The Board of Governors has a democratic mandate; it is truly representative. It is economic: The cost of the Board of Governors is principally the cost of elections. The repayment is handsome in terms of energy, engagement and scrutiny as well as the effective discharge of the various statutory duties. The QPEG comprises professional NHS staff, non executive directors, governor, patients' forum, voluntary sector leaders and a service user. Its focus is on delivering the PPI strategy in a way that is meaningful for patients and the public, underpinned by real community engagement, particularly through representation from the voluntary and not-for-profit sectors locally. The Board of Directors uses input from QPEG as part of the annual planning cycle.

PPI and the board of governors

  16.  I am clear that the Board of Governors has a number of roles, PPI being one of them. Accordingly governors are engaged widely in designing, implementing and analysing PPI schemes. To give some examples: Our Membership Development group is tasked this year with work to attract more members in the younger age range. In collaboration with a group on publications it has re-worked the reading material, then passed it to a members' reading panel for a critique. Governors are equipped to attend and speak at relevant meetings such as youth clubs, mother and toddler groups. Governors are thus entrusted with the roles of ambassador and recruiting sergeant.

  17.  One major PPI activity each year is our Annual Open Event. In 2006 for example we had in excess of eight hundred members of the public visiting the event. Governors are part of the planning team, there are three objectives: The day is to be educational, interactive and interesting with a take home health message from each of the 48 displays and tours. It is an opportunity for questions to be put to front line staff, to see what makes NHS care so comprehensive. Staff tell me it is fun and I see on their faces that PPI is a positive experience.

  18.  A hugely popular Governor initiative is our "Medicine for Members" series that is designed around a list of topics suggested by members. Recent examples are prevention and control of hospital infection; pain management; elderly people's care; hospital catering; emergency medicine. Every session is chaired by a governor who leads a lively debate.

  LINKs

  19.  The increasing number of foundation trusts, each with its Board of Governors/Council of Members offers an effective and ever-greater democratic mechanism whereby the public and patients have a real stake in their local health service. Involvement and a say in the wider network of local services including voluntary services across a specific geographical area is demonstrably strengthened through the foundation trust model.

  20.  The Patients' Forum has at its heart total independence; LINKs should in my view maintain that, as well as local knowledge. LINKs performs a different role from that of the Board of Governors. Governors receive regular detailed information from the Board of Directors, with data and presentations continuously reinforcing their ability to discuss matters with the membership from a position of factual knowledge. For example all press releases are sent to Governors before release, with a briefing note as necessary. The Chairman's monthly Governors' briefing is complemented by a copy of all Chief Executive staff briefings.

  21.  Governors set their agenda and are proactive, assisted by joint meetings of the Boards of Directors and Governors on strategic issues. The objective of my communication strategy is to ensure timely accurate local knowledge, the most powerful public relations tool of all. Questions and/or concerns from members that come to Governors are handled by channeling them through the Foundation trust office. A swift response to both governor and member may be followed by inclusion in a general briefing at the month end.

  22.  Governors are local people. Not only do stakeholder governors bring their own personal qualities to the Board but their inclusion ensures two things: input to the debate from different external perspectives and feedback to the nominated body to which they belong. The strengthening of a local health community from collaborative dialogue with commissioners is obvious. How much better when Governors are part of that and have the knowledge required. To that extent I believe Governors fulfill the role that LINKs has in commissioner organisations. If foundation trusts increase their number of nominated governors to include LINKs, an extra public governor must be added to maintain its majority; a decision for each FT. It seems obvious that a LINKs person would attend the public Board of Governors meetings (as our patients forum representative does at present) and work in our QPEG.

Conclusion

  23.  PPI is not an addition to the work of this Trust, it is a core function. I have set out our philosophy of inclusiveness; drawing on the experience and energy of patients, carers, volunteers and complainants to enrich the patient journey of tomorrow. LINKs could add to our pool of feedback and dialogue by working alongside the Board of Governors and directly into specific PPI groups. The question of whether there is a different role for LINKs in a PCT, more particularly one that combines a provider and commissioner role remains.

Dr Albert T Day

Chairman, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust

January 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 20 April 2007