Select Committee on International Development Ninth Special Report


Annex 1: Lessons learnt from under-spendof The "PREVENTING HIV/AIDS Project" (PHP)


These lessons are drawn from the independent mid-term project review and the recent Country Programme Review carried out by DFID's Evaluation Department.

Lesson 1: Government ownership and leadership is important for good project implementation.

During the first two years, 2004-2005, PHP was co-managed by Ministry of Health [MOH] and the World Health Organization [WHO]. Division of responsibility and accountability was not clear, resulting in delays in decision-making, project implementation and expenditure. A key lesson is that WHO lacks the delegated authority to effectively manage large-scale programmes.

In response, in 2006, DFID transferred sole management to MOH, retaining WHO's technical assistance role. Under Government management, the project is expanding coverage of activities and disbursement is starting to increase. In 2005, the project reached 40.4% of street-based sex workers, increasing to 96.8% in 2006. In 2005, the project distributed 200,000 needles and syringes, increasing to 1.5 million in 2006 and still rising. Decentralizing implementation to provinces is helping accelerate disbursement, with more attention focused on strengthening provincial implementation capacity.

Lesson 2: An enabling policy and legal environment is important for effective delivery of HIV prevention programmes for at risk groups

PHP targets harm-reduction and high-risk groups — sex-workers and intravenous drug-users. This sensitive pilot work outside the law led to slow disbursement as peer educators faced police harassment while distributing condoms and clean needles and syringes.

The Government of Vietnam passed the Law on HIV/AIDS in 2006, legalising harm-reduction and institutionalizing coordination among health, police and social affairs in combating HIV/AIDS. This enabling policy environment facilitates the work of PHP. PHP instantly scaled up needle and syringe distribution from 1.5 million in 2006 to 10 million [planned] in 2007. It demonstrates how DFID can be a catalyst to support pioneering prevention work that lays the foundation for scaling up.

Lesson 3: Flexible staffing is important to ensure adequate DFID capacity to tackle implementation difficulties.

Initially, DFID Bangkok provided advisory support to PHP. In response to rising implementation challenges, DFID allocated dedicated in-country advisory capacity in 2006 to support hands-on management demands. This has improved project delivery and disbursement, supported and strengthened government leadership and enhanced working with other donors.

Department for International Development

17 September 2007


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 18 October 2007