Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Together for Peace

  We are an independent, non-affiliated British group seeking to be actively engaged with the situation in Palestine and Israel. However, for simplicity we have grouped ourselves underneath the banner of Together for Peace (www.togetherforpeace.co.uk) for which two of us work, and with which there is a large degree of overlap.

  We are currently in Palestine and Israel for 2+ weeks (two of us not for the first time), fact-finding, building up relationships with people from different communities, building links for twinning Leeds with communities and institutions out here, and promoting greater awareness among our communities and networks in the UK.

  We have spent time with the following people and organisations during the trip, several of whom have actively partnered with us in compiling this report:

    —  Wi'am grassroots peacebuilding project, Bethlehem (www.planet.edu/alaslah).

    —  Tent of Nations, near Nahhalin (www.tentofnations.org).

    —  Taayush (www.taayush.org) Israeli-led peace movement (especially Ezra Yitzhak).

    —  Badil Resource Centre for Palestinian Residency and Refugees' Rights (www.badil.org).

    —  Prisoners' Association, Bethlehem.

    —  Givat Haviva peace education centre (www.givathaviva.org).

    —  Fayez Saqqa, MLC for Bethlehem (Fatah).

    —  Palestinian Polytechnic University, Hebron: students and staff.

    —  Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH).

    —  Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT), Hebron.

    —  Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD).

    —  Women's Community Centre, Lajee Centre (www.lajee.org) and Ayed Al-Azar, Aida refugee camp, Bethlehem.

    —  Lucy Palazzo, a US national currently investigating legal issues surrounding settlements in the West Bank.

  We have also spent informal time with friends, associates, internationals and NGOs (including Jewish Israelis), all of whose insights and perspectives have informed our report.

  We have split our time between the southern West Bank (primarily Bethlehem and Hebron) and Jerusalem, and also toured around the far south of the West Bank (Twani, Karmel, Susiya, Al Burj, Pene Hever) especially visiting Palestinians living in close—and highly tense—proximity to Israeli settlements.

  We are shocked by the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories and would strongly urge DFID to review and change its policies and strategies.

  Finally, we are neither experienced report writers, nor have we had as much time to compile this report as we would have liked. However, we are very happy to be contacted for further enquiries or to give oral evidence to the committee. Even more so though, several of our partners (listed above) who are living in Palestine and so are far better informed than us, are also very happy to be given the opportunity to speak with the committee. (Which might need to be conducted by telephone, as leaving the West Bank is complex and costly.)

SUMMARY:

    —  The suspension of aid to the PA seems to be causing massive social disruption and frustration. It is not having the effect of weakening support for Hamas, but is only serving to deepen social divisions and economic problems.

    —  The separation barrier and the other controls on the movement of goods and people are causing profound social and economic effects within the West Bank. From small villages to the large trading centres, economic activity is being restricted and livelihoods are suffering.

    —  Controls on the movement of people and vehicles are limiting the delivery of humanitarian and emergency medical assistance in some areas. Organizations such as the UN, Red Crescent & TIPH are now having difficulty gaining access to many Israeli controlled areas of the West Bank.

    —  Palestinian use of new roads linking settlements across the West Bank is limited due to the deterrence of checkpoints, permits and Israeli vehicle registration, as well as the prohibitions placed on Palestinian use of some roads.

    —  Harassment and intimidation of Palestinians by Israeli settlers is widespread with resulting effects on access to land, freedom of movement and economic activity for Palestinians.

    —  There are ongoing situations where Palestinian children travelling to and from school are harassed by Israeli settlers, necessitating accompaniment of the children by internationals.

    —  The ability of the Palestinian people to assert land rights in the face of either settlement expansion or separation wall construction is critical to achieving a just political solution to the conflict.

PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

  The following information is presented in response to some of the 10 issues raised by the inquiry.

Issue 1: The impact of the suspension of aid to the Palestinian Authority and the impact of the temporary international mechanism for Palestinian basic needs, agreed by the Quartet and the European Council

  1. The suspension of aid to the PA seems to be causing massive social disruption and frustration. 140,000 of the total 160,000 public workers have now not received wages for 7+ months and many (including all teachers) are now striking until some resolution is reached. People we spoke to felt strongly that if anything this was creating a siege mentality among Palestinians that was far from weakening support for Hamas, and only serving to deepen social divisions, problems, etc. Apart from pervasive, low-level problems, a specific example is the gathering resentment against communities still receiving services (such as the refugee communities, whose education and health needs are largely provided by the UN in addition to Fatah-dominated village councils and municipalities).

  2. Also, with such a large percentage of the overall workforce dependent on state wages, these measures have obviously had a significant effect upon the economy in general (because many people cannot afford to buy anything but essentials, if that). This clearly adds to the already major problem of aid dependency.

  3. Construction on a $20 million USAID project to provide a sewage piping network for Palestinian towns and villages in the Yatta area of the West Bank has been at a standstill since the project was halted following the victory of Hamas in the PA elections. We witnessed a storage site for the project containing large quantities of piping along with heavy machinery.

  4. During our stay in the Palestinian Territory we have managed to gather some information regarding the on-going breakdown of the Palestinian society primarily due to the cutoff of international aid and the resulting strike. The following matrix includes some of these effects on the social, security, education, health, economics and civil affairs:

Education

    —  Increased pressure on private educational institutions as well as UNRWA schools as PA employees who hold refugee cards are placing their children in UNRWA-administered schools due to the strike in the PA-administered schools. For rich people they moved their children to private schools or Islamic affiliated schools.

    —  Tawjihi students are falling behind fast.

    —  Students of the 10th grade are especially going to face difficult times as a new curriculum is being introduced.

    —  Child labour is increasing among students, in which some of them are selling stuff and goods at road intersections.

    —  Increase in the number of students who collect IDF detritus (especially iron materials) to be sold at low prices.

    —  Damage to school property and assets as students are using the school as a playground for longer perios than they used to in the past. The absence of a school guard might encourage the children to raid the school and cause damage to it.

    —  Teachers are looking for external jobs and are willing to emigrate.

    —  Teachers are taking odd jobs (taxis drivers, labor in Israel...) to guarantee income for their families.

    —  Teachers are less respected by their students.

    —  It is expected that a large participation of teachers (and PA employees in general) will participate heavily in the olive picking season to find an alternative source of income.

    —  Teachers are having to home farm to provide income for their families.

    —  Some teachers head towards Israel for illegal employment.

Security

    —  Increased bribery for policemen, especially traffic policemen.

    —  Loss of legitimacy of police action in the eye of the residents.

    —  Law enforcement measures have been reduced to a large degree.

    —  Increased reliance on traditional tribal law as fighting between families is on the rise.

    —  Law enforcement personnel are looking for private enterprises and other alternative sources of income.

    —  The increased competition between Fatah and Hamas has raised the price of weapons which might tempt some law enforcement personnel to sell their weaponries.

    —  Increased incidents of blackmail and threats of kidnapping in return for a ransom. Internationals are not excluded.

    —  Increased criminal incidents and possibility of house burglary.

    —  Security personnel are not joining their troops in the set times and dates. Resentment of the chain of command among lower ranks.

    —  Prisoners are becoming a burden on security agencies guarding them.

Health

    —  In governmental hospitals, only life saving units are not on strike: dialysis units, cancer units and A+E units.

    —  No immunization is taking place for those wanting to participate in Umra and, if the strike continues, pilgrimage to Mecca.

    —  Private and NGO hospitals are inclined to refuse PA case transfer due to the inability of the PA to meet its financial obligation.

    —  Increase of the use of herbal and traditional medicines.

    —  No large increase in the patient admittance in the private hospitals as they cannot afford to pay for them. This fact gives rise to the impression that a large number of people are suffering quietly and unnoticed.

    —  An increase in the burden on national and international NGOs-affiliated hospitals and clinics. The same is for UNRWA clinics and health facilities.

    —  Private hospitals are requesting down-payments before admitting patients in as there has been an increase in the number of patients leaving the hospital without paying the dues.

    —  Increase in the number of incidents of giving birth at home.

    —  Pharmacies are accumulating debts as patients are unable to pay for their necessary drugs and medications.

    —  Decrease the quantity of medications in the governmental hospitals due to the strike of the central General Stores associated with the Ministry of Health.

    —  Public health will be affected as the smuggling of expired goods is on the increase which might lead to cases of food poisoning.

Economic

    —  No VAT documents have been issued.

    —  The market is filled with expired and smuggled goods.

    —  Increased restrictions on giving loans by commercial banks and other loaning agencies.

    —  The lack of internal revenue for the PA budget. Such revenue used to exceed $300 million a month.

    —  People continued to sell their valued assets (jewelry and land) as to make ends meet.

    —  No import or export authorization.

    —  Non-PA employees are more financially burdened to support their close relatives.

Social

    —  No payment for social cases through the Ministry of Social Affairs.

    —  The Ministry of Social Affairs is not capable of providing the list of hard social cases to any organization that might be intending to provide relief services.

    —  Increase of disputes as more people will not be able to meet their obligations.

    —  Increase of tension and domestic violence as men are no longer seen as producers and breadwinners.

    —  Decrease in social interaction and family visits as no resources are available, mainly in the holy month of Ramadan.

Civil Affairs

    —  No registration of the newborn and marriage certificates.

    —  No immunization due to the lack of birth certificates.

    —  Driving licenses are not being renewed, as well as no car registration, which would also affect the insurance industry.

    —  No issuance of passports which affects patients and students who wish to pursue their education abroad as well those going to do pilgrimage, among others. There has been a number of cases of patients with cancer who cannot access Jordan, Egypt or any other countries for medications due to lack of passports. It has been the case that the Ministry of Interior's offices in Ramallah (the virtual capital of the Palestinian Authority) have been on partial strike which allowed the issuance of passports for "especially hard" cases. As of Monday 2 October, 2006, the employees of the Ministry have declared a full strike with no one attending their offices.

    —  No issuance of personal IDs, restricting the movement of individuals.

    —  Delay of court cases. As of today, courts' employees are going to their work place yet are not providing services. As of Saturday 7 October, 2006, it is planned that they won't go to the courts to begin with.

    —  Civil defense is on strike including the fire department.

  5. As for the Temporary International Mechanism (TIM), it had had some relieving effect especially on teachers as ever since partial payments of the salary (although not defined in the TIM as such) some of the teachers have gone back to give three lectures per day (as opposed to total strike). Yet, when talking to a number of doctors and teachers (who are supposed to be the elite of the Palestinian society due to the crucial jobs they are performing), they have expressed feelings of humiliation and degradation regarding the method used in dispersing the grant as they are forced to stay in long lines at the banks with a piece of paper identifying them and their claim number. In the past, their salaries used to go directly into their accounts and they would use an ATM Card to get it in an honorable way.

Issue 3: The challenges faced by the UN in addressing humanitarian affairs in the Palestinian territories and in service provision, and its effectiveness in meeting those challenges

  6. When talking to a number of UN employees, we have found out that the UN is finding itself in a perplexing position. On the one hand, the UN has declared that it neither has the intention nor the capacity to replace the PA and to provide services to the Palestinian people in the same capacity as the PA. On the other hand, the UN is very well aware of the detrimental consequences of the continuing deterioration of the PA and the humanitarian consequences of its inability to provide the services it is supposed to provide, which forces the UN to provide humanitarian relief in some capacity. Ideally, Israeli would recognise its responsibility as an Occupying Power towards the Palestinians and provide the needed services to keep the welfare of the occupied people as required by International Law. Yet, it is unlikely that Israel would do this, which puts both the UN and the international community in the position of having to fill that role, out of concern for the wellbeing of the Palestinians living under occupation. It could be seen that the UN and international community are subsidizing the occupation and letting Israel off the hook while the UN looks upon as part of humanitarian mandate to relieve human suffering.

  Another dimension of that dilemma is that UN employees and institutions feel that humanitarian needs must be met and that it would be best met through the already-existing mechanism of the ministries of the PA. Yet, they are faced with the fact that the UN is part of the Quartet (the UN, Russia, the EU and the United States) which have declared that in order for the assistance to flow once again, the Hamas-led PA must recognize Israel and renounce terrorism, a political position the UN has never expressed before. Such a position has a number of paralyzing effects on a number of levels in the UN and its institutions working in the Palestinian Territory.

  7. Another challenge impeding the work of the UN (and other international organizations) in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is the restrictions imposed upon its employees by Israeli authorities (especially the Israeli Defense Forces and the Israeli Border Police). During our stay in the Territory, we have found that international organizations working in the area of Hebron are confronted with hurdles aimed at impeding their access to the H2 section of the City of Hebron. National staff of these organizations are prevented from accessing, for example, the Tel Rumeida area. As for national staff of these organizations, they are required to coordinate 24 hours before accessing the afore-mentioned area which is not feasible at the case of an emergency. Such restrictions are also applied to members of the International Temporary Presence in Hebron (TIPH) whose mandate specifically indicates their ability to reach any given point in H2 without any prior coordination with the relevant Israeli authorities. Moreover, Israeli authorities have recently reduced the number of access points into H2 from four to only one. Israeli authorities justify such a reduction as necessary to coordinate the access of the affected international organizations in a more efficient manner. Yet, when speaking to TIPH and members of other affected organizations, they feel that delays at the only possible entry point have been frequent despite repeated complaints to the relevant Israeli authorities.

  8. Another obstacle facing the UN and other international organizations in the Palestinian Territory is a general atmosphere of intimidation against its employees by Israeli settlers which leads them to work in an environment of fear and worry. Such intimidation was reflected in a letter that was issued by the "Jewish Community of Hebron" and handed over to members of international organizations in which it was mentioned that "your (internationals) antagonistic attitudes and activities prevent us (members of the Jewish Community) from receiving you with open arms". Furthermore, it stated that "your behavior here in Hebron is reminiscent of thousands of years of Christian persecution for Jews for no other reason than that they are Jews" and that "foreigners, like yourselves, and our murderous Arab neighbours are the true invaders and occupiers of our land".

  Issue 4. The impact on development in the Palestinian Territories of Israel's disengagement from Gaza and the possibility of further disengagement from parts of the West Bank.

  9. The Israeli settlers in Gaza were among the most extreme and socially "difficult". We don't have much specific information on this point, except that several of our contacts in Hebron expressed concern that many of those same people have come to live in extreme settler outposts in places including Hebron, increasing tension and violence by settlers (see elsewhere). Due to the pull-out, these people typically do not recognise the legitimacy of the state of Israel so are far more prone to lawlessness.

  Issue 6. The impact of the separation barrier and other controls on the movement of goods and people on employment, poverty, economic development and on the delivery of humanitarian assistance.

  10. The ability of the Palestinian people to assert land rights in the face of either settlement expansion or separation wall construction is critical to achieving a just political solution to the conflict. Opportunistic occupation of land by Israeli settlers occurs frequently and uninhabited or uncultivated land is particularly vulnerable. Israeli law designates all land left uncultivated for more than three years as state land and the Israeli administration often cites this in order to take ownership of private land. For these reasons continuing access to land for Palestinians is essential in order to assert their rights of ownership. In addition to problems of access, many families are forced to abandon land or housing due to associated factors such as intimidation by settlers or soldiers and travel times to schools, workplaces or commercial centres.

  11. Building permits are routinely denied by the Israeli authorities to Palestinians wishing to construct on land designated as "Area C" by the Oslo agreements. Land is monitored by aerial photographs and demolition orders are placed on all buildings constructed since 1967. As a result of this housing quality is extremely poor in many villages within Area C with many people living in tents or temporary shelters. Recently constructed clinics and school buildings are facing demolition orders such as the clinic in Tuba village. Development assistance is needed to help inhabitants to improve their housing conditions, and to provide advocacy support for those facing demolition orders on buildings.

  12. In Bethlehem we were introduced to one of many people cut off from their land (and in this case his business too) by the separation barrier (in his case, a 9 metre wall). The barrier cuts deep into Palestinian territory in order to enclose Rachel's Tomb on the Israeli side of the wall, following a path through his land and along what was previously the main Jerusalem-Bethlehem road, leaving his shop on the Israeli side. He has received zero compensation. Through a translator we were able to establish that he was granted a permit to travel through a security gate in the wall to his shop, but that for the past month the border police refuse even to recognise that and insist that the gate remains locked. He wept as he told us that his livelihood had been destroyed by this action.

  13.  We had the privilege of visiting several international organisations in Hebron, including the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and the Temporary International Presence in the city of Hebron (TIPH). OCHA's published closure maps and a tour of the city demonstrate that—as mentioned before—access to the central (Israeli-controlled) H2 area of Hebron is now severely restricted. Emergency services (for Palestinians, not Israeli settlers) and international organisations now face massive problems and delays entering the area of the old city in which several settlements are situated (centred around Al Shohada Street) via one single checkpoint. TIPH informed us that even they, who according to their mandate should have special privileges, are now having difficulty gaining access to Israeli controlled areas. Taking into account the extra distance to be travelled in order to avoid the roadblocks and closures, and the potential long delays at checkpoints, there is a significant humanitarian risk posed by delays to emergency services: there is a high incidence of miscarriages and stillbirths and documented cases of deaths that would easily have been prevented with prompt medical attention which was denied to them. The already restricted number of vehicular entry points to central Hebron has been recently reduced from four to just one. The number of access points for the whole city to the by-pass roads surrounding it (Road 60, 315 and 35) has been reduced from eleven to just two, both of which pass through neighbouring towns and are unfit for the purposes of a major trading city.

  14.  In the far south of the West Bank, as well as the well-documented effects of the separation barrier, we were shown how Route 317 has separated the local Palestinian population from their lands. The enduring poverty and building restrictions also mean that the road separates parts of the population from their cisterns and water sources. We also saw how the end of the road to local hub town Yatta had been blocked by an earth mound, rendering the road useless and invisible to all but the most attentive.

  15.  Finally, the separation barrier is—according to several official reports—disrupting normal water flows from the hills, diverting about 80% of surface water, which of course has massive environmental and economic ramifications.

  Issue 7. The control that the network of settlements in the occupied territories have over the basic conditions for the development of the Palestinian economy: agricultural land, water, movement of persons and goods, environmental impacts.

  16.  The positioning of settlements we have seen often seems to be strategic with the intention of surrounding and strangulating Palestinian owned areas, particularly in East Jerusalem.

  17.  Ma'ale Adummim is a settlement in East Jerusalem which is growing fast—it now numbers 32,000 and is anticipated to reach 75,000 in five years time. The large industrial estate linked to the settlement does not provide employment for the residents of the settlement, except at management level. The workers are Palestinians, the poorest paid of whom are employed at hourly rates of 10 NIS, half Israel's minimum wage. The labour law applied by the Israelis is the Jordanian law as it stood at 1967. The Israelis plan 13 such industrial areas in the Occupied Territories. The wall in East Jerusalem has cut off Palestinian villages which had become suburbs wholly dependent on the Jerusalem economy (the East Jerusalem economy accounts for 40% of GDP in the occupied territories). People are left with the choice of living in houses on the Jerusalem side of the wall highly likely to be subject to Demolition Orders but being able to work in Jerusalem, or of living in secure housing on the other side but being unemployed. The impact on employment is massive, and leaves people no choice but to work for low wages in such industrial areas.

  18. Palestinians use of the new roads linking settlements across the West Bank is limited. Delays at checkpoints are a deterrent on 365km of roads. People working in Jerusalem leave themselves an extra two hours in the morning in case they are stopped and delayed. Some roads, 245km, are closed to Palestinians without a permit and 120km are totally closed to Palestinians (with restriction signs only in Hebrew and Arabic). A further disincentive is the high cost of Israel's road tax and insurance which is prohibitive for most Palestinians and which is required, and often requested by the IDF on Israeli roads in the Occupied Territories.

  19. One particular story is worth telling. Near the village of Nahhalin, a 100 acre farm known as "The Tent of Nations" in the ownership of the Nassar family since 1916 is surrounded on four sides by settlements: Newe Danniyel, Nahal Gevaot, Betar Illit and Rosh Zurim. The access road to the farm and to the Palestinian village of Nahhalin from Route 60 has been blocked by the IDF. In 1998-99, neighbouring settlers attempted to build a road through the property and were stopped only by an injunction obtained by the family. In 2001, settlers uprooted 250 olive trees, came onto the property and threatened the elderly mother of the family with a gun.

  20. The Nassar family has spent $150,000 (raised through international support) on asserting their legal right to the land with the case now stalled in the Supreme Court—probably because they have unassailable title, which the Israelis do not want to be affirmed by the court. Four years ago they obtained an injunction (because of the total failure of the Israeli government lawyer to prepare his case in the time given) against settlers coming onto their land. Now that it looks like the settlers will not be able to obtain the land by force, oppression, or by legal means the Nassar family have had a telephone call from settler offering them a blank cheque if they will sell the land.

  21. The farm is in Area C and as such no buildings are allowed on the land without a building permit. An Israeli surveyor (employed at a cost of $70,000 to verify title by visiting London and Turkey to research British Mandate and Ottoman records) told them he could obtain a building permit for the land at a cost of $400,000. They have no mains water or electricity. In contrast to their land, the farm land belonging to the nearby settlements is irrigated.

  22. The family is developing the site to be a resource to the nearby city of Bethlehem. They, with the help of international and local volunteers, run children's camps and are keen to develop vocational training. The building of the wall between them and Bethlehem will leave them, three Palestinian villages and other farmers surrounded by a fence with their only access to Bethlehem via a tunnel under route 60. This tunnel will be controlled by the IDF or border police and will be liable to closure at whim.

  23. Settlements are often built on land belonging to nearby Palestinian villages. As a result villages have no room to expand. In a society where families stay living in very close proximity by building new houses, this is causing disruption to family life and contributing to all the usual indicators of family breakdown.

  24. In Bethlehem an access road to Betar Illit settlement cuts a valley in two. The road is fenced and has motion sensors. It is therefore impossible for Palestinians to access the substantial olive grove in the valley for the olive harvest, or for tending the trees. It is feared that in the near future Israeli soldiers manning the checkpoint leading to the settlement and the lands in between will require Palestinians desiring to reach their lands to have permits to be granted access. In order to be granted such a permit, Palestinians must prove their ownership of the land which is a tough task (if not impossible) as lands are usually registered in the name of the great-grandfather and no official deed exists in the name of the current members of the extended families. In many other places in the West Bank we have been told that settlers harass and assault people during the olive harvest. Children are given time off school for the harvest which is gathered by the whole community. The assaults and harassment are witnessed by the many internationals that come and help with the harvest providing, in effect, a human shield.

  25. In two well documented incidents poison has been put by settlers onto nearby grazing land near Suseya.

  26.  Access to water is a key issue in the West Bank with Israel controlling an estimated 84% of water supplies. We encountered many examples where Israeli settlements have been given access to water while neighbouring Palestinian villages or hamlets are refused connection to supplies. As well as causing suffering, the lack of water is hampering efforts on the behalf of Palestinians to cultivate their land and carry out farming. This therefore contributes to the risk that land may be abandoned by owners due to the difficulties of living there, or land being left uncultivated resulting in annexation by the Israeli authorities.

  27.  Adjacent to the settlement of Karmel, located in the south of the Governorate of Hebron, there is a filling point for a water pipe. Settlers have refused access to the water tanker to replenish the tank especially in this year as drought has effectively hit the area surrounding the settlement. Not only settlers prevented water tankers from filling from the filling point (which would have reduced the costs of the drought relief effort carried out by two international organizations working in the area), they have complained to the Israeli Water Company that the drought relief effort is reducing the water pressure in the settlement. As to add insult to injury, Karmel settlers used to dump their sewage into adjacent Palestinian lands rendering it not suitable for agricultural purposes. In Hebron city, settlers at Tel Rumeida have repeatedly cut the water pipe to the homes below them with a chainsaw. As at 2 October Palestinians living beneath the settlement have been without water for 23 days. At the settlement of Susiya, south of Hebron, settlers were able to work out the arrival time for the tanker delivering drought relief water to adjacent Palestinian communities and put spikes on the road to disable the tanker. The driver of the truck spent at least two hours trying to change the tire on his truck with simple tools while feraring that the settlers would continue their aggression and attack him. Such attacks are not uncommon as masked settlers from Susiya have carried out a number of attacks on the nearby Palestinian communities including an attack on a 70-year man while he was in his tent in the last week of September 2006.

  28. We have heard of two separate ongoing situations where children have been harassed on their way to school.

    —  There is a primary school at Twani south of Hebron. Children from the nearby community of Tuba had to walk to school past the settlement of Ma'on and its associated outpost of Ma'on Farm which lies on the main short road leading to Twani. The students (ages between six and 10 years) were frequently harassed and attacked by settlers living in the outpost. In order to avoid the harassment, these young children used to take the long route to get to the school which added an additional 6 kilometers and an additional 1.5 hours to their daily trip to the school. A Christian Peacemaker Team of internationals moved to the area to accompany the children and this team were assaulted by settlers on at least three occasions. During one of the most dangerous attacks, a CPT member suffered a punctured lung and was hospitalized for three weeks, and another suffered a broken arm and hand. Given the severity of the attack and the fact that the injured were internationals, enough pressure was applied on the Israeli Ministry of Defense as to issue its orders to the IDF and the Israeli Police to provide mobile escort for the children to and from Tuba to continue their education.

    —  In Hebron girls going to the Qurduba school in the Old City were subject to abuse and stoning from settlers from the settlement of Beit Hadassa facing the school. The girls have to be accompanied to and from school by the international Ecumenical Accompaniment team working in the area due to repeated attacks by the settler children. Moreover, the TIPH has built a pathway for the students so they did not have to walk along the un-rehabilitated and unprotected road leading to the school. Settlers ripped up 26 sq m of newly laid cobbles. That was despite the fact that the location of the road is guarded by at least three military points.

  29. The settlements in and around Hebron have caused massive disruption to daily life due to the security measures the Israelis have put in place. Hebron is the major commercial city of Palestinian territories and is vital for the nation's development. As mentioned above, of the original 11 access roads to the city onto and off surrounding bypass roads, only two are now open. This has caused severe congestion on minor and inadequate roads lengthening journey times, labour and fuel costs.

  Issue 8. The role of civil society, including NGOs, in ensuring a broad popular participation in the development of Palestinian society.

  30. Palestine is awash with NGOs—local and international—but many of our contacts and associates feel that the former fail to make a proportionate positive impact. This can certainly be partly explained by the oppressive environment in which they are working. However, one can also take into account:

    —  that there is not enough emphasis upon empowerment but instead provision of aid; the result is increasing aid dependence and, as several people suggested, Israel getting "a cheap occupation" with international NGOs picking up the bill;

    —  that NGOs and civil society activity is overly concentrated in the urban areas, whereas they are arguably far more needed in the rural areas (for instance, the Tent of Nations run heavily over-subscribed educational and social programmes in Nahhalin (pop 8,000) whereas they are 400+ NGOs competing—and struggling—for participants down the road in Bethlehem);

    —  that, with the exception of Oxfam and Christian Peacemaker Teams (we were told by third party sources), international NGOs perceive themselves to be dependent upon Israel's goodwill and so are unwilling to tackle the root causes of the conflict;

    —  that there is a severe lack of co-ordination and joined-up thinking at the grass roots, so key community figures are isolated and unable to mobilise effective social movement. This can be partly put down to social structuring (for example, family and clan networks) but also very related to travel restrictions and the division of the West Bank into "cantons".

  Issue 9. The role of development assistance in supporting political solutions to the conflict.

  31. The withdrawal of aid and development assistance following the victory of Hamas in elections has caused economic conditions which are promoting unrest. There is widespread disillusionment with those in leadership and with the political process. Many people expressed their opinion that given the current leadership vacuum and lack of vision on behalf of the Palestinian Authority (as well as the Israeli Government), they felt that dissolving the PA altogether was the best way forward.

  32. Given the failure of top down political processes, the most encouraging leadership appears to be coming from active community builders and grass-roots projects. Targeted development assistance is needed to support these type of initiatives. To support this, improved infrastructure and greater opportunities for economic development are needed in order to create an environment in which radical political groups are less likely to find support, and in which political solutions can be sought.

  Recommendations

    —  For the committee to send regular delegations to Palestine, hosted by OCHA, who suggest three days would be sufficient.

  On top of that, to establish regular phone contact with key community figures such as Zoughbi Zoughbi (director of Wi'am) in order to maintain a good quality and ongoing sense of events, feelings, etc in Palestine. Those individuals are also willing to give oral evidence to the committee, although travel restrictions mean that this would probably need to be planned well in advance.

    —  (An example of a successful intervention to assist Palestinian residents to assert their land rights was a DFID project in the area south of Hebron close to the village of Tuba. The local population were mostly cave dwellers who had lived on the land for most of the last century. As the land is in the Israeli controlled Area C they have been unable to obtain building permits. The project assisted the inhabitants in the construction of cisterns to collect rainwater and of bathrooms which in particular enabled modesty and sanitary conditions for women.)

  Reinstate DFID funding for cisterns and toilet blocks in the south east of the West Bank (to the east of Suseya), withdrawn in 2005. This project was of massive value to the local Palestinian communities, enabling them to continue to live in the land in the face of settler violence, pressure from the IDF, and the refusal of ALL land development/building rights (it is Area C under the Oslo Agreement). Several people commented that DFID was for a time "the best, most progressive funder" but that that was no longer the case; they suggested that in this particular case Israeli pressure had encouraged DFID to divest. The corresponding money has since been channelled to the PA police TO LITTLE OR NO POSITIVE EFFECT. In fact, many of those toilet blocks and cisterns have either been demolished or face demolition orders: we strongly recommend that the British government resists diplomatic pressure from Israel and challenges their demolition rulings over this case.

    —  Review the issue of aid funding and explore opportunities for providing direct funding to NGO's and community organisations operating within the Palestinian territories (ie not go through the PA), and to support networking and co-operation between grass-roots movement.

Mike Love, Ed Carlisle, Steve Watters and James Clayton

October 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 31 January 2007