Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


APPENDIX 2

Martin Parkes

  I think that there are two dimensions to this problem. Firstly, the Wastewater industry is dominated by multinational companies and national governments give preferential treatment to these companies for reasons of "national interest".

  China is full of huge wastewater treatment factories funded by outside Taxpaper resources, since various national governments provided funding to Chinese Provisional governments. I've seen or heard of UK, German, Austrian and Danish examples. For a while, a significant proportion of these were switched off when the energy costs became apparent. So the consequence in the context of wastewater and sanitation is a pre-occupation with huge wastewater infrastructure which occasionally cannot be managed easily—(Zibo City). I recall in the mid 90s was looking for a joint venture partner to help run one of their plants. The obsession with huge plants is further compounded by the likelihood of greater profit for banks. See discussion notes of Rocky Mountain Institute in Colorado.

  The second issue concerns local representation in the rural areas where the water supply and sanitation concerns are most pressing. I suspect that it is often not possible to articulate demand so—on what basis have outsiders any right to interfere or dictate necessary solutions—with good intentions or otherwise? Tricky problem—good luck with finding solutions.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 26 April 2007