Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Water and Sanitation for the Urban Poor (WSUP)

THE ENQUIRY

  The White Paper pledges support for the delivery of water and sanitation services and the sustainable and equitable management of water resources. The inquiry will examine how DFID is fulfilling these commitments, as well as assessing multilateral efforts to secure progress on water and sanitation. The Committee will also look at progress by other stakeholders on water and sanitation.

RESPONSE FROM WATER AND SANITATION FOR THE URBAN POOR

  The following comments are designed to support the committee in its enquiry, with particular reference to "Financing and aid instruments for water and sanitation".

1.  BACKGROUND

  Progress towards the water and sanitation MDG's is not on track. If the goals of reducing the proportion of people without access to safe water and basic sanitation by 50% by 2015 are to be reached, the rate of progress will need to increase dramatically. There are inherent limitations to conventional approaches:

    (a)  public sector utilities are often hampered by lack of financial resources and expertise, inefficiency and in some cases lack of accountability to the poor.

    (b)  private sector solutions have in general been unsuccessful in reaching the poor communities effectively, and the majority of private companies are divesting overseas investments in water utilities.

    (c)  NGOs, while making significant advances in rural water and sanitation solutions, remain limited by lack of capital and know-how in the urban and peri-urban setting.

  So traditional approaches have not delivered fast or effectively enough for the poor.

  Looking forward, the picture looks particularly bleak for the urban poor. First, their number is increasing. 100,000 people worldwide move into a slum settlement every day. By 2030, 60% of the world's population will live in cities—up from 47% today. Secondly, finding viable water and sanitation solutions for the dense living conditions found in slums is both technically and socially challenging.

2.  WATER AND SANITATION FOR THE URBAN POOR (WSUP)

  Recognising these trends, a group of private and not-for-profit organisations founded Water and Sanitation for the Urban Poor (WSUP). WSUP is a non-profit company whose mission is to support local service providers to deliver safe water and basic sanitation to urban poor people in developing countries.

  WSUP was founded in 2004 and started operations in 2005. Its members are Halcrow Group, Unilever, Thames Water, Care International UK, WaterAid, WWF, Water for People and Cranfield University. WSUP takes a cross-sectoral approach which involves bringing together the expertise of water operating companies, engineers and NGOs in order to make a more effective contribution to the MDGs.

  WSUP is a new organisation with a project portfolio consisting of nine projects spread across Africa, Latin America and Asia. The most advanced of its projects is due to enter the implementation phase in 2007.

  WSUP aims to learn, evolve and refine its modus operandi continuously with the aim of developing a model that is effective, practical and replicable. Once WSUP has demonstrated its model, it will encourage other groups to take the same approach and hence scale up its impact.

  WSUP's working model is explained in Annex 1: "Introducing WSUP".

  The notable features of WSUP's approach are:

2.1  Project design involves community from the start

  We are convinced that any sustainable solution depends on the active participation of the community even at the earliest planning stages. If community representatives participate in the project design, then ownership is established, solutions are likely to be appropriate and workable, and an interest in the ongoing success of the solution is secured. Without this, whatever is proposed is likely to be seen as imposed from outside and at best politely ignored.

  It is the beneficiaries who have the greatest vested interest and who therefore are the key to making the solution a lasting one. Millions of pounds of high level project expertise have been wasted over the years because the community have not been involved from the beginning. WSUP supports communities to find their own solutions.

2.2  WSUP ensures the right balance between technical and social components

  This balance is key for the success of any project and is one of WSUP's key design principles. The achievement of this in practice is challenging as it relies on building trust between project partners from very different organisations. As a cross-sectoral organisation itself, WSUP works hard to ensure the balance is maintained.

2.3  WSUP aims to be involved throughout the process

  We believe that from the very first time stakeholders are brought together to plan the project, implementation has begun. It is the relationships forged between these people that will carry the project through to completion and into the future.

  At the same time, the relationships forged between local stakeholders and WSUP functional experts are vital and the project is put at risk if these relationships are not allowed to continue during implementation. For this reason, WSUP offers project implementation assistance to the service provider, to ensure the project remains on track and the design principles are upheld.

2.4  Assistance channelled through local service provider during implementation

  WSUP aims to leave behind sufficient institutional capacity to govern and manage the system into the future. In most countries, it is the local service provider which is ultimately accountable for water provision to all the city's residents, including the poor. For this reason, WSUP focuses its support during implementation on advising, assisting and building the capacity of the service provider.

3.  PROGRESS SO FAR

  WSUP is in its early days. It has five projects in scoping (Lusaka, Paraibo do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, Managua and Maputo) and three in the feasibility stages (Naivasha, Bangalore and Antananarivo). The first project will reach implementation in 2007 and, with an estimated two to three years for laying the infrastructure and commissioning the system, the first water would be delivered by 2009.

  So at this stage WSUP has no track record to demonstrate the efficacy of its approach. Until this track record has been achieved, it will, understandably, be seen as an appealing idea that still needs to be proven. Nevertheless, WSUP is attracting considerable interest and support from a wide range of sources—public, private and civil society—and we believe that circumstances are right for this initiative to make a real impact.

4.  CHALLENGES

4.1  Funding Protocols

  Multilateral agencies, along with the rest of the sector, have recognised the limitations of conventional approaches. The conclusions of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg included:

    "(we) are resolved through decisions on targets, timetables and partnerships to speedily increase access to basic requirements such as clean water, sanitation, energy, health care, food security and the protection of bio-diversity. At the same time we will assist one another to have access to financial resources... ensure capacity building, use modern technology to bring about development, and make sure there is technology transfer, human resource development, education and training to banish further underdevelopment"... and:

    "Sustainable development requires a long-term perspective and broad-based participation in policy formulation, decision-making and implementation at all levels".

  Despite these declarations, the funding requirements of multi-lateral agencies have not yet adapted to allow for new approaches.

  Funding protocol makes it difficult for non-profit organisations such as WSUP to be involved throughout the process. Without the opportunity to build relationships over time and earn the trust of local stakeholders, it is difficult to deliver the community participation that is widely recognised as being key for sustainable solutions.

  It is clearly important to tender out implementation works once the project is designed in order to ensure competitive pricing. However, the urban poor would benefit if the advisory and support services for the local service provider could be tendered out at the start of the process, enabling a single team of selected experts to provide support throughout.

4.2  Perceptions of Private Sector Involvement

  It is a constant challenge to reassure stakeholders that WSUP is not privatisation by stealth. People often assume that the WSUP partnership has an underlying agenda which is to commodify and privatise water. This of course is a total mis-conception. The reality is that the private sector WSUP members provide their expertise at cost and they are required to declare no commercial interest in the WSUP project area. The private sector are involved because a) WSUP represents a mechanism through which they can scale up their contribution to the MDGs and b) their staff are motivated by spending time on WSUP projects.

  WSUP believes that water is a right for all people and that its provision should be democratically accountable at all times. Therefore, WSUP does not advocate nor promote privatisation.

  However, some of the expertise that is needed to deliver successful project design in water and sanitation is only to be found in private companies—whether they be water operators or engineering consultants. WSUP takes a pragmatic approach—if the solution works, and if the community wants it, then it is highly appropriate that some of the expertise should be provided by private companies.

  WSUP strives to make these points clear in its communications. Nevertheless, the urban poor would greatly benefit if governments and donors would make clear statements of encouragement and support for such cross-sectoral initiatives in order to help build a wider constituency of confidence and trust.

4.3  Replication

  WSUP is committed to deliver results. WSUP acknowledges that it will need to refine its model in the light of its experience. Some aspects of the partnership approach will not work well and WSUP will need to improve its modus operandi accordingly. Given that circumstances in developing countries are varied, specific challenges to implementing successful projects will vary by country. As a WSUP member, Cranfield University is focusing on the documentation of the learnings around the WSUP partnership and these learnings will be used to refine and develop the model.

  Once WSUP has a track record and its model is proven, our aim is to disseminate our experience and encourage others to replicate it. WSUP itself estimates that it has the capacity to reach about 0.5 million people per year with water and sanitation services. This is just scratching the surface compared to the one billion that are without access. It is clear therefore that replication is necessary if we are to make a significant impact.

  The urban poor would benefit if governments and development institutions encouraged other groups to form similar partnerships in order to accelerate progress towards the MDGs.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 26 April 2007