Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Karen Women's Organisation

THE KAREN WOMEN'S ORGANISATION VIEW ON CROSS BORDER ASSISTANCE

1.  THE PARTICULAR NEEDS OF IDPS IN BURMA AND REFUGEES IN THAILAND

  a.  Life Security:  As they are hiding from the military offensive and moving from place to place to seek for safety of their lives.

  b.  Food security:  IDPs cannot carry out their normal work such as farming and plantation because they have to abandon their villages and also their crops are destroyed. There is need for food especially at the emergency time, meaning during the fighting happens in their areas and when their crops are destroyed.

  c.  Health:  There is a very high rate of maternal death and neonatal.

  d.  Education:  Particularly for girls and children- There is a need for middle school, high school and post secondary school.

2.  THE CHALLENGES FACED IN DELIVERING AID AND ASSISTANCE TO THESE GROUPS

  a.  Security:  Physical difficulties to delivery aid but it is possible.

  b.  Designing flexible implantation of programs that adaptable to the situation.

  c.  Human Resource- people can delivery aid but need more capacity building for local people to satisfy donor request like, monitoring and reporting.

  d.  Thai policy can make it difficult to get people and things to cross border.

3.  HOW DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS ARE AFFECTED BY DISPLACEMENT

  a.  Health:  Malnutrition of children and adult.

    Chronic illness (bad health).

  b.  Education:  high illiteracy people (cannot study).

    Low education level

  c.  Lost of traditional culture: difficult to maintain tradition and culture.

  d.  Increase violence Against Women

4.  THE LIKELY TRENDS IN THE REGION IN TERMS OF DISPLACEMENT, AND DEVELOPMENT AND HUMANITARIAN NEEDS

  a.  Damming at Salween River.

  b.  SPDC increase activities in the areas and persecution of ethnic people.

  c.  Increase displacement and no hope of humanitarian aid from Burma to greatly response the need.

5.  HOW DONORS CAN ASSIST IDPS IN BURMA AND REFUGEES IN THAILAND MOST EFFECTIVELY

  a.  Empower CBOs through provide fund to them.

  b.  Ensure genuine participation of refugees and IDPs members groups.

  c.  Work in partnership with local groups or CBOs.

  d.  Work with women groups when deals with women and children issues.

  e.  Consult local leadership at every stage from planning, implementing. Do not sideline the community leadership.

6.  THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CROSS-BORDER ASSISTANCE COMPARED TO OTHER WAYS OF ASSISTING IDPS IN BURMA

  Advantage:

  a.  Work with local people and CBOs. You do not need to go through the government which means you do not loose find and give money to them.

  b.  Building toward good governess and civil society.

  c.  Fund and relief items reach needy people and community.

  d.  More accountable and transparent (unless there is fighting, funders could access to the site and could monitor the project).

  e.  It is possible to give aid and more reliable compare to aid going through inside Burma.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 25 July 2007