Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40-42)

SIR SUMA CHAKRABARTI KCB, MR MARK LOWCOCK, MS NEMAT SHAFIK AND MS SUE OWEN

11 JULY 2006

  Q40  Chairman: In these fragile state areas are issues of corruption, security, fraud and so forth. In the DRC we had problems with the roads programme and I do not know whether you have managed to resolve that or where you are. We have had debate—and I raised it in the Liaison Committee—about Afghanistan and Iraq and the extent to which you have been asked to do an aid programme in a very difficult security situation, and monitoring and supervision is difficult. How are you going to keep tabs, because it is not going to help anybody if substantial aid money goes into these areas but does not reach the people?

  Sir Suma Chakrabarti: I think we are coming to the end of the session but I am glad we touched on this. This is one of the biggest concerns of the four of us: quality assurance around programmes in these very difficult places like Iraq and Afghanistan. There are a number of issues. The security one in a place like Basra. In Basra two years ago you could get things done. UK staff could get out and about, monitor, supervise and do that sort of thing. That is very difficult now, in fact virtually impossible, and it makes the quality of the programme more difficult to deliver. Afghanistan is a bit better, except if you go to Helmand and then it is the same sort of issues. Beyond that, governance, policy issues, it is very difficult to get a dialogue going if you cannot get out and see what is happening and go to the ministries and have that sort of dialogue. We have lots of second best-type of solutions, and Nemat and her team have been very creative in finding these but they are second, third and fourth best solutions and they are not the solutions we would really like to have.

  Ms Owen: It is not just about whether we can monitor where the money goes. Sometimes it is a real practical issue of how we get the money there. You are talking about cash certainly in Afghanistan and Iraq. There is very little electronic transfer of money available, so you have got immediately a risk of money simply being stolen.

  Ms Shafik: There is an issue of effectiveness. If you look at our portfolio, our worst performing projects are in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  Sir Suma Chakrabarti: Which is not surprising. All of us pay tribute to our staff who are working in those very difficult situations. The fact we have some quality programme is due to them and their courage.

  Chairman: We also appreciate there is a political reason for you being there which you might not have chosen. We have to take on board that creates difficulties.

  Q41  Ann McKechin: There is concern, particularly among the NGO community, and particularly in Afghanistan, over the link with the military operation. I can understand the principles, behind it but I think it is whether or not there is the ability to protect civilian workers working both for DFID and NGO projects which may be sponsored by DFID, and whether we are taking into account their concerns.

  Ms Shafik: By sheer coincidence I was speaking with our team in Kabul this morning. We held a meeting with all the NGOs operating in Afghanistan this week, 14 of them, to identify what their concerns are. Their major concern was they did not want to be very associated with the military operation or with the Government of Afghanistan. We have compiled a list of seven or eight key concerns they have in order to be able to operate more effectively and we are going to do the best we can to enable that.

  Q42  Chairman: Their judgment was that was a better security than being protected. I do not think we should pursue that. Thank you very much. There may be one or two questions we have not got around to which we may put to you in writing. This has been a good session and I hope it benefits you. We will produce a report on this.

  Sir Suma Chakrabarti: Thank you very much. We take this very seriously. It has been a good session for us too and gives a heads up on a number of the issues you want to pursue. We are always happy to answer your questions and we will send you written answers to the questions you asked.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 30 November 2006