Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


5—Memorandum submitted by the Tropical Health and Education Trust (THET)

  1.  THET (founded in 1988) is the umbrella body for long-term Links between NHS institutions and medical, nursing and other health professional training schools in the UK and their counterparts in developing countries globally—fruitful partnerships for development as championed as a Millennium Development Goal. It also mounts demonstration projects with African partners to model accessible health care in Ethiopia, Somaliland, Ghana, Uganda and Malawi, typically addressing the needs of people with chronic conditions (such as epilepsy, mental illness, diabetes and chronic heart and lung conditions) in more remote rural areas. In all of THET's work the training and continuing medical education of health workers, to create long term capacity, is key. The overall aim is to strengthen basic, sustainable health care services for the general population.

  2.   Coherence with other Government Departments. NHS Links bring threefold benefits: to the developing country via building of healthcare capacity; to the NHS or UK teaching staff involved, because of the insights, skills and personal development that result; and to development awareness in the UK, because they create an important constituency of involved people and their supporters within NHS institutions or medical schools, committed to the cause of international development.

  3.  These three interrelated dimensions inevitably pose a challenge to separate Government Departments and compartments. Possibly for this reason, DFID has perhaps been a little slow to grasp the potential of Links as a means of harnessing the immense resources of the NHS and UK health professions to international development efforts. The efforts to collaborate with the Department of Health (DoH) are recent and as yet less steady than the collaboration with DFES over school links and development awareness. Most individual Links get no DFID support either for direct international development contributions or development awareness. There are, however, good signs for the future: there have been high level meetings between DFID and DoH about better support for health links; DFID has recently awarded a grant of some £500,000 over three years from the Civil Society Challenge Fund to THET to support its Links work; and DoH has in parallel seconded a senior manager to THET to assist our promotional work among NHS institutions. We sense an openness to further change for the better, eg a more strategic and systematic approach to funding Links work at different levels, and recognising in concrete ways the contribution of such Links to development awareness as well as international development goals. These good possible trends need reinforcement.

  4.  There is a particularly significant strategic opportunity now, because Sir Nigel Crisp has been asked by the Prime Minister to report to him and the Secretaries of State for International Development and Health by the end of the year on how the UK can give greater assistance to strengthening the health systems of developing countries. This should open up ideas for further collaboration across Departmental boundaries, clearer recognition of the potential of Links at different levels for the threefold benefits already identified, a more strategic and determined approach to foster and support them, and integrate them in sector wide approaches to supporting the healthcare systems of developing countries. It would be very helpful if the Committee were to shine a light on this area and lend impetus to the efforts being made by DFID, DoH and Sir Nigel and his team, and NGOs like THET, to make the most of this opportunity.

  5.   Increasing Aid Volumes. It follows that one important area for increased assistance should be the encouragement of Links activity in health both for its direct impact on international development goals and its role in the international development awareness and commitment of the health workforce and medical and nurse training student bodies in the UK. More generally, THET can testify to the great importance of long term support by international donors such as DFID for human resource planning for health, as advocated so persuasively by the WHO. Promoting the supply and continuing training of health workers in developing countries cannot be properly undertaken in three year or even five year fits and starts. Health Ministries need reliable and long term commitments (even though they cannot be completely unconditional), linked to strategic plans to meet heathcare needs as a whole. In THET's view, this is a more promising approach than investing in vertical programmes defined by particular diseases such as HIV/AIDS. All too often the latter inadvertently undermine the basic health services of the country by setting up separate UN or NGO systems, paying higher salaries than the health services and sucking vital health workers out of the basic health care systems where they are desperately needed. THET commends the efforts by DFID to strike a new balance in favour of more support for health systems and human resource plans "owned" by the developing countries' own authorities. Links should be integrated in these plans and co-ordinated by indigenous Ministries of Health. Such donor support, if related to the needs highlighted by the WHO and sustained for the long term as it needs to be, could absorb fruitfully a substantial part of the increased aid volumes. We hope the Committee will agree and encourage this direction.

  6.   The organisation of the Department. The international development universe is now very complex globally, and traditionally DFID has helped UK-based NGOs to navigate it. This ability to help UK NGOs make the most of their contribution could be affected by three organisational developments. One, DFID is so decentralised that we are sometimes told, in effect: "for an answer to that you really need to speak to DFID's representatives in half a dozen or more separate country offices". This can be unrealistic for smaller NGOs. Two, the consultancies to which important DFID functions have been outsourced are no substitute for expertise in house which can more readily be integrated with policy and strategic considerations and brought to bear in a manageable set of relationships with DFID officials. Three, if DFID in the interests of aid harmonisation surrenders its own active presence in Ghana or Tanzania to other countries, it is important that NGOs which may find it difficult enough to maintain good relationships with a range of DFID officials, let alone those of the Netherlands etc too, are helped to achieve good access to the officials of such other countries. Otherwise, what may seem sensible or neat from the point of view of rationalising DFID's efforts may end up making it more difficult for the NGOs and other players in the UK to make their contribution in countries where the UK has had specially strong traditions. The Committee could helpfully explore these issues.

  7.   Aid Modalities. There is no one means of support which is uniquely right for every circumstance. THET supports the direction of current policy in favour of more support through budgets or sector wide approaches to systems of health and to strategic plans for balanced health care services, including crucially human resources. We recognise that such schemes of "horizontal" support cannot be unconditional; there must be conditions relating to the transparent use of the funds for agreed objectives, to progress made and to certain values which are non-negotiable if UK public support for international development aid is to be sustained. The potential clash of imperatives creates arduous dilemmas for DFID Ministers which are appreciated here, and which should not discourage them from persevering with the best long term approach as circumstances allow, and finding second best ways of continuing to achieve the most important strategic objectives where necessary.

  8.  In particular, we would emphasise the importance of long term support for human resource plans owned by the developing country's Ministry and health authorities. Without it, all kinds of promising projects cannot be replicated and excellent efforts, including NHS Links, cannot reach their potential and may not be sustainable.

  9.  This involves making sure that the indigenous health authorities have the capacity to assert and keep control, keep the multitude of development agencies and NGOs in their place and achieve a reasonable balance of power in the relationship. For this reason, DFID's grant to THET for promoting NHS Links includes provision at our request to support pilot Links Co-ordinator posts in four developing countries, so that the promotion and co-ordination is not all at the UK end, and so that Links with other developed countries can be taken into account.

  10.  Nevertheless, within this broad framework we must beware a simplistic and "one-eyed" approach, with the pendulum swinging from one extreme position to the other. The case for some conditions has been acknowledged above. The Committee will also be well aware of the importance of assisting civil society in developing countries to thrive and exert influence, not least by providing a voice to groups who would otherwise tend to be unheard, and to hold the authorities to account. Moreover, even with capacity-building support, Ministries of Health and other indigenous health authorities will remain under great constraints and almost overwhelming pressures. In order to develop plans for health care in different dimensions, they will often need ideas, experience, resources and skills from outside, and continuing support and engagement from those who have won trust as faithful partners genuinely working to the priorities of the developing country partner and not imposing their own. It would be unrealistic to conceive of writing a cheque and leaving them to get on with it unassisted. As enshrined in the Millennium Development Goals, proven global partnerships for development are to be celebrated and supported, and should not fall foul of a narrowly interpreted ideology of budget support.

  11.  These are the issues on which THET feels it has the experience to testify to the Committee. We are glad that the Committee is undertaking this Inquiry and should be glad to elaborate on this evidence in any way that would be helpful.

June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 30 November 2006