Select Committee on International Development Ninth Report


Recommendations


1.  We agree that the International Criminal Court warrants have helped to bring the parties to the negotiating table, and have engendered a greater level of international awareness of the conflict. We believe that this is a positive step. The way in which the warrants are dealt with, at the end of the peace process, will have implications for the future credibility of the ICC. We see the capacity of the Court to defer to national processes which meet international justice standards as part of its strength and not as something which should be seen as damaging the credibility of the Court. However the ICC is on a sharp learning curve and must be given the necessary support by the international community to carry out its mandate according to international law. In this way the ICC, and its potential contribution to the Responsibility to Protect, will be strengthened. (Paragraph 10)

2.  We are pleased that the Juba peace process is continuing and has made progress, despite setbacks. The international community must continue to support this fragile process through the Juba Initiative Fund and by encouraging all parties to remain committed to a non-military solution. (Paragraph 13)

3.  Justice and accountability are crucial elements for any lasting peace. The victims of the conflict, and especially women and children, must be included in discussions about accountability and in any traditional justice mechanisms adopted. The UK Government, along with other donors, can help to ensure that a wide consultation takes place on these matters so that grievances are fully dealt with at an early stage. The Ugandan legal system must demonstrate the capacity to process and fairly adjudicate on allegations of gross human rights violations arising from the conflict. We recommend that the UK Government raise concerns about the independence and accessibility of the Ugandan judiciary with the Government of Uganda. (Paragraph 17)

4.  We would support a decision by DFID to assist in the reintegration of more combatants into their communities through additional funding for the Amnesty Commission. (Paragraph 18)

5.  Despite the cessation of hostilities brought about by the Juba peace process, northern Uganda still faces a humanitarian crisis. Donors must undertake to continue to provide humanitarian assistance, at the level outlined by the UN Consolidated Humanitarian Appeal, as long as is necessary to ensure that conditions in the IDP camps do not deteriorate again. (Paragraph 21)

6.  Fears about the security situation outside the camps must be taken seriously. Measures to increase and improve the police presence in the camps and in rural areas are a step in the right direction. We believe that funding for police training should become a priority for donors in northern Uganda and that an appropriate exit strategy for the Uganda People's Defence Force should be developed as the civilian police presence increases. (Paragraph 23)

7.  We note that the UN Consolidated Humanitarian Appeal includes the Karamoja region and share the concerns raised by NGOs about security there. We urge donors to adopt a comprehensive approach to peacebuilding in the region and not to exclude security in the Karamoja region from their discussions with the Government of Uganda. (Paragraph 24)

8.  The protection of conflict-affected children is an area of great concern and we consider that the welfare of children, including psycho-social needs, should be treated as a priority. We recommend that the needs of children affected by the conflict become a focus of DFID's post-conflict programmes. We expect to be kept informed about progress on the social protection and cash transfer schemes which DFID is considering. (Paragraph 25)

9.  The international donor community must work alongside the Government of Uganda to ensure that sufficient resources continue to be directed at the north and that the priorities for re-development are those identified by people in the north, including women and civil society groups. We recommend that a greater level of consultation should be a condition of DFID's and other donors' contributions to the Peace, Recovery and Development Plan. (Paragraph 26)

10.  The UN Development Programme and the Government of Uganda should work together to ensure that an Early Recovery Cluster is established as soon as possible. All too frequently when conflicts end there is a time lag before development projects get underway with severe consequences for sustaining the peace. We recommend that DFID takes all possible steps to ensure this does not happen in Uganda. (Paragraph 27)


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 24 July 2007