1 Serving healthy and appetising meals
1.The public sector in England spends around £2
billion annually on food and catering. The four largest areas
of expenditure are schools, hospitals, Armed Forces basesand
prisons which the Committee examined separately in June 2006 (Figure
1).[3] Public food
procurement encompasses not only the immediate purchasing of food
but also how public bodies receive, store, prepare and serve it.
| Figure 1: The four main areas of public sector expenditure on food and catering
|
| Sector
Schools
NHS Trusts
Armed Forces
Prison Service
| Annual expenditure
£1 billion on food and catering
£500 million (of which £300 million is on food)
£135 million on food
£94 million (of which £43 million is on food)
|
Source: National Audit Office
2. The quality, safety and value for money of food
are of prime interest to the millions of adults and children who
consume it (Figure 2). Healthy food also has an important
role to play in the long term health of school children, including
the need to reduce levels of childhood obesity[4],
and can be an important factor in helping NHS patients to recover,
and for maintaining the morale and operational effectiveness of
the armed forces.
| Figure 2: Key statistics on public food
|
- 617 million school meals are served each year (at an average daily cost of £1.50 of which between 37 and 85 pence is spent on ingredients)
- 300 million meals are served in the NHS each year (at an average daily cost for three meals of £2.60)
- 117 million meals were served by the MoD in 2004-05 (at an average daily cost for three meals of £2.10)
- 69 million meals are served each year to the inmates of public sector prisons (at an average daily cost for three meals of £1.87)
|
3. The quality of school food has received increased
public and media attention in recent years with concern, in particular,
about the unhealthy nature of many of the meals provided. The
Department for Education and Skills has established new food-based
standards that specify the types of food to be served for school
lunches. For example, the standards include an outright ban on
confectionery and savoury snacks, high in salt and fat, restrictions
on deep fried food and manufactured meat products, and stipulation
about the number of times that healthier food such as fruit, fresh
vegetables and oily fish should be available over a given period.
The standards became mandatory from September 2006, and will be
extended to cover all food provided in schools (for example in
vending machines and breakfast clubs) in September 2007. Additional
nutrient-based standards will become mandatory for primary schools
in September 2008 and secondary schools in September 2009.[5]
4. To support the drive for improved school food
the Department for Education and Skills committed £220 million
of transitional funding over three years (from September 2005
to October 2007) to all local authorities and schools, along with
guidance on the types of items and activities the funding might
be used to support.[6]
The Department set minimum thresholds for expenditure on school
meal ingredients of 50p for primary schools and 60p for secondary
schools.[7] The Department's
latest information on performance shows that spending in primary
and secondary schools currently runs at 52p and 67p respectively.[8]
Distribution of funding is on the simple basis of total numbers
of pupils in each area and the numbers of those eligible for free
school lunches.[9]
5. The Department for Education and Skills has only
limited arrangements to assess how well this transitional money
is being used by schools and local authorities to raise standards.[10]
The Department recognises that balancing the need to secure value
from the additional funding with a policy commitment to greater
autonomy at the local level represents a significant challenge.[11]
For example, schools and local authorities are able to exert discretion
over how they procure food and catering, what they provide and
what they charge parents.[12]
6. In September 2006, the Department announced an
additional £240 million of transitional funding to further
subsidise the costs of healthier ingredients in school lunches
over the three years from 2008-09.[13]
One of the aims of this funding is to help schools and local authorities
keep down the prices charged for school meals, helping to maintain
or increase levels of take-up.[14]
The funding will be skewed towards the areas of greatest social
need, although the department has not yet finally decided what
criteria will be used to that end.[15]
7. The School Food Trust was
established in May 2006 and became operational in September 2006.
It has a £15 million core budget for three years to work
with 7.6 million pupils (and their parents) to implement the Department
for Education and Skills new food and nutritional standards in
all in 21,000 schools in England, and promote the education and
health of children by improving the quality of food consumed and
supplied in schools.[16]
The Trust has four published goals including one to ensure
that all schools meet the food and nutritional standards for school
food by September 2009. The Trust has 11 published targets including
one to produce guidance for school staff, parents and children
on the new Nutritional Standards for school food, and another
to increase demand for school lunches by 4% by March 2008 and
10% by autumn 2009.[17]Since
September 2005 the remit of Ofsted has been extended to cover
the inspection of the quality of school meals services.
8. In March 2005 the Department announced that the
School Food Trust would receive funding of £60 million, comprised
of the £15 million of Departmental core funding plus a further
£45 million from the Big Lottery Fund.[18]
A further announcement from the Department in May 2005 stated
that the Big Lottery Fund had decided to allocate up to £45
million to support healthy eating projects and initiatives for
children, parents and their wider communities.[19]
Organisations, including the Trust, were invited to bid for this
funding. The Fund advised in December 2006 that the Trust had
qualified for the second (and final) stage of the bid evaluation
process in which they could bid for up to £20 million.[20]
A final decision will be made in the summer of 2007.
9. The average level of school meal take up is 45%,
and as low as 26% in some local authorities, putting the financial
viability of school meals services at risk, and potentially reducing
the number of children who eat at least one healthy meal per day.[21]
One school, however, has been able to treble take up (from 30
to 90%), and quadruple revenue for reinvestment.[22]
The Department for Education and Skills recognises that it needs
to address low levels of take up by working closely with local
authorities and schools in the worst performing areas to develop
strategies to persuade children and their parents of the benefits
of healthy eating and provide appetising and healthy meals. It
also needs to tackle barriers to take up such as unattractive
dining environments, restrictive opening hours and the potential
stigma associated with free school meals.[23]
10. The Better Hospital Food Programme (established
in 2001) was, until its closure in April 2006, the main Department
of Health programme for improving the quality of meals served
in hospitals. The Department planned to replace this with a new
initiative, the "Eating Well in Hospital" programme,
but has decided instead to distribute funding for improving hospital
food direct to NHS trusts which it considers are better placed
to decide how this funding should be spent. The Patient Environment
Action Team (under the management of the National Patient Safety
Agency) is responsible for assessing the quality of the meals
provided. In 2005, 84% of hospitals were rated 'excellent' or
'good', compared to 58% in 2004.[24]
11. Alongside the drive for improved quality in public
food and catering, whether health, education or the armed services,
there is the need to encourage customers to eat better food as
part of adopting a healthier lifestyle.[25]
There are a range of good practices in marketing and education,
as well as practical steps that can be used to influence eating
habits, such as working closely with contract caterers to introduce
healthier food combined with promotional and educational events
that encourage healthy eating.[26]
Departments recognise that they have to address the needs of all
customers in their standards, guidance and promotional work on
healthy eating, including those with special dietary requirements
or taste preferences such as the elderly or ethnic and minority
communities, and to raise awareness amongst food procurers, catering
staff and contractors about what is expected of them.[27]
Regular canvassing of customer feedback is needed as part of regular
meal service quality audits (as used by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust).[28]
3 Committee of Public Accounts Fifty-sixth Report of
Session 2005-06, Serving time: prisoner diet and exercise,
HC 1063 Back
4
Committee of Public Accounts, Eighth Report of Session 2006-07,
Tackling Child Obesity-First Steps, HC 157 Back
5
Ev 18 Back
6
C&AG's Report, Smarter Food Procurement in the Public Sector;
Case Studies, HC (Session 2005-2006), 963-II, Para 4, page 4 and
Figure 4, page 6; Letter from the Department for Education and
Skills to all Directors of Children's services/Directors of Education
in Local Authorities in England (8 August 2005) Back
7
Q 7 Back
8
ibid Back
9
ibid Back
10
Qq 5, 7, 64; C&AG's Report, Smarter food procurement in
the public sector: Case Studies, HC (Session 2005-06),
963-II, Figure 4, page 6 Back
11
Q 55 Back
12
Qq 66, 67 Back
13
Q 70; Ev 17 Back
14
Q 68 Back
15
Qq 70, 71 Back
16
Qq 39, 40, 81, 82; Ev 18 Back
17
The School Food Trust Strategic Plan 2006-2009 Back
18
ibid Back
19
DfES Press Notice 2005/0052 (16 May 2005); C&AG's Report,
Smarter Food Procurement in the Public Sector: Case Studies,
HC (2005-06) 963-II, second bullet, para 4, page 5 Back
20
Available at www.biglotteryfund.org.uk Back
21
C&AG's Report, Smarter Food Procurement in the Public Sector,
HC (2005-06) 963-I, para 2.13, page 37 Back
22
Q 10; C&AG's Report, Smarter Food Procurement in the Public
Sector: Case Studies, HC (2005-06) 963-II, Case Example E,
page 13 Back
23
Qq 10, 69 Back
24
C&AG's Report, Smarter Food Procurement in the Public Sector:
Case Studies, HC (2005-06) 963-II, Figure 10, page 20 Back
25
Q 118 Back
26
C&AG's Report, Smarter Food Procurement in the Public Sector,
HC (2005-06) 963-I, para 2.28, page 42 Back
27
Qq 43, 44 Back
28
C&AG's Report, Smarter Food Procurement in the Public Sector:
A good practice guide, HC (2005-06) 963-III, para 34, page
16 Back
|