SUPPORT TO PRIMARY CARE TRUSTS
4. The Department provided a range of guidance for
Primary Care Trusts before the handover of the service. For example,
new guidance was published in 2003, an Exemplar Programme was
created to pilot new ways of working, 11 regional centres were
established to spread good practice, and a template to aid performance
monitoring and reporting was distributed around providers. Despite
the range of guidance provided, however, many Primary Care Trusts
encountered difficulties in establishing new services because
of time constraints and a lack of information to inform the planning
of services. Many providers had difficulties in using the template
designed to aid performance monitoring and reporting, and only
25 Primary Care Trusts actually used it. In light of this experience,
the Department decided to re-examine common reporting processes.
Although variable outcomes are likely in a system with 300 Primary
Care Trusts, the Department accepted that it should have provided
more practical support to all Primary Care Trusts.[8]
5. A key difficulty for Primary Care Trusts in their
preparation for the handover was ongoing confusion over whether
the new service should provide 'unscheduled' care to treat all
patients that required attention, or restrict access to 'urgent'
cases and ask all others to see a GP in-hours the next day. The
Department wanted the public to be able to choose which service
they want to use, and its aim during the handover was not to restrict
access for patients but to advise them on how they could receive
the most appropriate care or advice. It had not defined whether
out-of-hours should be urgent or unscheduled, either at the time
of the handover or in the contract negotiations, but has since
recognised that it needed to do so.[9]
THE SHAPE OF THE NEW SERVICE
6. The handover resulted in the service being delivered
by a range of providers from both private and public sectors.
The Department was keen to encourage plurality of provision; it
saw an important ongoing role for the voluntary, private and independent
sectors as well as the NHS, and wanted everyone so far as possible
to be able to participate. The Department was also keen to encourage
greater movement towards the integration of all unscheduled and
urgent care services, including Accident & Emergency, out-of-hours
services, district nursing and ambulance services.[10]
7. Primary Care Trusts were not required to run competitive
tenders, and only 39% did so. The price of the service being paid
by Primary Care Trusts that tendered was only 29 pence per head
of population lower than that paid by those who did not tender,
and quality standards did not vary at all. In many instances the
specifications had been written by providers, however, and there
was a favouring of local co-operatives. The Department's view
was that more competition was needed.[11]
8. Out-of-hours providers have increasingly used
nurses and other health professionals to work with GPs in out-of-hours
services. The increased use of nurses has been seen as a way of
making services more cost-effective. Whilst GPs remain essential,
nurses can handle many aspects of out-of-hours care.[12]
3 C&AG's Report, para 1.1 Back
4
Mutual organisations are GP co-operatives organised on a community
ownership model-C&AG's Report, para 5.1 and Figure 12 Back
5
C&AG's Report, para 1.6 and Appendix 5 Back
6
C&AG's Report, para 3.19 Back
7
C&AG's Report, paras 1.2, 1.3, 1.8, 5.6 Back
8
C&AG's Report, paras 2.2, 2.7, 3.28; Qq 97-9 Back
9
C&AG's Report, para 2.3-2.5; Qq 16-17, 22-24 Back
10
C&AG's Report, paras 1.6, 5.1; Figure 12, 13; Qq 124, 185-187 Back
11
C&AG's Report, paras 2.15, 2.16; Qq 182-184 Back
12
Q 190 Back