Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

16 MAY 2007

HM REVENUE AND CUSTOMS

  Q60  Mr Wright: And you think that is compatible with efficiency savings and the tens of thousands of job losses that HMRC have carried out and will be carrying out in future years to meet the 5% real savings year on year?

  Mr Gray: It is not only consistent it is actually a rather important enabler.

  Q61  Mr Wright: But that loss of collective memory on a regional basis is surely an important factor?

  Mr Gray: The direction in which we are going is seeking to make sure that our memory and intelligence from whatever source is captured and codified in our systems. That is going to be a lot more effective than it just resting in individuals' heads. We are obviously seeking to make sure, as numbers in the organisation do decline, that we do all we possibly can to capture and retain that memory and then systematise it better.

  Q62  Mr Wright: May I draw your attention to page 7 (i) "Getting tax returns in on time"? The NAO seems to have made a perfectly reasonable recommendation about identifying the risk factors by sector. In the Report it seems to happen with regards to VAT; paragraph 1.7 seems to say there are certain traits of relatively poor filing performance, but that is not the case with company tax. Have you hazarded a guess as to which sectors are poor in terms of corporation tax?

  Mr Gray: What the Report was saying in relation to both taxes is that we ought to be developing and improving our risk assessment not just by sector but by a range of other characteristics. What emerges from the work we have done so far, but we are putting more effort into that, is that particular sectors often are not a primary driver of relative risk. We are obviously always on the look-out to see whether there are particular sectors, and what we are looking at in particular now is whether there is a correlation between lateness and particular sectors and a correlation in which lateness in one sector seems to be a major cause of non-compliance. The results so far suggest that is not the case in most sectors.

  Q63  Mr Wright: Is there any correlation between regions, say the North West might be slow at paying compared with the South East? Do any enhancements take place with regard to that?

  Mr Gray: I am not sure we do give a lot of weight to that.

  Q64  Mr Wright: Does any analysis take place with regards to that?

  Mr Lloyd: The key correlation we are finding is between the size of the business and, as the Report says in paragraph 1.10, the sectoral cut and looking at large business we are seeing very much a reduced level of risk.

  Q65  Mr Wright: But would you know whether it was a regional basis or not? On page 7 it says: "The Department did not, in 2005-06, monitor whether individual Area Officers met targets for processing returns promptly and accurately". I would have thought that would have been a key performance indicator, but that does not seem to be the case.

  Mr Gray: I would accept that that is a past deficiency that we ought to be putting right; we talked earlier about deficiencies in management information. What we are now looking to do though is potentially streamline significantly the way in which we do the processing. As the Report brings out, there is a very sharp difference at the moment between the way in which filing is done for VAT, where it is all done in a single centre in Southend in the former Customs site and corporation tax, where it was traditionally done in a large number of network offices around the country and was not done as a specialist task. It was often done alongside compliance work and other things and we are now definitely looking to put in place the more rigorous information you are talking about and there is a presumption over time that we will probably move to more specialised, more centralised areas in order to improve that very control point.

  Q66  Mr Wright: Page 10, figure 2. There has been a virtual doubling of assessments in terms of VAT returns outstanding at mid-October 2006 not replaced by a late return. I may have misunderstood that but that is quite disturbing. Is there a significant loss to the Revenue because of that? Table 2, between 2004-05 83,000 assessments and 2005-06 150,000 assessments which were not replaced by a late return. Is that a disturbing trend or have I just misunderstood that?

  Mr Lloyd: The simple answer to that is because we are talking about an earlier period where they have had longer to be replaced by a return. Less time has elapsed since the figure of 150,000 for 2005-06 for a return to be issued and for it to be replaced.

  Q67  Mr Khan: You mentioned earlier on your issues of priority and in answer to a question you explained that a certain issue was not an issue of priority. How much of a priority is customer service to you?

  Mr Gray: A very high priority.

  Q68  Mr Khan: The biggest demand businesses have is a single point of contact. How are you meeting that request?

  Mr Gray: Over the course of the next two to three years that is a very big priority for us as an organisation. Again, it was something that was discussed in the hearing a few weeks ago.

  Q69  Mr Khan: How soon before a business has a single point of contact? It is 2007 now.

  Mr Gray: It is likely to be 2010 or 2011.

  Q70  Mr Khan: So another four years before their desire to have a single point of contact has meant that customer service is your highest priority. How high a priority is reducing cost for businesses?

  Mr Gray: Again, that is a very significant priority.

  Q71  Mr Khan: As high as customer service or below customer service?

  Mr Gray: Broadly balanced between the two. I have explicit targets for both and I am seeking to meet both in parallel.

  Q72  Mr Khan: 30% of the total burden of dealing with VAT is the administrative burden of preparing and filing VAT returns. The Chancellor of the Exchequer has imposed a target upon you of reducing that by 10% over five years from 2006. You are going to meet that target presumably.

  Mr Gray: I very much hope I am going to exceed it.

  Q73  Mr Khan: 50% of the total burden of dealing with corporation tax is the administrative burden of filing and preparing corporation tax returns. How much are you going to reduce that by?

  Mr Gray: That is covered by the same target of 10% because that 10% target was not specific to a particular tax regime.

  Q74  Mr Khan: We know the Chancellor of the Exchequer has assisted you in that goal by imposing this target upon you. The NAO have also tried to help you and have given you some ideas on how you can reduce the cost to business. Idea number one is to remove the requirement to file returns from those businesses with no tax liability. The Chairman referred to this in his opening questions and your answer was no.

  Mr Gray: My answer was that that was a proposition that we put forward that we are perfectly happy, indeed keen, to pursue and in response to reaction from our customers we concluded that if they do not want it, we will not force it on them.

  Q75  Mr Khan: Mr Gray, you have used 42 words to say no. You are not going to go ahead with that recommendation are you?

  Mr Gray: At this stage, no.

  Q76  Mr Khan: Right. The second thing the NAO recommended is to simplify the tax systems and returns; paragraph 3.5 of their Report alludes to this. What is your response to that recommendation to try to reduce the cost to businesses?

  Mr Gray: We are very keen to respond to that and are looking to see how we can best meet that.

  Q77  Mr Khan: The third recommendation they make in broad terms is that you could align the dates for payment of corporation tax, the filing of accounts to Companies House and the filing of the company tax return, which would reduce the cost to business. What is your response to that recommendation?

  Mr Lloyd: We are looking to allow joint filing for Companies House and for HMRC in parallel with the mandation of CT online in 2011.

  Q78  Mr Khan: Also 2011. The other recommendation they make is to introduce better interventions rather than costly inspection inquiries to help businesses comply. What is your response to that one?

  Mr Gray: Yes.

  Q79  Mr Khan: Yes; you agree with that. Also 2011?

  Mr Gray: I hope we can do that more quickly than that and progressively roll that out over time.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 4 December 2007