Select Committee on Public Accounts Sixty-Sixth Report


Conclusions and recommendations


1.  BBC guidance gives both the Executive Board and the Audit Committee detailed responsibilities for risk management but they are not clearly delineated. The BBC Trust, which is responsible for seeing that the Executive Board addresses the key operating risks for the BBC, should make it clear that the Executive Board is responsible for the day-to-day management of risk.

2.  The main themes used by the BBC for risk management are not aligned with its corporate objectives, and the Executive Board is receiving information on almost 300 risks. The BBC should align its risk management arrangements with the strategic priorities to be set by the Trust, and rationalise the information presented to the Executive Board so that its attention is focused on the most important risks.

3.  The abduction of the BBC journalist Alan Johnston while working in Gaza illustrates the risks to which BBC employees can be exposed. The BBC should update its assessments of the risks of working in hostile environments. The BBC should also satisfy itself that freelancers, as well as its employees, are adequately trained for work which could involve risks to their health and safety.

4.  The way the BBC ran a live phone-in competition on Blue Peter led to Ofcom fining the BBC for failing to comply with its Broadcasting Code. The BBC subsequently identified other instances of phone-in and interactive competitions where the public had been misled. The independent review which the BBC Trust intends to commission in 2008 will need to identify the reasons for programme makers ignoring the BBC's own editorial guidelines and exposing it to significant reputational risks.

5.  The BBC has not related its risks to corporate objectives or assigned all risks to named owners, as recommended in Treasury guidance. We have commented before, in our report on the BBC's White City 2 Development, that the BBC would benefit from drawing on such guidance.[2]

6.  BBC managers at all levels are not sufficiently engaged in the management of risk:

¯  senior management are not promoting risk management effectively;

¯  individual risk managers are dissatisfied with the training provided and do not bother to use the available guidance; and

¯  good risk management practices are not embedded throughout the BBC's projects and business processes.

The BBC should develop a timetabled strategy for increasing and measuring understanding of its risk management policies and procedures, and require positive confirmation annually that individual managers understand their responsibilities. It is helpful that the BBC intends to re-run the National Audit Office survey of risk management to assess progress.

7.  The BBC Trust, not the Comptroller and Auditor General, decides the programme and the scope of individual value for money reviews of the BBC. The Comptroller and Auditor General should have the same rights of access to the BBC as to other publicly funded bodies. He would then be able to decide what to examine and when, on the basis of a full and independent assessment of value for money risks, and report to Parliament independently of the BBC. There is no evidence to suggest that such arrangements would do anything other than strengthen Parliamentary scrutiny of the BBC and the oversight role of the BBC Trust.


2   Committee of Public Accounts, Twenty-fourth Report of Session 2005-06, The BBC's White City 2 development, HC 652 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 6 December 2007