3 Skills and expertise in public sector
teams
17. Although most PFI contracts are procured and
managed by local authorities and NHS trusts or other locally-based
teams, many of these projects are supported by central government
funding. Major Departments have established Private Finance Units
with a remit to support the development, tendering and on-going
management of projects in their sectors. In its policy document,
Strengthening Long Term Partnerships (2006), the Treasury recognised
that many Private Finance Units were inadequate and needed strengthening.
18. Apart from Private Finance Units, there are a
number of other organisations with a remit to improve PFI procurement
and operations. The Treasury takes the lead on policy development
and chairs a Project Review Group that examines PFI projects before
central government funding is provided. The Office of Government
Commerce has a general remit to improve procurement across government,
including complex procurement, co-ordinates the Government Procurement
Service, and carries out Gateway Reviews at various stages in
project procurement. Other organisations with a remit to improve
PFI procurement and contract management include Partnerships UK
and, within the local authority sector, the Public Private Partnerships
Programme.[20]
19. Nevertheless, there is a continuing lack of PFI
skills and expertise across the public sector, particularly in
local authorities, NHS trusts, and other locally-based teams where
officials are usually encountering PFI negotiations for the first
time. The Treasury accepted that this was a major issue, and had
sought to provide support through an Operational Task Force run
by PUK, providing skilled secondees to local authorities, and
the development of centralised programme management through bodies
such as Partnerships for Schools and Partnerships for Health.[21]
20. While it did not have the remit to carry out
any capability assessments of local authorities, the Treasury
considered that the best authorities were those which had undertaken
more than one procurement. Leeds City Council was cited as an
example. Although its first PFI deal ran into a number of problems
during the procurement, its last four deals were all tendered
within 18 months with adviser costs within budget. The Director
of the Council's Public Private Partnerships unit considered that
the build up of expertise had enabled it to develop a better understanding
of when and how to use external advisers, how to put together
a project specification, and a greater commercial awareness leading
to more focused negotiations with the private sector.[22]
21. This experience is not typical, however, and
one-third of procuring authorities admit that they have insufficient
resources or in-house expertise for part or all of the tendering
process. A barrier to the development of this expertise is the
fact that experience is not shared as widely as it could be because
there is no systematic way of ensuring that lessons are shared
within and across sectors. Greater recycling of experience across
the public sector could also lead to savings in the cost of advisers,
which were on average 75% higher than budgeted on PFI projects
which had closed between April 2004 and May 2006.[23]
22. Good negotiating skills are essential if public
sector officials are to secure good deals from private sector
counterparts who are usually experienced in developing and managing
PFI projects. For example, project teams which had undertaken
the initial benchmarkings and market testings had identified the
need for negotiation skills to challenge price increases proposed
by the contractors, which were up to 26% in addition to the annual
price increases for inflation allowed by the contracts. The Head
of PFI policy at the Treasury, who had until recently been employed
as a private sector adviser to public authorities, told us that
the quality of individual public sector project teams was mixed.
There had, however, been improvements in recent years and the
Ministry of Defence's Private Finance Unit was an example of this
improvement. Public sector procurements could also be improved
through the greater transfer of existing PFI procurement skills
across public sector bodies. The Office of Government Commerce,
as part of the reform of the Government Procurement Service, was
in the process of creating a secondment model which would facilitate
this.[24]
23. Timely and appropriate guidance can assist public
authorities in procuring and managing PFI projects effectively.
Detailed Treasury guidance on value testing was not, however,
issued until October 2006 after the initial value tests had already
taken place. But even the growing body of written guidance that
now exists on how to procure and manage PFI deals is no substitute
for practical experience and training to equip local officials
with the necessary skills.[25]
20 C&AG's Report (1), Figure 2; Q 89 Back
21
Qq 6, 28, 30, 37-41, 71 Back
22
Qq 6, 41-43; C&AG's Report (1), case example 4 Back
23
C&AG's Report (1), paras 2.9, 3.13, 3.23; Q 130 Back
24
Qq 20, 25-26; C&AG's Report (2), para 2.21 Back
25
Qq 18, 53-54, 74-76; C&AG's Report (2), paras 3.1, 3.5 Back
|