Select Committee on Trade and Industry Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-66)

SUSSEX ENERGY GROUP

17 OCTOBER 2006

  Q60  Chairman: We are going to Woking in a couple of weeks' time.

  Dr Watson: I will not second-guess what they will tell you then.

  Q61  Judy Mallaber: Can it be done by other people?

  Dr Watson: I think they will tell you it can but I must admit that I do not fully understand the details, if you like the business model of how that has been made to work. But a certain amount of will on the part of that particular individual and real effort has been made and they have made it work. So I think the Woking example is a very important example. I am just not sure how far that can be replicated to other places, but certainly the person responsible is now with the London Climate Change Agency and is thinking about implementing similar things on a larger scale in London itself.

  Q62  Judy Mallaber: What is the Kirklees example?

  Dr Watson: The Kirklees example is rolling out, in particular, solar PV around housing and schemes to do that. Raphael has done a little reading up on that one recently.

  Mr Sauter: The main part was they are only focused on PV technology, which they tried to install in new buildings or refurbishments of public buildings and in particular new residential areas, and I think the target was to cover 5% of the local electricity demand by PV and it was a project that was co-funded by the European Commission in the framework of other European projects, which was obviously quite successful also in terms of decrease of costs of PV, setting up of a local installers' network. This is what I know of the Kirklees case.

  Dr Watson: I think the general conclusion on these local experiments—there are lots of them, you can point to Leicester as well where they have an eco-house and they have put wind turbines in schools and that kind of thing, and one of my students looked at the example of Nottingham, where they have had again a very active energy adviser in the council who has helped people apply for grants for solar hot water heating systems—the people concerned said that, "It was that person who really made the decision for me to go and do that." So I think that local activities have a tremendous role to play and are probably under-resourced.

  Q63  Judy Mallaber: How feasible is it? Can a local authority do something substantial within their resources or does this require a lot of expensive set-up money to get going?

  Dr Watson: I think it has been demonstrated that they can. Another example is the Merton 10% rule, which is using the planning system for new buildings to get 10% of energy from on-site renewables on new buildings in general. So there are powers that they have but I think particular areas that we hear about that are under-resourced are things like the independent energy advice and that is a potential role for councils and is something that could come under their remit, and that could be strengthened a lot, particularly into the area of microgeneration.

  Q64  Mr Binley: The resource issue is a very important one because you are talking about a historical situation and I think that if we were to get this moving we would need to rethink because at the moment money in local government is very scarce indeed, and you know that the whole PFI thing impacts upon this too. So have you done any work on this as the situation stands at this moment?

  Dr Watson: No, we have not; that is not an area we would look at.

  Q65  Mr Bone: We are having thousands of new homes built in my constituency as part of Government policy and I think what my council was saying was why on earth has the Government not made it a condition of the new house building that renewable energy is built into it as well as efficiency, and I think they wanted a view on that, why the Government has not been bolder on new-build?

  Dr Watson: I have asked the same question and one of the positives in the Energy Review announced a study of the Thames Gateway Development, for example, as to how that could be made lower carbon than it otherwise would be, because a lot of these concepts and ideas for distributed energy networks, lots of distributed sources at different scales and the kind of way in which those grids might be controlled, which is very different to our centralised system, and I think those new developments are a golden opportunity to put those in from the start because it is much cheaper to do it that way. So I would certainly hope that the government would be much stronger as looking at those as real opportunities to do things like this.

  Q66  Chairman: At the risk of repeating myself, that technology in those individual homes will quite often be local heat systems rather than electricity generation systems.

  Dr Watson: Yes, I talked about grids but, apologies, I meant heat as well and that is as important if not more important, perhaps.

  Chairman: Thank you very much; we have covered a very interesting evidence session. We are most grateful to you both.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 30 January 2007