Select Committee on Trade and Industry Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 178-179)

INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

23 OCTOBER 2006

  Q178 Chairman: Welcome to this small but intimate and, I am sure, fascinating session of our inquiry. Can you introduce yourself?

  Prof Loughhead: My name is John Loughhead. I am here representing the Institution of Engineering and Technology, which is a professional engineering institution in the UK. It is the largest of those institutions. We represent about 150,000 members, most of whom are registered as chartered or incorporated engineers. Within the Institution, we have a number of panels which look at particular aspects of policy or questions which are of interest to the government. I happen currently to chair the Energy Sector Panel of the Institution and consequently we made the response to the consultation when it came out. We do not act in favour of any particular interest here. We try to give evidence simply on the basis of the engineering implications or facts associated with them.

  Q179  Chairman: Facts are what we are after. There is a lot of interest in microgeneration and a lot of people make some very big claims for what it can achieve for the United Kingdom. Rising concern about gas prices is focusing quite a lot of interest in the media on this. What is your headline on how important it all is? Is it just a lot of hot air or is there real substance in interest in microgeneration? What is your take on the overall position?

  Prof Loughhead: Microgeneration does offer certain possibilities in certain circumstances to make efficiencies in the usage of energy or alternatively as a means of collecting renewable energy. In terms of the energy consumption of the UK as a whole, it could potentially, in the long term, start to make a truly material contribution but frankly it is our opinion that in the short to medium term it will make a comparatively modest contribution to that. We would see the main benefits of microgeneration systems as being as a means of collecting renewable energies which all suffer from the fact that they are highly diffuse—in other words, very low energy densities—and therefore, if you are going to collect any significant amount, you have to cover large geographical areas of collection to do that. Having systems which are placed on domestic or small industrial, commercial dwellings or sites, is one way of tackling that. The second option it gives you is that if we are using a primary fuel such as gas or coal it does give you the opportunity to use that conversion either integrated into some industrial system or alternatively to generate both electricity and heat at the same time. That gives you certain efficiencies in the use of the fuel. Those efficiencies are only comparable to the efficiencies that are claimed for modern condensing boilers.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 30 January 2007