Select Committee on Trade and Industry Eleventh Report


Conclusions and recommendations


Migration

1.  Worker Registration Scheme data are not a net measure of A8 migration nor are they a measure of the number of A8 nationals currently living in the UK. It is therefore a matter of serious concern to us that the Department of Work and Pensions has no better statistical source from which to gauge the impact of A8 migration to the UK. (Paragraph 9)

2.  The lack of accurate or adequate information on the number of A8/A2 nationals working in the UK or from which countries they come is a matter of concern because of the consequences for wide areas of public policy. The available evidence suggests that Poles are the largest population, followed by Lithuanians and Slovaks. We recommend that, at the very least, the next census contain specific questions to ensure that more accurate data are available to enable the Government and the new Statistics Board fully to gauge the penetration of A8/A2 nationals in the labour market. We also recommend that the Government give urgent consideration to how it can improve the information it collects on A8/A2 immigration before the next census. (Paragraph 14)

Impacts of immigration

3.  Our witnesses told us that the A8/A2 nationals who come to the UK to work tend to be the 'best and the brightest' and that their skills and work ethic are the major reasons why employers find them attractive employees. It is clear from the evidence we received that A8/A2 migration has helped plug skills gaps as well as alleviating labour shortages in certain sectors of the economy. (Paragraph 18)

4.  A8/A2 migrants tend to find work in the UK for which they are overqualified. This could be said to have a negative impact on the economic efficiency of Europe as a whole—their home countries are losing skills and the UK is not maximising its advantage from them. Nonetheless there is some evidence that A8/A2 nationals who remain in the UK are starting to move into the higher-paid, more skilled jobs for which they are better suited. Whilst we welcome this, it has caused labour shortages in agricultural industries that had previously relied on Eastern European workers entering the UK through the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme (SAWS). We find it remarkable in these circumstances that the Government is proposing to allow only Bulgarian and Romanian nationals to apply through SAWS. (Paragraph 21)

5.  The evidence on whether A8/A2 migration has slowed wage growth in the UK economy is mixed. The Government suggests that it has had no discernable impact. Other studies suggest there may have been a slowing of wage inflation through an overall increase in the labour supply. The Low Pay Commission's report into migration in general concluded that a small decrease in wage growth at the lowest levels was more than compensated for by modest increases at higher levels of pay. What the studies that have found an impact agree on is that such impacts are small in the context of the whole economy. We do not rule out more significant impacts in the context of specific sectors and we will be returning to this issue during our forthcoming inquiry into the construction industry. (Paragraph 26)

6.  Concerns have been raised that employers may be less inclined to pursue recruitment strategies aimed at the long-term unemployed due to the presence of skilled Central and Eastern European alternatives. Nonetheless, we have seen no evidence to suggest that immigration from the A8/A2 countries since their accession has increased claimant unemployment in the UK. (Paragraph 29)

Overall impact

7.  Migration from the A8 since 2004 has benefited the UK economy and UK business, chiefly by filling gaps in the labour market. The Government's decision to open the UK labour market to A8 nationals has been beneficial from a labour market perspective because it has allowed workers to move flexibly between sectors following employer demand. Nonetheless, the Government should be aware that this has created shortages of seasonal labour in agriculture, which had previously relied on labour from restricted migration schemes. (Paragraph 31)

8.  We believe it is too soon to make a judgement on the decision to introduce restrictions on Bulgarian and Romanian nationals—but we note that countries in the A8 experiencing labour shortages are using labour from the A2 to plug those gaps. (Paragraph 32)

Exploitative Employment

9.  Migrants from the A8/A2 countries should be clear that, as European Union citizens, they are entitled to the same protection in terms of the minimum wage, employment conditions, union membership and health and safety as a UK citizen. We encourage the Government to work closely with the A8/A2 nations to ensure that new and potential arrivals are made aware of their rights at the earliest possible opportunity. (Paragraph 36)

10.  We note that whilst the Gangmaster Licensing Authority has helped address the problem of exploitative employment by intermediaries in the agricultural sector there are no similar arrangements in other sectors where intermediaries play a large part in recruitment. We recommend that the Government give urgent consideration to extending the Gangmaster Licensing Authority's remit. (Paragraph 37)

Long-Term Impacts

11.  There is not enough data to make an accurate prediction of the numbers of A8/A2 nationals who will be living in the UK in the medium to long term; UK business cannot take this supply of skilled, willing labour for granted. Although A8/A2 labour has eased labour shortages in a number of sectors it is not a long-term solution to those problems. We recommend that the Office for National Statistics and its successor body investigate the returnee rate among A8/A2 nationals and that Government and business work together to ensure that a skills and labour vacuum is not left behind when, and if, the flow of A8/A2 nationals to the UK slows or reverses. (Paragraph 42)

12.   The presence of large numbers of A8 nationals in the UK and the goodwill generated in those countries by the opening of the UK labour market offer excellent opportunities for better business links between these countries and the UK, especially when, and if, those migrants begin to return home. Government and business need to develop strategies to maximise the UK competitive advantage gained from these returnees by, for example, ensuring effective British chambers of commerce are supported in these countries, developing cultural links and targeting UKTI resources. This is a significant and potentially highly beneficial long-term consequence of migration to which insufficient public policy attention has been given; greater attention should be paid to it if the advantages to the UK are to be maximised. (Paragraph 43)

EU Funding

13.  The significant influx of EU money into the A8/A2 during the 2007-2013 funding period will provide excellent opportunities for UK companies—particularly in the fields of construction and financing. The ministers and officials we met during our visits indicated that they were determined to achieve the best value possible and would welcome British involvement in the resulting investment. We hope that the British government and business look seriously at the new opportunities that will arise from these developments. (Paragraph 47)

Labour Market

14.  Our witnesses cited the labour market as one of the major attractions of the A8 as investment locations due to the strong work ethic and technical skills of the workforce combined with relatively low labour costs. The evidence we received suggest that it is no longer accurate to describe the A8 as 'low-cost economies'. Although average labour costs remain just over a quarter of those in the EU15, genuinely low-cost, low-skill production is already heading further east, to the A2, Ukraine and China where wage rates are much lower. Employers in the A8/A2 countries repeatedly stressed to us that skills, not wages, were the major reason for their presence in the A8/A2 countries. This was further reinforced by government officials and ministers from the countries we visited, who accepted that their countries could not compete on cost with China, India or other emerging economies. (Paragraph 55)

15.  One of the major economic challenges facing the A8/A2 at present is a growing labour shortage in the areas most attractive to overseas investment. Foreign investment is often concentrated around the major cities, increasing demand for labour in areas with relatively small populations. Rather than move to the cities to meet this demand many A8/A2 nationals—and especially the most skilled—are choosing to move to Western Europe, in effect putting employers based in Bratislava, Vilnius or Warsaw in direct competition for labour with employers in London or Dublin as well as local rivals. In some areas and sectors—for example the Lithuanian construction industry or the highest levels of company management—we were told that this is pushing wage costs up towards Western European levels. The people we spoke to during our visits emphasised that these shortages were a real problem for new companies seeking to move into well established sectors. (Paragraph 56)

Transparency and Corruption

16.  We commend the work being done by UK embassies in A8/A2 countries, for example in Hungary, to combat corruption. We recommend that the UK continues to be active through its embassies to assist national governments in building upon the improvements of the last ten years and further reducing corruption. (Paragraph 57)

Ease of Doing Business

17.  As with any overseas market, the A8/A2 countries present a range of challenges to UK investors and exporters. Our witnesses raised concerns about complex, unfamiliar and slow administrative and legal procedures in many of the A8/A2 countries—although we note that similar concerns are also raised about some well-established EU15 countries. Nonetheless, we believe that in terms of high-growth economies worldwide the A8/A2 countries present relatively few barriers to entry and relatively few risks. Their relative nearness to the UK, membership of the European Union and open economies are key competitive advantages for the A8/A2 countries in dealing with UK business. (Paragraph 62)

Size of Market

18.  Although the A8/A2 countries are relatively small when compared to the major emerging economies—both in terms of population and GDP—we were reminded that when these countries joined the European Union their combined economy was the size of the Netherlands; now Poland alone has a larger economy than that of the Netherlands and it buys £2.8 billion a year worth of UK exports—around the same as China. (Paragraph 65)

The Future

19.  British government and business should be aware that the more forward-thinking A8/A2 countries are actively targeting high-value-added sectors such as biotechnology, ICT and pharmaceuticals and are seeking to attract research and development and other innovative investments—for example Samsung's and Kia's investments in Slovakia or GlaxoSmithKlein's vaccine research facilities in Hungary. This is both a significant opportunity for partnership—making use of the skills bases, newly built facilities and dynamism of these countries and the new opportunities that come with a developing market—and a potential competitive challenge for UK business in the longer term. UK policy makers need to recognise that in attempting to build an innovation-driven economy, our potential partners and competitors are not limited to the USA, France and Germany; the A8/A2 countries are increasingly becoming home to facilities of a very high level of sophistication and technical knowhow. (Paragraph 69)

UK Trade and Investment with the A8/A2 Countries

20.  There is a widespread belief among our witnesses both in the UK and overseas that UK businesses were slow to take advantage of the opportunities opened up by the ending of Soviet control of Central and Eastern Europe and the A8/A2's subsequent accession to the European Union. Whilst interest in some sectors—such as manufacturing—is growing and beginning to make an impact, it is clear that investing early in newly opened markets brings significant competitive advantages. This echoes the findings of our predecessor Committees in the 1997-1998 and 1999-2000 sessions. We were therefore particularly disappointed to find that many of the concerns raised in those Reports about UK reluctance to invest in or trade with the Baltic and Central European states were repeated almost word for word by our witnesses in this inquiry. In particular it is regrettable that the UK retail banking sector has failed to establish a presence in these markets. (Paragraph 79)

21.  In view of the evidence we received in this inquiry stressing the importance of being well informed and investing early in rapidly developing economies, we propose to conduct an inquiry into the future of trade and investment relations with Turkey. (Paragraph 80)

22.  During our inquiry we came to the conclusion that a major reason for the relative lack of UK investment and trade with the A8/A2 was an 'iron curtain in the mind' of UK businesses. We were particularly concerned to hear from the British Chambers of Commerce that many UK businesses lack the confidence to invest in emerging markets. Awareness of developments in Central and Eastern Europe appears to be lagging behind reality. This raises the question as to whether an organisation such as UKTI should entirely follow the priorities of business, or whether it should be more active in promoting areas where UK business may be missing out and educating them about the vibrancy, high skills and ambitions of many of these economies. (Paragraph 81)

23.  As with our previous inquiries into trade and investment opportunities in Mercosur, China and India we heard that other countries make more frequent use of Ministerial visits for trade promotion purposes. We believe that British ministers—especially those in trade promotion roles—should follow the example of our competitors and travel abroad more frequently to promote the UK interest. To assist in this, firm agreements should be established between government and opposition to ensure that ministers on trade missions should not have to return to the House to vote, other than in the most exceptional circumstances. In this context we welcome the current Minister for Trade Promotion and Investment's announced intention to spend more time undertaking such overseas visits as a step in the right direction. We note, however, that many of our competitors more regularly use much more senior ministers, including prime ministers and presidents to lead trade missions and assist in the negotiation of major deals than is the tradition for British ministers. (Paragraph 82)

Trade Promotion

24.  We are concerned that UKTI has adopted a 'one size fits all' approach to European Union member states—cutting back on resources in the A8/A2 at a similar rate to the resources in the EU15. The A8/2 are in many ways more accessible markets, especially for SMEs, than other rapidly growing economies. Nonetheless the lack of awareness of opportunities in these countries suggests there is still a significant need for advice and assistance over and above that which is required in more established markets. Although 'emerging markets' may not be the most appropriate term for these economies, we think there is a good case for some, or all, of the A8/A2 to receive priority attention from UKTI. (Paragraph 83)

Relocation

25.  The accession of the A8/A2 has led some companies to move production and other business activities from the UK to these countries. This has led to concern that UK jobs are being 'exported' overseas. The evidence we received suggests that a degree of relocation has been necessary to maintain UK companies' competitiveness in the face of global competition and can be compensated for to some extent by resulting gains in employment in higher value-added areas of the same industry. Nonetheless, it is clear that some sectors—such as IT and automotive—are experiencing net reductions in their UK based workforce. We would welcome a comprehensive study into the net effects on UK business and employment of relocation overseas to inform public policy responses more accurately. (Paragraph 89)

26.  Although the A8/A2 have proved attractive locations for UK companies looking to offshore some of their business activities, the evidence we received suggests that the phenomenon itself was not a direct consequence of these countries' accession to the European Union. Rather, relocation overseas has been driven by global competition from a variety of locations—including the A8/A2 but also Asia and more widely. (Paragraph 90)

Conclusions

27.  We believe that the accession of the A8/A2 to the European Union has been beneficial to the UK economy and business, chiefly through the plugging of gaps in the UK labour market, but also through increased opportunities for exports and investment. Longer-term opportunities from migrants returning to their home countries after a period in the UK need to be thought through and explored more systematically. (Paragraph 91)

28.  We are concerned that many of the messages we have heard from other rapidly growing economies—such as Brazil or India—about UK business being slow to take full advantage of opportunities in rapidly growing markets apply equally to Central and Eastern Europe. Although we realise that not every company should invest in every country we believe that the Government should look seriously at what it can do to reduce the 'fear factor' of investing outside UK businesses' comfort zones. This is particularly true in the new member states, which are relatively accessible to small and medium sized companies and could provide a way for such companies to 'cut their teeth' abroad. The opportunities in and challenges from these often highly skilled and ambitious economies need to be better understood. (Paragraph 92)

29.  This inquiry has reiterated the importance of improving the skills of the UK workforce if UK business wishes to remain globally competitive. The accession of the A8/A2 has eased the pressures generated by a shortage of skilled staff for many companies, but this should not distract either government or business from the longer-term task of improving the skills profile of the domestic workforce. (Paragraph 93)


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 18 October 2007