House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 20th November 2007                

346

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

a member of a youth offending team,

 

(b)    

an officer of a local probation team, or

 

(c)    

a social worker of a local authority.’.

 


 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

89

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  35,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘50’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

90

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  35,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘45’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

91

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  35,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘35’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

92

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  35,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘30’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

93

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  35,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘25’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

94

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  43,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘50’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

95

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  43,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘45’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 20th November 2007                

347

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

96

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  43,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘35’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

97

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  43,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘30’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

98

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  43,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘25’.

 


 

Mr David Hanson

 

49

 

Schedule  5,  page  155,  line  7,  leave out ‘“convicted”’ and insert ‘“conviction”’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

50

 

Schedule  5,  page  155,  line  17,   leave out ‘and’ and insert—

 

‘(aa)    

in paragraph (b), for the words following “conviction” there were

 

substituted “must be, in the case of an amount in default which is

 

specified in the first column of the following Table, not more than the

 

number of hours set out opposite that amount in the second column.

 

TABLE

 
 

Amount

Number of

 
  

hours

 
 

An amount not exceeding £250

8

 
 

An amount exceeding £250 but

14

 
 

not exceeding £500

  
 

An amount exceeding £500

24”,’.

 
 

Mr David Hanson

 

51

 

Schedule  5,  page  155,  line  18,  leave out ‘18”’ and insert ‘12”’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

52

 

Schedule  5,  page  155,  line  26,  leave out ‘12’ and insert ‘10’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 20th November 2007                

348

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

Mr David Hanson

 

53

 

Schedule  5,  page  155,  line  28,  leave out ‘16”’ and insert ‘12”’.

 


 

Mr David Hanson

 

207

 

Clause  26,  page  19,  leave out lines 33 to 38 and insert—

 

‘“(1A)    

For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), the conviction is not unsafe if the Court

 

think that there is no reasonable doubt about the appellant’s guilt.

 

(1B)    

Subsection (1A) does not require the Court to dismiss the appeal if they think that

 

it would seriously undermine the proper administration of justice to allow the

 

conviction to stand.” ’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

100

 

Clause  26,  page  19,  line  34,  at end insert ‘and they have a certificate from the trial

 

judge confirming that the evidence heard by him and the jury was sufficient to prove the

 

prosecution case and that he had admitted and the jury had considered, and been directed

 

by him in relation to, the relevance of any evidence of the procedural or other

 

misconduct.’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

208

 

Clause  26,  page  19,  line  38,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

In section 13 (disposal of appeal against verdict of not guilty by reason of

 

insanity), after subsection (1) insert—

 

“(1A)    

For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), the verdict shall not be regarded as

 

unsafe for a reason unrelated to the correctness of the finding of insanity

 

if the Court think that there is no reasonable doubt that the accused did

 

the act or made the omission charged.

 

(1B)    

Subsection (1A) does not require the Court to dismiss the appeal if they

 

think that it would seriously undermine the proper administration of

 

justice to allow the verdict to stand.”

 

(2B)    

In section 16 (disposal of appeal against finding of disability), after subsection (1)

 

insert—

 

“(1A)    

For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), a finding shall not be regarded as

 

unsafe for a reason unrelated to the correctness of the finding that the

 

accused is under a disability if the Court think that there is no reasonable

 

doubt that the accused did the act or made the omission charged.

 

(1B)    

Subsection (1A) does not require the Court to dismiss the appeal if they

 

think that it would seriously undermine the proper administration of

 

justice to allow the finding to stand.”’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

209

 

Clause  26,  page  20,  line  5,  leave out ‘against conviction’ and insert ‘under this


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 20th November 2007                

349

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

Part’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

101

 

Clause  26,  page  20,  leave out line 14 and add ‘may, as the Court think fit in the interests

 

of justice in that case, either direct that there be a retrial or that the appellant be

 

acquitted.”’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

102

 

Clause  26,  page  20,  line  14,  at end add ‘, who must initiate or not initiate such

 

criminal or civil proceedings (or both) as he thinks best suit the justice of the case (taking

 

into account the impact on the victim of the offence or his family of his decision either to

 

proceed or not) and which decision either to proceed or not will provide the most suitable

 

redress to the subject of such misconduct, deter any such misconduct in the future and

 

restore public confidence in the criminal justice system.”’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

Mr David Heath

 

David Howarth

 

99

 

Page  19,  line  29,  leave out Clause 26.

 


 

Mr David Hanson

 

79

 

Clause  28,  page  20,  line  22,  leave out ‘In’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

80

 

Clause  28,  page  20,  line  22,  after ‘sentencing)’ insert ‘is amended as follows.’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

81

 

Clause  28,  page  20,  line  24,  after ‘to’ insert ‘a case in which the judge made’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

82

 

Clause  28,  page  20,  line  25,  leave out ‘order under that section’ and insert

 

‘sentence’.

 

Mr David Hanson

 

83

 

Clause  28,  page  20,  line  36,  at end add—

 

‘( )    

In subsection (9) after paragraph (b) insert ‘‘and


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Revised 20 November 2007