House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

70

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

183

 

Clause  5,  page  3,  line  18,  leave out paragraph (e).

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

184

 

Clause  5,  page  3,  line  5,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

A statement may be designated as a national policy statement for the purposes of

 

this Act only if 4 months have elapsed since the proposals were sent to Parliament

 

and the Secretary of State has considered any report produced by any committee

 

of either House of Parliament on the proposals.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment prevents a national policy statement from being designated unless the proposal

 

has been sent to Parliament and it has had an opportunity to report on the proposal. The Secretary

 

of State has to consider the report.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

185

 

Clause  6,  page  3,  line  31,  at beginning insert—

 

‘(A1)    

The Secretary of State shall consider continuously whether each national policy

 

statement should be reviewed.

 

(A2)    

The Secretary of State shall lay before Parliament and publish each year a report

 

on the national policy statements which have been designated and whether a

 

review is being carried out or will be carried out.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment seeks to a provide a continuous review, as raised on Clause 10.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

186

 

Clause  7,  page  4,  line  9,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

The Secretary of State shall provide for early public participation, when all

 

options are open and effective public participation can take place, within a

 

transparent and fair framework.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment incorporates into the Bill obligations in the Aarhus Convention on Access to In­


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

71

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

formation, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Mat­

 

ters which apply to public participation concerning plans, programmes and policies relating to the

 

environment. The text is taken from Articles 6(4) and 7.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

187

 

Clause  7,  page  4,  line  13,  leave out ‘subsections (4) and (5)’ and insert ‘the rest of

 

this section’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment makes the Secretary of State’s discretion on consultation requirements subject to

 

the remainder of section 7 rather than particular subsections to accommodate additional subsec­

 

tions.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

188

 

Clause  7,  page  4,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

The consultation period shall not be less than 12 weeks.

 

(2B)    

The publicity arrangements shall include advertisement in one or more national

 

newspapers and the Gazette, placing the proposal and relevant supporting

 

material on the Secretary of State’s website and giving notice to Parliament.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment provides for a minimum consultation period and a minimum level of publicity.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

189

 

Clause  7,  page  4,  line  19,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

If the national policy statement relates, in whole or part, to England the Secretary

 

of State shall consult Natural England, the Historic Buildings and Monuments

 

Commission for England, the Environment Agency and the Local Government

 

Association.

 

(4B)    

If the national policy statement relates, in whole or part, to Scotland, the Secretary

 

of State shall consult the Scottish Executive, the Scottish Environment Protection

 

Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Convention of Scottish Local

 

Authorities.

 

(4C)    

If the national policy statement relates, in whole or part, to Wales, the Secretary

 

of State shall consult the Welsh Assembly Government, the Environment

 

Agency, the Countryside Council for Wales and the Welsh Local Government

 

Association.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment provides that the main environmental agencies and the devolved executives are


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

72

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

consulted on national policy statements.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

190

 

Clause  7,  page  4,  line  23,  at end insert—

 

‘(5A)    

The publicity to be taken under subsection (5) shall include advertisement in a

 

newspaper circulating in the locality, the display of one or more site notices at the

 

location and placing copies of the proposal and relevant supporting material for

 

inspection by the public at one or more places in or convenient to the location.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment provides minimum standards of publicity in locations identified as suitable or po­

 

tentially suitable for a specified description of a development.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

191

 

Clause  7,  page  4,  line  23,  at end insert—

 

‘(5B)    

If subsection (5) applies, any authority required to be consulted under section 8

 

shall also be consulted on the proposal.

 

(5C)    

If subsection (5) applies, the Secretary of State shall consult any parish or town

 

council (if in England) or any community council (if in Wales) whose area

 

includes the location or is within 10 miles of the location.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Clause 8 requires the Secretary of State to consult various authorities as to the appropriate pub­

 

licity to give to location specific proposals. The amendment requires that those authorities are con­

 

sulted upon the proposals themselves. It also requires town and parish councils and community

 

councils in the vicinity to be consulted.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

192

 

Clause  11,  page  5,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

No statement referred to within subsection (1) above may be designated as a

 

national policy statement or referred to in such a statement unless it has been

 

subject to environmental assessment in accordance with the Environmental

 

Assessment of Plans and Programmes Directive 2001/42/EC and regulations

 

implementing that Directive.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment requires a pre-existing statement which is to be designated as a national policy

 

statement to have been subject to strategic environmental assessment.


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

73

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

193

 

Clause  11,  page  5,  line  36,  leave out subsection (3).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment requires consultation on a proposed national policy statement to take place under

 

the Act and so excludes reliance on pre-commencement consultation.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

194

 

Page  6,  line  1,  leave out Clause 12.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment deletes Clause 12 on legal challenges. The effect is that any proceedings will be

 

brought under the normal provisions on judicial review, which provide for claims to be brought

 

within three months and promptly.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

195

 

Clause  12,  page  6,  line  6,  leave out ‘6’ and insert ‘12’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment increases the period for bringing proceedings from six weeks to 12 weeks.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

196

 

Clause  12,  page  6,  line  13,  leave out ‘6’ and insert ‘12’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 195.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

197

 

Clause  12,  page  6,  line  18,  leave out ‘6’ and insert ‘12’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

74

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

See explanatory statement to amendment 195.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

198

 

Clause  12,  page  6,  line  25,  leave out ‘6’ and insert ‘12’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 195.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

199

 

Clause  12,  page  6,  line  32,  leave out ‘6’ and insert ‘12’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 195.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

200

 

Clause  12,  page  6,  line  38,  leave out ‘6’ and insert ‘12’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 195.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

201

 

Clause  32,  page  17,  line  5,  leave out ‘section 42(5)’ and insert ‘sections 37, 42 and

 

43’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment extends the scope of the consultation report to consultation under Clause 37 and

 

publicity under Clause 43, from community consultation under Clause 42, in line with Clause

 

49(5).


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

75

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

202

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  21,  leave out subsection (4) and insert—

 

‘(4)    

The Commission shall disclose a person’s request for advice under subsection (1)

 

and the advice given under subsection (1) to a person to the public generally.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment requires requests for advice and the advice given to be made public. The existing

 

Clause 49(4) which allows regulations to provide whether this material is disclosed becomes un­

 

necessary and is deleted.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

203

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  line  8,  leave out ‘from a local-authority consultee’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

204

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  leave out lines 10 to 14.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The Commission can only validate an application if the pre-application procedure has been com­

 

plied with. In doing so it has to have regard to representations on the adequacy of consultation

 

from local authorities (Clause 49(4)). The amendments require it to have regard to any represen­

 

tations on the adequacy of consultation.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

205

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  line  17,  leave out ‘and 43’ and insert ‘, 43 and 44’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The Commission considers whether the applicant has taken account of the responses to consulta­

 

tion and publicity (Clause 49(3)(d)). The amendment extends the ‘adequacy-of-consultation rep­

 

resentation’ to include comments whether account has been taken of those responses.


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 10th January 2008                

76

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

206

 

Clause  66,  page  32,  line  40,  at beginning insert ‘Subject to subsection (1A)

 

below,’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

207

 

Clause  66,  page  33,  line  2,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

Where the applicant for development consent proposes, or it is subsequently

 

considered by the Panel that, any order granting development consent should

 

include provisions made in exercise of any of the powers conferred by section

 

105(6)(a) or (b), the Panel has the functions of—

 

(a)    

examining the application, and

 

(b)    

making a report to the Secretary of State on the application setting out—

 

(i)    

the Panel’s findings and conclusions in respect of the

 

application, and

 

(ii)    

the Panel’s recommendation as to the decision to be made on the

 

application.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment provides that the Secretary of State will decide the application where it is pro­

 

posed that the order granting development consent will apply, modify or exclude legislation.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

208

 

Clause  75,  page  36,  line  9,  at end insert ‘and neither the applicant for development

 

consent proposes, nor the Commissioner considers, that any order granting development

 

consent should include provisions made in exercise of any of the powers conferred by

 

section105(6)(a) or (b).’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment provides that the Secretary of State will decide the application where it is pro­

 

posed by the applicant or the single Commissioner considering the application that any order

 

granting development consent will apply, modify or exclude legislation.


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 11 January 2008