House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

333

 

House of Commons

 
 

Thursday 24th January 2008

 

Public Bill Committee

 

New Amendments handed in are marked thus Parliamentary Star

 

Other Amendments not tabled within the required notice period are marked thus Parliamentary Star - white

 

Planning Bill


 

Note

 

The Amendments have been arranged in accordance with the Order of the

 

Committee [8th January 2008].

 


 

John Healey

 

51

 

Clause  38,  page  18,  line  33,  leave out ‘district council’ and insert ‘county council,

 

or district council,’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

Clauses 37 and 38 require the applicant to consult the district council in an area where there are

 

two tiers of local authority. This amendment (read with amendment 52) has the effect that the

 

county council must also be consulted in such an area.

 

John Healey

 

52

 

Clause  38,  page  18,  leave out lines 34 and 35.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See Member's explanatory statement for amendment 51.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

168

 

Clause  38,  page  18,  line  39,  leave out ‘or’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

169

 

Clause  38,  page  19,  line  2,  at end add—

 

‘(h)    

a parish council,


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 24th January 2008                

334

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

(i)    

a community council in Wales, or

 

(j)    

a community council in Scotland.’.

 


 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

170

 

Clause  39,  page  19,  line  5,  at end insert ‘, or adjacent land’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

171

 

Clause  39,  page  19,  line  8,  at end insert ‘adjacent land, or’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

172

 

Clause  39,  page  19,  line  10,  at end insert ‘adjacent land, or’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

173

 

Clause  39,  page  19,  line  11,  at end insert ‘or adjacent land’.

 


 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

62

 

Clause  40,  page  19,  line  35,  leave out ‘28’ and insert ‘56’.

 


 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

63

 

Clause  42,  page  20,  line  8,  at end add ‘and those who might be significantly

 

affected by the development’.

 

John Healey

 

357

 

Clause  42,  page  20,  line  10,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

The deadline for the receipt by the applicant of a local authority’s response to

 

consultation under subsection (2) is the end of the period of 28 days that begins

 

with the day after the day on which the local authority receives the consultation

 

documents.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 24th January 2008                

335

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

(2B)    

In subsection (2A) “the consultation documents” means the documents supplied

 

to the local authority by the applicant for the purpose of consulting the local

 

authority under subsection (2).’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment gives relevant local authorities 28 days in which to respond to the consultation

 

which Clause 42(2) requires the applicant to carry out.

 

John Healey

 

358

 

Clause  42,  page  20,  line  12,  leave out ‘received by the applicant’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The effect of this amendment, together with amendment 359, is that the applicant must have regard

 

to responses from local authorities only if they are received before the deadline introduced by

 

amendment 357.

 

John Healey

 

359

 

Clause  42,  page  20,  line  13,  after ‘(2)’ insert ‘that is received by the applicant

 

before the deadline imposed by subsection (2A)’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See Member's explanatory statement for amendment 358.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

174

 

Clause  42,  page  20,  line  21,  leave out subsection (5) and insert—

 

‘(5)    

The Commission must commission an independent third party (“third party”) to

 

undertake such community engagement in relation to an application for

 

development as the relevant local planning authority considers appropriate within

 

a set period (“the community engagement period”) of not more than six months.

 

(6)    

The third party shall be required to publish a report (“the community engagement

 

report”) on its work within 14 days of the end of the community engagement

 

period.

 

(7)    

The community engagement report will publish responses from interested parties,

 

including but not limited to those defined as Categories 1, 2 and 3 in section 39.

 

(8)    

The applicant must within three months of the publication of the community

 

engagement report publish a response to indicate its intentions to change the

 

application.

 

(9)    

The application for development consent may not make progress until such time

 

as the applicant has complied with subsection (8).

 

(10)    

If the applicant has not complied with subsection (8) after a period of six months

 

the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn.’.

 



 
 

Public Bill Committee: 24th January 2008                

336

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Richard Benyon

 

James Duddridge

 

Mr David Curry

 

326

 

Clause  44,  page  20,  line  37,  at end insert ‘and to a statement of impacts and

 

mitigation made under section (Duty to identify and mitigate adverse impacts).’.

 


 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

232

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  10,  leave out ‘The Commission may give advice’ and

 

insert ‘The Secretary of State may, in connection with securing propriety, by regulations

 

make provision about the giving of advice by an existing government body appointed for

 

this purpose’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

These amendments are intended to ensure that advice for potential applicants for nationally

 

significant infrastructure development is provided by an existing Government agency.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

13

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  13,  after ‘representations’, insert ‘including oral

 

submissions and cross examination of witnesses’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

233

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  15,  leave out ‘Commission may not under subsection (1)’

 

and insert ‘body appointed by regulations under subsection (1) may not under that

 

subsection’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 232.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 24th January 2008                

337

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

234

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  17,  leave out subsection (3).

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 232.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

202

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  21,  leave out subsection (4) and insert—

 

‘(4)    

The Commission shall disclose a person’s request for advice under subsection (1)

 

and the advice given under subsection (1) to a person to the public generally.’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The amendment requires requests for advice and the advice given to be made public. The existing

 

Clause 49(4) which allows regulations to provide whether this material is disclosed becomes

 

unnecessary and is deleted.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

235

 

Clause  45,  page  21,  line  25,  leave out ‘Commission’ and insert ‘appointed body’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

See explanatory statement to amendment 232.

 


 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

262

 

Clause  46,  page  21,  line  41,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

The applicant shall pay the recipient’s reasonable costs of complying with the

 

notice.’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

175

 

Clause  46,  page  22,  line  17,  leave out ‘14’ and insert ‘56’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 24th January 2008                

338

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

263

 

Clause  46,  page  22,  line  17,  leave out ‘14’ and insert ‘28’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment gives a reasonable time to landowners to respond to requests for information.

 


 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

14

 

Clause  47,  page  23,  line  11,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

Subsection (1) shall come into force on such a day as the Secretary of State may

 

by order made by statutory instrument appoint.’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

176

 

Clause  47,  page  23,  line  27,  leave out ‘14’ and insert ‘56’.

 


 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

177

 

Clause  48,  page  24,  line  16,  leave out from ‘land’ to end of line 17.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

178

 

Clause  48,  page  24,  line  21,  leave out subsections (3) and (4).

 


 

John Healey

 

360

 

Clause  49,  page  24,  line  41,  at end insert—

 

‘(ba)    

that development consent is required for any of the development to which

 

the application relates,’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The effect of this amendment is that the Commission can accept an application for development

 

consent only if it concludes that development consent is required for all or some of the development

 

to which the application relates.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 24th January 2008                

339

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

John Healey

 

361

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  line  1,  leave out ‘it’ and insert ‘the application’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This amendment is consequent on amendment 360.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

203

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  line  8,  leave out ‘from a local-authority consultee’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

204

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  leave out lines 10 to 14.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The Commission can only validate an application if the pre-application procedure has been

 

complied with. In doing so it has to have regard to representations on the adequacy of consultation

 

from local authorities (Clause 49(4)). The amendments require it to have regard to any

 

representations on the adequacy of consultation.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

205

 

Clause  49,  page  25,  line  17,  leave out ‘and 43’ and insert ‘, 43 and 44’.

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

The Commission considers whether the applicant has taken account of the responses to

 

consultation and publicity (Clause 49(3)(d)). The amendment extends the ‘adequacy-of-

 

consultation representation’ to include comments whether account has been taken of those

 

responses.

 


 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

15

 

Clause  50,  page  25,  line  29,  at end insert ‘and who must include persons consulted

 

under section 37(1)(a)’.


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 24 January 2008