House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

30

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

    

where x is the number of TEU that the facilities are capable of handling;

 

(b)    to the extent that the facilities are for ro-ro ships—

                y
          ________
          250, 000

where y is the number of units that the facilities are capable of handling;

 

(c)    to the extent that the facilities are for cargo ships of any other description—

                z
          ________
          5, 000, 000

where z is the number of tonnes of material that the facilities are capable

 

of handling.’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

Withdrawn  162

 

Clause  21,  page  11,  line  3,  at end add ‘but excludes tramways, and guided transport

 

as defined under subsections 81(2)(b) and 81(2)(c) of the Railways Act 1993’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  130

 

Clause  22,  page  11,  line  6,  leave out ‘will’ and insert ‘is expected to’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  131

 

Clause  22,  page  11,  line  7,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

The alteration of a rail freight interchange is within section 13(1)(i) only if—


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

31

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

following the alteration, each of the conditions in subsections (2)(a) and

 

(3) to (6) is expected to be met in relation to it, and

 

(b)    

the alteration is expected to have the effect specified in subsection (6A).’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  132

 

Clause  22,  page  11,  line  19,  at end insert—

 

‘(6A)    

The effect referred to in subsection (1A)(b) is to increase by at least 60 hectares

 

the area of the land on which the rail freight interchange is situated.’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  133

 

Clause  23,  page  11,  line  38,  leave out ‘exceeds’ and insert ‘is expected to exceed’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  134

 

Clause  23,  page  11,  line  39,  leave out ‘extension’ and insert ‘alteration’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  135

 

Clause  23,  page  11,  line  41,  leave out ‘extension’ and insert ‘alteration’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  136

 

Clause  23,  page  12,  line  2,  leave out ‘extension’ and insert ‘alteration’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  137

 

Clause  23,  page  12,  line  2,  leave out ‘exceeds’ and insert ‘is expected to exceed’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  138

 

Clause  24,  page  12,  line  12,  leave out ‘exceeds’ and insert ‘is expected to exceed’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  139

 

Clause  25,  page  12,  line  30,  leave out ‘will’ and insert ‘is expected to’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

32

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  140

 

Clause  25,  page  12,  line  30,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

The alteration of a waste water treatment plant is within section 13(1)(l) only if—

 

(a)    

the treatment plant is in England, and

 

(b)    

the effect of the alteration is expected to be to increase by more than a

 

population equivalent of 150,000 the capacity of the plant.’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  141

 

Clause  26,  page  13,  line  6,  leave out from ‘the’ to end of line 9 and insert ‘main

 

purpose of the facility is expected to be the final disposal or recovery of hazardous waste,

 

and

 

(c)    

the facility is expected to have the capacity specified in subsection (1A).

 

(1A)    

The capacity is—’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  142

 

Clause  26,  page  13,  line  12,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

The alteration of a hazardous waste facility is within section 13(1)(m) only if—

 

(a)    

the facility is in England,

 

(b)    

the main purpose of the facility is the final disposal or recovery of

 

hazardous waste, and

 

(c)    

the alteration is expected to have the effect specified in subsection (3B).

 

(3B)    

The effect is—

 

(a)    

in the case of the disposal of hazardous waste by landfill or in a deep

 

storage facility, to increase by more than 100,000 tonnes per year the

 

capacity of the facility;

 

(b)    

in any other case, to increase by more than 30,000 tonnes per year the

 

capacity of the facility.’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

Not selected  163

 

Page  13,  line  2,  leave out Clause 26.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 



 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

33

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

Withdrawn  255

 

Clause  27,  page  13,  line  24,  leave out ‘is required’ and insert ‘may be applied for’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Richard Benyon

 

James Duddridge

 

Mr David Curry

 

Not selected  416

 

Clause  27,  page  13,  line  25,  leave out ‘or forms part of’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  340

 

Clause  27,  page  13,  line  27,  leave out subsection (2).

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

Not called  256

 

Clause  27,  page  13,  line  30,  leave out ‘is required’ and insert ‘may be applied for’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Not called  9

 

Clause  27,  page  13,  line  32,  leave out ‘Commission’ and insert ‘High Court’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

Not called  164

 

Clause  27,  page  13,  line  32,  leave out ‘Commission’ and insert ‘Secretary of State

 

on the advice of the Commission.

 

‘(3)    

The Secretary of State must take a decision under subsection (2) within 28 days

 

of receiving the Commission’s advice.

 

(4)    

Nothing in this section shall compel the Secretary of State to comply with the

 

Commission’s advice.’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  143

 

Clause  28,  page  14,  line  1,  after ‘use’ insert ‘a cavity or’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

34

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  144

 

Clause  28,  page  14,  line  2,  after second ‘the’ insert ‘cavity or’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

Not called  257

 

Clause  29,  page  14,  line  30,  leave out ‘required’ and insert ‘obtained’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  341

 

Clause  29,  page  14,  leave out lines 34 to 37.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  342

 

Clause  29,  page  14,  leave out lines 47 and 48.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  343

 

Clause  29,  page  15,  line  4,  at end insert—

 

‘(ja)    

to the extent that the development relates to land in England, consent

 

under section 2(3) or 3 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological

 

Areas Act 1979;

 

(jb)    

to the extent that the development relates to land in England, notice under

 

section 35 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act

 

1979;’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  344

 

Clause  29,  page  15,  line  7,  at end insert—

 

‘(l)    

to the extent that the development relates to land in England, consent

 

under section 8(1), (2) or (3) of the Listed Buildings Act;

 

(m)    

to the extent that the development relates to land in England, consent

 

under section 74(1) of the Listed Buildings Act.’.

 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

Not called  258

 

Clause  29,  page  15,  line  8,  leave out ‘required’ and insert ‘obtained’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

35

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

Not called  259

 

Clause  29,  page  15,  line  9,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘is required to’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  345

 

Clause  29,  page  15,  leave out line 14.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  346

 

Clause  29,  page  15,  line  16,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

Subsection (2) is subject to section [Welsh offshore generating stations].’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  347

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  41,  after ‘one’ insert ‘or more’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  145

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  42,  leave out ‘mentioned in section 13(5)’ and insert

 

‘specified in subsection (1A)’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

Withdrawn  165

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  42,  at end insert ‘and’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  146

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  43,  leave out ‘England’ and insert ‘one or more of the

 

areas specified in subsection (1B)’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

Not called  239

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  43,  leave out from ‘England’ to end of line 44.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 22nd January 2008      

36

 

Planning Bill, continued

 
 

Mrs Jacqui Lait

 

Robert Neill

 

Mr David Jones

 

Mr Richard Benyon

 

Mr David Curry

 

James Duddridge

 

Not called  260

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  44,  leave out ‘project’ and insert ‘development’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  147

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  44,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

The fields are—

 

(a)    

energy;

 

(b)    

transport;

 

(c)    

water;

 

(d)    

waste water;

 

(e)    

waste.

 

(1B)    

The areas are—

 

(a)    

England;

 

(b)    

waters adjacent to England up to the seaward limits of the territorial sea;

 

(c)    

in the case of a project for the carrying out of works in the field of energy,

 

a Renewable Energy Zone, except any part of a Renewable Energy Zone

 

in relation to which the Scottish Ministers have functions.’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  348

 

Clause  30,  page  15,  line  45,  leave out subsection (2) and insert—

 

‘(2)    

The Secretary of State may direct—

 

(a)    

the application to be treated as an application for an order granting

 

development consent, and

 

(b)    

the development to which the application relates to be treated as

 

development for which development consent is required,

 

    

for specified purposes or generally.

 

(2A)    

A direction under subsection (2) may provide for specified provisions of or made

 

under this or any other Act—

 

(a)    

to have effect in relation to the application with any specified

 

modifications, or

 

(b)    

to be treated as having been complied with in relation to the application.

 

(2B)    

If the Secretary of State gives a direction under subsection (2), the relevant

 

authority must refer the application to the Commission instead of dealing with it

 

themselves.’.

 

Dan Rogerson

 

Tom Brake

 

Withdrawn  166

 

Clause  30,  page  16,  line  7,  leave out from ‘application’ to end of line 8 and insert

 

‘for a period of up to three months’.

 

John Healey

 

Agreed to  349

 

Clause  30,  page  16,  line  11,  after ‘decide’ insert—


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 23 January 2008