|
| |
|
| |
71 | Control orders: powers of entry and search |
| |
(1) | After section 7 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (c. 2) insert— |
| |
“7A | Powers of entry and search: absconding |
| |
(1) | If a constable reasonably suspects that the controlled person has |
| 5 |
absconded, the constable may enter (if necessary by force) and search |
| |
premises to which this section applies— |
| |
(a) | for the purpose of determining whether the person has |
| |
| |
(b) | if it appears that the person has absconded, for material that |
| 10 |
may assist in the pursuit and arrest of the controlled person. |
| |
(2) | The premises to which this section applies are— |
| |
(a) | the controlled person’s place of residence; |
| |
(b) | any other premises to which the controlled person is, or at any |
| |
time has been, required to grant access in accordance with an |
| 15 |
obligation imposed by or under a control order. |
| |
7B | Powers of entry and search: failure to grant access to premises |
| |
(1) | This section applies where a constable reasonably suspects that the |
| |
controlled person is not granting access to premises, as required by an |
| |
obligation imposed by or under the control order, at a time when the |
| 20 |
controlled person is required, by an obligation so imposed, to be at |
| |
| |
(2) | The constable may enter (if necessary by force) and search the |
| |
| |
(a) | for the purpose of determining whether any of the obligations |
| 25 |
imposed by or under the control order have been contravened; |
| |
(b) | if it appears that an obligation has been contravened, for |
| |
material that may assist in the investigation of the |
| |
| |
7C | Powers of entry and search: monitoring compliance with order |
| 30 |
(1) | A constable may apply for the issue of a warrant under this section for |
| |
the purposes of determining whether the controlled person is |
| |
complying with the obligations imposed by or under a control order. |
| |
(2) | The application must be made— |
| |
(a) | in England and Wales, to a justice of the peace; |
| 35 |
(b) | in Scotland, to the sheriff; |
| |
(c) | in Northern Ireland, to a lay magistrate. |
| |
(3) | A warrant under this section shall authorise any constable to enter (if |
| |
necessary by force) and search premises to which this section applies |
| |
that are specified in the warrant. |
| 40 |
(4) | The premises to which this section applies are— |
| |
(a) | the controlled person’s place of residence; |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(b) | any other premises to which the controlled person is, or at any |
| |
time has been, required to grant access in accordance with an |
| |
obligation imposed by or under a control order. |
| |
(5) | An application under this section may only be granted if the justice of |
| |
the peace, the sheriff or the lay magistrate is satisfied that the issue of |
| 5 |
the warrant is necessary for the purposes of determining whether the |
| |
controlled person is complying with the obligations imposed by or |
| |
under the control order.”. |
| |
(2) | In section 9 of that Act (offences)— |
| |
(a) | after subsection (3) insert— |
| 10 |
“(3A) | A person who intentionally obstructs the exercise by a constable |
| |
of a power conferred by section 7A or 7B or by a warrant under |
| |
section 7C commits an offence.”; |
| |
(b) | in subsection (7) after “subsection (3)” insert “or (3A)”. |
| |
(3) | These amendments have effect as from the commencement of this section and |
| 15 |
apply regardless of when the control order was made. |
| |
72 | Control orders: meaning of involvement in terrorism-related activity |
| |
(1) | In section 1(9) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (c. 2) (meaning of |
| |
involvement in terrorism-related activity), in paragraph (d), for “to be involved |
| |
in terrorism-related activity” substitute “by the individual concerned to be |
| 20 |
involved in conduct falling within paragraphs (a) to (c)”. |
| |
(2) | This amendment shall be deemed always to have had effect. |
| |
73 | Time allowed for representations by controlled person |
| |
(1) | Section 3 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (supervision by court of |
| |
making of non-derogating control orders) is amended as follows. |
| 25 |
(2) | In subsection (7) (opportunity for individual to make representations about |
| |
directions given by the court), omit “within 7 days of the court’s giving |
| |
permission or (as the case may be) making its determination on the reference”. |
| |
(3) | After that subsection insert— |
| |
“(7A) | The individual must be given the opportunity to make those |
| 30 |
| |
(a) | in the case of directions under subsection (2)(c), within 7 days of |
| |
notice of the terms of the control order being delivered to the |
| |
individual in accordance with section 7(8); |
| |
(b) | in the case of directions given under subsection (6)(b) or (c), |
| 35 |
within 7 days of the court making its determination on the |
| |
| |
(4) | These amendments apply in relation to control orders made after this section |
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
74 | Application for anonymity for controlled person |
| |
(1) | In the Schedule to the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (c. 2) (control order |
| |
proceedings etc), paragraph 5 (application for anonymity for controlled |
| |
person) is amended as follows. |
| |
(2) | In sub-paragraph (1)(a) omit “, at any time after a control order has been |
| 5 |
| |
(3) | After sub-paragraph (3) insert— |
| |
“(4) | In relation to a time before the control order has been made |
| |
references in this paragraph to “the controlled person” shall be read |
| |
as references to the person in respect of whom the Secretary of State |
| 10 |
has made an application to the court for (as the case may be)— |
| |
(a) | permission to make a non-derogating control order under |
| |
| |
(b) | the making of a derogating control order under section 4(1).”. |
| |
(4) | These amendments shall be deemed always to have had effect. |
| 15 |
Forfeiture of terrorist cash |
| |
75 | Forfeiture of terrorist cash: determination of period for which cash may be |
| |
| |
(1) | Schedule 1 to the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (c. 24) (forfeiture |
| |
of terrorist cash) is amended as follows. |
| 20 |
(2) | In paragraph 3 (detention of seized cash), after sub-paragraph (1) (which |
| |
specifies the period for which cash seized may initially be detained) insert— |
| |
“(1A) | In determining the period of 48 hours specified in sub-paragraph (1) |
| |
there shall be disregarded— |
| |
(a) | any Saturday or Sunday; |
| 25 |
| |
| |
(d) | any day that is a bank holiday under the Banking and |
| |
Financial Dealings Act 1971 in the part of the United |
| |
Kingdom in which the cash is seized; |
| 30 |
(e) | any day prescribed under section 8(2) of the Criminal |
| |
Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 as a court holiday in the sheriff |
| |
court district in which the cash is seized.”. |
| |
(3) | In paragraphs 4(1) and 10(2) (which refer to the period specified in paragraph |
| |
3(1)), after “48 hours” insert “(determined in accordance with paragraph |
| 35 |
| |
(4) | The amendments in this section apply in relation to cash seized after this |
| |
section comes into force. |
| |
76 | Forfeiture of terrorist cash: appeal against decision in forfeiture proceedings |
| |
(1) | In Schedule 1 to the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (forfeiture of |
| 40 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
terrorist cash), for paragraph 7 (appeal against forfeiture) substitute— |
| |
“Appeal against decision in forfeiture proceedings |
| |
7 (1) | A party to proceedings for an order under paragraph 6 (“a forfeiture |
| |
order”) who is aggrieved by a forfeiture order made in the |
| |
proceedings or by the decision of the court or sheriff not to make a |
| 5 |
forfeiture order may appeal— |
| |
(a) | in England and Wales, to the Crown Court; |
| |
(b) | in Scotland, to the sheriff principal; |
| |
(c) | in Northern Ireland, to a county court. |
| |
(2) | The appeal must be brought before the end of the period of 30 days |
| 10 |
beginning with the date on which the order is made or, as the case |
| |
may be, the decision is given. |
| |
| This is subject to paragraph 7A (extended time for appealing in |
| |
certain cases of deproscription). |
| |
(3) | The court or sheriff principal hearing the appeal may make any order |
| 15 |
that appears to the court or sheriff principal to be appropriate. |
| |
(4) | If an appeal against a forfeiture order is upheld, the court or sheriff |
| |
principal may order the release of the cash. |
| |
Extended time for appealing in certain cases where deproscription order made |
| |
7A (1) | This paragraph applies where— |
| 20 |
(a) | a successful application for a forfeiture order relies (wholly or |
| |
partly) on the fact that an organisation is proscribed, |
| |
(b) | an application under section 4 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for a |
| |
deproscription order in respect of the organisation is refused |
| |
by the Secretary of State, |
| 25 |
(c) | the forfeited cash is seized under this Schedule on or after the |
| |
date of the refusal of that application, |
| |
(d) | an appeal against that refusal is allowed under section 5 of |
| |
| |
(e) | a deproscription order is made accordingly, and |
| 30 |
(f) | if the order is made in reliance on section 123(5) of that Act, a |
| |
resolution is passed by each House of Parliament under |
| |
| |
(2) | Where this paragraph applies, an appeal under paragraph 7 above |
| |
against the forfeiture order may be brought at any time before the |
| 35 |
end of the period of 30 days beginning with the date on which the |
| |
deproscription order comes into force. |
| |
(3) | In this paragraph a “deproscription order” means an order under |
| |
section 3(3)(b) or (8) of the Terrorism Act 2000.”. |
| |
(2) | This amendment applies where the order or decision of the court or sheriff |
| 40 |
against which the appeal is brought is made or given after this section comes |
| |
| |
|
| |
|