House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

17

 

House of Commons

 
 

Thursday 8th May 2008

 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill


 

[ninth and tenth Sittings]


 

Mr Tony McNulty

 

That the Order of the Committee [22nd April 2008] be amended as follows:In

 

paragraph (1)(e) leave out ‘1.00 p.m.’ and insert ‘2.00 p.m.’.

 

Agreed to

 


 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Withdrawn  90

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  21,  leave out subsection (2) and insert—

 

‘(2)    

Subject to subsections (3) to (6), a constable may question a person about a

 

related terrorism offence where the person has already been charged with, or been

 

officially informed that they may be prosecuted for, a terrorism offence.’.

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  125

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  21,  leave out subsection (2) and insert—

 

‘(2A)    

Subject to subsections (2B) to (2E) a constable may question a person about a

 

related terrorism offence where the person has already been charged with, or been

 

officially informed that they may be prosecuted for, a terrorism offence.

 

(2B)    

A police officer of at least the rank of superintendent may make an application to

 

a judge of the High Court for permission to allow a constable to question a person

 

under subsection (2), if the police officer reasonably believes that the person may

 

be charged with a related terrorism offence.

 

(2C)    

A judge may grant permission for further questioning under subsection (2) only

 

if satisfied by evidence that:

 

(a)    

there are reasonable grounds for believing that the original charge was

 

appropriate to bring; and

 

(b)    

it is in the interests of justice to allow further questioning in the

 

circumstances.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 8th May 2008            

18

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

(2D)    

Where a judge grants permission for further questioning under subsection (2C) he

 

shall make such directions as he considers appropriate with regard to:

 

(a)    

the maximum permitted period for further questioning;

 

(b)    

the total length of time over which further questioning is permitted; or

 

(c)    

any other directions as required in the interests of justice.

 

(2E)    

A related terrorism offence means a terrorism offence arising in whole or in part

 

from the same set of facts as the offence with which the person has already been

 

charged, or officially informed that they may be prosecuted.’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Withdrawn  14

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  25,  after ‘offence’, insert ‘, at any time up to the

 

commencement of the trial,’.

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Not called  91

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  26,  after ‘a’, insert ‘related’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not selected  15

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  26,  leave out ‘or’ and insert ‘and’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not called  17

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘(iii)    

has, after satisfying himself that the original charge was

 

appropriate and that further questioning would be in the interests

 

of justice, given authority for the constable to question the

 

person.’.

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  92

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

A police officer of at least the rank of superintendent may make an application to

 

a judge of the High Court for permission to allow a constable to question a person

 

under subsections (2) and (3) above if the police officer believes that the person

 

may be charged with a related terrorism offence.

 

(3B)    

A judge may grant permission for further questioning under subsection (2) and

 

(3) only if he is satisfied by evidence that—

 

(a)    

there are reasonable grounds for believing that the original charge was

 

appropriate to bring;

 

(b)    

it is in the interests of justice to allow further questioning in the

 

circumstances; and

 

(c)    

that further questioning would not be oppressive.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 8th May 2008            

19

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

(3C)    

Where a judge grants permission for further questioning under subsection (3B) he

 

shall make such directions as he considers appropriate with regard to—

 

(a)    

the maximum permitted period for further questioning;

 

(b)    

the total length of time over which further questioning is permitted; or

 

(c)    

any other directions in the interests of justice,

 

    

and these directions shall be subject to variation on application by either party to

 

the same court.

 

(3D)    

A “related terrorism offence” means a terrorism offence arising in whole or in

 

part from the same set of facts as the offence with which the person has already

 

been charged, or officially informed that they may be prosecuted.’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Agreed to  16

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  34,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘must’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  18

 

Clause  23,  page  16,  line  35,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

Codes of practice made under subsection (4) must include provision for—

 

(a)    

questioning to take place only in the presence of a lawyer representing

 

the interests of the accused person;

 

(b)    

a transcript to be made available to the judge authorising the questioning

 

under subsection (3);

 

(c)    

the questioning to be subject to a video recording;

 

(d)    

for the purpose of the questioning to be confined to questioning about

 

new evidence which has become available since the accused person was

 

charged; and

 

(e)    

preventing oppressive questioning by specifying appropriate time limits.

 

(4B)    

Prior to the commencement of the trial the judge must review any transcripts

 

made available to him under subsection (4A)(b) having regard to subsections

 

(4A)(d) and (e).’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Withdrawn  19

 

Clause  23,  page  17,  line  2,  leave out subsections (6) and (7).

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 

Clause 24 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Not called  93

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  29,  after second ‘a’, insert ‘related’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 8th May 2008            

20

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Not called  97

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  29,  leave out subsection (2) and insert—

 

‘(2)    

Subject to subsections (3) to (6), a constable may question a person about a

 

related terrorism offence where the person has already been charged with, or been

 

officially informed that they may be prosecuted for, a terrorism offence.’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not called  21

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  32,  at end insert ‘, at any time up to the commencement of

 

the trial,’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not called  22

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  32,  at end insert ‘, and

 

(c)    

a judge of the Crown Court has, after satisfying himself that the original

 

charge was appropriate and that further questioning would be in the

 

interests of justice, given authority for the constable to question the

 

person.’.

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  98

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

A police officer of at least the rank of superintendent may make an application to

 

a judge of the High Court for permission to allow a constable to question a person

 

under subsection (2) above if the police officer believes that the person may be

 

charged with a related terrorism offence.

 

(2B)    

A judge may grant permission for further questioning under subsection (2) only

 

if he is satisfied by evidence that—

 

(a)    

there are reasonable grounds for believing that the original charge was

 

appropriate to bring;

 

(b)    

it is in the interests of justice to allow further questioning in the

 

circumstances; and

 

(c)    

that further questioning would not be oppressive.

 

(2C)    

Where a judge grants permission for further questioning under subsection (2B) he

 

shall make such directions as he considers appropriate with regard to—

 

(a)    

the maximum permitted period for further questioning;

 

(b)    

the total length of time over which further questioning is permitted; or

 

(c)    

any other directions in the interests of justice,

 

    

and these directions shall be subject to variation on application by either party to

 

the same court.

 

(2D)    

A “related terrorism offence” means a terrorism offence arising in whole or in

 

part from the same set of facts as the offencfe with which the person has already

 

been charged, or officially informed that they may be prosecuted.’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 8th May 2008            

21

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Agreed to  23

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  34,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘must’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not called  24

 

Clause  25,  page  17,  line  36,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

Codes of practice made under subsection (3) must include provision for—

 

(a)    

questioning to take place only in the presence of a lawyer representing

 

the interests of the accused person;

 

(b)    

a transcript to be made available to the judge authorising the questioning

 

under subsection (3);

 

(c)    

the questioning to be subject to a video recording;

 

(d)    

for the purpose of the questioning to be confined to questioning about

 

new evidence which has become available since the accused person was

 

charged; and

 

(e)    

preventing oppressive questioning by specifying appropriate time limits.

 

(3B)    

Prior to the commencement of the trial the judge must review any transcripts

 

made available to him under subsection (3A)(b) having regard to subsections

 

(3A)(d) and (e).’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not called  25

 

Clause  25,  page  18,  line  1,  leave out subsections (5) and (6).

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tony McNulty

 

Agreed to  135

 

Clause  26,  page  18,  line  38,  leave out from ‘things)’ to end of line 39.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Withdrawn  26

 

Clause  26,  page  19,  line  11,  at end insert—

 

(e)    

the common law offences of murder, manslaughter, culpable homicide,

 

kidnapping or abduction, in relation to an offence listed in subsection (1)

 

above.’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 



 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 8th May 2008            

22

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Withdrawn  166

 

Clause  27,  page  20,  line  17,  leave out subsection (4).

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Not called  168

 

Clause  27,  page  20,  line  18,  leave out subsection (5).

 

Mr Tony McNulty

 

Agreed to  136

 

Clause  27,  page  20,  line  18,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

The power conferred by subsection (4) may be exercised so as to add offences to

 

subsection (2) or (3) only if it appears to the Secretary of State necessary to do so

 

for the purpose of dealing with terrorism.’.

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Not called  167

 

Clause  27,  page  20,  line  19,  leave out subsection (6).

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Not called  126

 

Clause  27,  page  20,  line  19,  after ‘offence’, insert ‘with terrorism connections’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Withdrawn  50

 

Clause  27,  page  20,  line  20,  at end add—

 

‘(7)    

Where this section applies to an offence committed in Scotland, proceedings may

 

only be taken in another part of the United Kingdom following consultation with,

 

and with the consent of, the Lord Advocate.’.

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 

Clause 28 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tony McNulty

 

Agreed to  76

 

Clause  29,  page  20,  line  32,  after ‘If’ insert ‘having regard to the material before it

 

for the purposes of sentencing’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  27

 

Clause  29,  page  20,  line  33,  leave out ‘court’ and insert ‘jury’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee Proceedings: 8th May 2008            

23

 

Counter-Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  128

 

Clause  29,  page  20,  line  34,  after ‘and’, insert ‘the jury’.

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

Not called  129

 

Clause  29,  page  20,  line  37,  leave out first ‘court’ and insert ‘jury’.

 

Tom Brake

 

Mr David Heath

 

Not called  28

 

Clause  29,  page  20,  line  37,  leave out ‘determines’ and insert ‘is satisfied beyond

 

reasonable doubt’.

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Not moved  169

 

Clause  29,  page  20,  line  40,  leave out subsection (5).

 

Clause, as amended, Agreed to.

 

Clauses 30 and 31 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tony McNulty

 

Agreed to  137

 

Schedule  2,  page  71,  line  33,  leave out paragraph (b).

 

Schedule, as amended, Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Withdrawn  170

 

Clause  32,  page  22,  line  1,  leave out from ‘used’ to ‘for’ in line 2.

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Not called  130

 

Clause  32,  page  22,  line  5,  leave out ‘or under their control’.

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

Not called  171

 

Clause  32,  page  22,  line  8,  leave out ‘or had reasonable cause to suspect’.


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 9 May 2008