House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

78

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

89

 

Clause  13,  page  14,  leave out lines 23 to 25.

 


 

Stephen Hammond

 

42

 

Clause  14,  page  14,  line  36,  leave out subsection (2).

 


 

Stephen Hammond

 

43

 

Clause  15,  page  15,  line  3,  leave out subsection (3).

 


 

Stephen Hammond

 

44

 

Clause  18,  page  16,  line  39,  leave out paragraph (a).

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

90

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  2,  leave out from ‘revised’ to end of line 3.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

45

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  8,  leave out paragraph (e).

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

91

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  leave out lines 8 to 12.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

94

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  9,  at end insert ‘on the basis that an “admissible objection”

 

will be restricted to matters dealing with the undermining of the commercial viability of

 

existing local services being operated in any part of the area to which the scheme would

 

relate,’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

79

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

95

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  10,  at end insert ‘, provided that such provision specifies

 

that the meaning of “relevant operator” shall not include any person who does not operate

 

local services within any part of the area to which the scheme would relate,’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

92

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  11,  after ‘determination’, insert ‘by the authority or

 

authorities’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

93

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  12,  at end insert—

 

‘(f)    

to the extent that such a determination is to be made by a person other

 

than the authority or authorities, for the notification of the authority or

 

authorities that an objector has purported to make an admissible

 

objection and for the authority or authorities to make representations

 

regarding that objection to the person making the determination,’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

46

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  16,  leave out paragraph (b).

 

Ms Rosie Winterton

 

81

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

The provision that may be made by virtue of subsection (3)(g) includes provision

 

for and in connection with—

 

(a)    

the appointment of a person (“an adjudicator”) to make such a

 

determination as is mentioned in that paragraph;

 

(b)    

the appointment of a person (“an assessor”) to assist an adjudicator in

 

considering any question which appears to arise in relation to such a

 

determination;

 

(c)    

the payment—

 

(i)    

by the Secretary of State to an adjudicator, or

 

(ii)    

by the Secretary of State or an adjudicator to an assessor,

 

    

of such remuneration as may be determined by or in accordance with the

 

regulations.’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

80

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

154

 

Clause  18,  page  17,  line  32,  at end add—

 

‘(6)    

A statutory instrument containing regulations made under this section may not be

 

made unless a draft of the order has been laid before, and approved by a resolution

 

of, each House of Parliament.’.

 


 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

96

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  40,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

47

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  40,  after ‘increase’, insert ‘of 10%’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

97

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  41,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

98

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  43,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

99

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  44,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

48

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  44,  after ‘relates’, insert ‘, which are substantially greater

 

than those that would pertain under a quality partnership scheme,’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

100

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  46,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

49

 

Clause  19,  page  17,  line  47,  after ‘authorities’, insert ‘substantially more than


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

81

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

would a quality partnership scheme’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

101

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  1,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

155

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  2,  after ‘efficient’, insert ‘, environmentally sustainable’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

50

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  4,  leave out from beginning to end of line 8 and insert—

 

‘(e)    

there are shown to be no adverse effects of the proposed scheme on

 

operators or on persons living or working in the area to which the

 

proposed scheme relates.’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

102

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  4,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

103

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  6,  leave out ‘proposed’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

51

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  8,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

In subsection (1)—

 

“economic” means that the cost of implementing the proposed scheme to

 

the local authority will be no greater than implementing the same services

 

under any other means;

 

“efficient” means that the proposed scheme will be no less efficient than if

 

the same services were implemented under any other means;

 

“effective” means that the proposed scheme will be no less effective than if

 

the same services were implemented under any other means.’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

104

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  9,  leave out subsection (3) and insert—

 

‘(3)    

In subsection (2) omit paragraph (b).’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

82

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

194

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  9,  leave out subsection (3) and insert—

 

‘(3)    

For subsection (2)(b) substitute—

 

“(b)    

have consulted the appropriate consulting authority in

 

accordance with section 125A”’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

52

 

Clause  19,  page  18,  line  19,  after ‘services’, insert ‘by 10%’.

 


 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

105

 

Clause  20,  page  18,  line  24,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

For “proposed scheme”, wherever occurring, substitute “scheme”’.

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

106

 

Clause  20,  page  18,  leave out lines 25 to 27 and insert—

 

‘(2)    

For subsection (1) substitute—

 

“(1)    

Prior to making a quality contracts scheme the authority or authorities

 

must—”’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

53

 

Clause  20,  page  18,  line  28,  leave out from ‘publish’ to ‘a’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

54

 

Clause  20,  page  18,  line  31,  leave out ‘and’ and at end insert—

 

‘( )    

supply a copy of that document to—

 

(i)    

the chief fire officer for each fire area covering the whole or part

 

of that area,

 

(ii)    

the head of the local ambulance service for each area covering

 

the whole or part of that area,

 

(iii)    

all persons living within 150 metres of any part of the route as

 

specified in the proposed scheme,

 

(iv)    

representatives of local groups representing disabled people,’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

55

 

Clause  20,  page  18,  line  39,  leave out ‘reasons’ and insert ‘evidence indicating’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

83

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

Stephen Hammond

 

56

 

Clause  20,  page  19,  line  7,  at end insert—

 

‘(iii)    

any potential liability arising from future litigation,’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

57

 

Clause  20,  page  19,  line  16,  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

an outline of the evidence of why the proposed scheme will provide a

 

substantial improvement to the relevant service or services in comparison

 

to the current service or services or the service or services that could be

 

provided under a quality partnership scheme.’.

 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

146

 

Clause  20,  page  19,  line  21,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

In subsection (3) after paragraph (f) insert—

 

“(g)    

either operators of rail services which are provided within the authority’s

 

area or organisations appearing to the authority to be representative of

 

such operators,

 

(h)    

any relevant rail infrastructure manager, and”.’.

 


 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

107

 

Clause  21,  page  19,  line  29,  leave out ‘amended as follows’ and insert ‘omitted’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

58

 

Clause  21,  page  19,  line  36,  leave out from ‘England’ to end of line 39 and insert

 

‘and Wales, an approvals board for England and Wales.’.

 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

195

 

Page  19,  line  28,  leave Clause 21.

 


 

Stephen Hammond

 

59

 

Clause  22,  page  20,  line  3,  after ‘England’, insert ‘and Wales’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

60

 

Clause  22,  page  20,  line  4,  leave out ‘for England’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 22nd April 2008                  

84

 

Local Transport Bill [Lords] continued

 
 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

156

 

Clause  22,  page  20,  line  9,  at end insert ‘, one of whom shall be a representative of

 

users of local transport.’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

61

 

Clause  22,  page  20,  line  31,  leave out subsection (8).

 

Stephen Hammond

 

62

 

Clause  22,  page  20,  line  33,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

The Secretary of State shall at all times keep a panel of persons who may be

 

appointed under subsection 2(b).

 

( )    

The panel shall consist of at least 15 persons.

 

( )    

Membership of the panel shall be open to any person who is considered to have

 

relevant experience of the bus industry, passenger user groups or local transport

 

governance.

 

( )    

The persons who are to be appointed under subsection 2(b) are those that the

 

Secretary of State considers most appropriate in all the circumstances of the

 

particular case.’.

 

Ms Rosie Winterton

 

2

 

Clause  22,  page  20,  line  38,  leave out subsection (2).

 

Graham Stringer

 

Ian Stewart

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

108

 

Page  20,  line  1,  leave out Clause 22.

 


 

Stephen Hammond

 

63

 

Clause  23,  page  21,  line  3,  after ‘England’, insert ‘Wales’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

64

 

Clause  23,  page  21,  line  6,  leave out ‘for England’.

 

Stephen Hammond

 

65

 

Clause  23,  page  21,  line  9,  leave out from ‘The’ to end of line 10 and insert

 

‘regulations of the board shall include—’.

 

Norman Baker

 

Mr John Leech

 

157

 

Clause  23,  page  21,  line  11,  leave out ‘approval’ and insert ‘consideration’.


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 22 April 2008