House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

<


 
 

 

LORDS amendments to the

Counter-Terrorism Bill

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 65, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

Clause 1

1

Page 2, line 19, leave out subsection (4) and insert—

 

“( )    

A constable has the same powers of seizure in relation to a document

 

removed under this section as the constable would have if it had not been

 

removed (and if anything discovered on examination after removal had

 

been discovered without it having been removed).”

Before Clause 14

2

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“National guidelines on fingerprint and sample database

 

(1)    

The Secretary of State shall by regulations publish national guidelines for

 

governmental agencies establishing—

 

(a)    

a procedure by which a person can request a statement of what

 

information relating to fingerprints and samples is held on them or

 

on a dependent;

 

(b)    

a procedure by which a person can request that such information

 

held on them or a dependent is destroyed;

 

(c)    

the circumstances in which a request under paragraph (b) may be

 

refused.

 

(2)    

If a request made under subsection (1)(b) is refused under subsection (1)(c),

 

the relevant agency shall write to the person setting out why such

 

information will not be destroyed and when such circumstances as prevent

 

it being destroyed may no longer apply.

 

(3)    

In drawing up guidelines under subsection (1), the Secretary of State shall

 

consult such bodies as he thinks appropriate.

 
 
Bill 16854/3

 
 

2

 
 

(4)    

Regulations under subsection (1) shall not be made until a draft copy is laid

 

before, and approved by resolution of, both Houses of Parliament.”

Before Clause 22

3

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“No extension of pre-charge detention

 

For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Act allows the Secretary of State

 

to extend the maximum period of pre-charge detention beyond 28 days.”

Clause 22

4

Leave out Clause 22

Clause 23

5

Leave out Clause 23

Clause 24

6

Leave out Clause 24

Clause 25

7

Leave out Clause 25

Clause 26

8

Leave out Clause 26

Clause 27

9

Leave out Clause 27

Clause 28

10

Leave out Clause 28

Clause 29

11

Leave out Clause 29

Clause 30

12

Leave out Clause 30

Clause 31

13

Leave out Clause 31


 
 

3

 

Clause 32

14

Leave out Clause 32

Clause 33

15

Leave out Clause 33

Clause 34

16

Page 22, line 35, leave out subsections (2) to (5) and insert—

 

“( )    

A judge of the Crown Court may authorise the questioning of a person

 

about an offence—

 

(a)    

after the person has been charged with the offence or been officially

 

informed that they may be prosecuted for it, or

 

(b)    

after the person has been sent for trial for the offence,

 

    

if the offence is a terrorism offence or it appears to the judge that the offence

 

has a terrorist connection.

 

( )    

The judge—

 

(a)    

must specify the period during which questioning is authorised,

 

and

 

(b)    

may impose such conditions as appear to be necessary in the

 

interests of justice, which may include conditions as to the place

 

where the questioning is to be carried out.

 

( )    

The period during which questioning is authorised—

 

(a)    

begins when questioning pursuant to the authorisation begins and

 

runs continuously from that time (whether or not questioning

 

continues), and

 

(b)    

must not exceed 48 hours.

 

    

This is without prejudice to any application for a further authorisation

 

under this section.

 

( )    

Where the person is in prison or otherwise lawfully detained, the judge

 

may authorise the person’s removal to another place and detention there

 

for the purpose of being questioned.

 

( )    

A judge must not authorise the questioning of a person under this section

 

unless satisfied—

 

(a)    

that further questioning of the person is necessary in the interests of

 

justice,

 

(b)    

that the investigation for the purposes of which the further

 

questioning is proposed is being conducted diligently and

 

expeditiously, and

 

(c)    

that what is authorised will not interfere unduly with the

 

preparation of the person’s defence to the charge in question or any

 

other criminal charge.”

Clause 35

17

Page 23, line 44, leave out subsections (2) to (6) and insert—

 

“( )    

On the application of the prosecutor, a sheriff may authorise the

 

questioning of a person about an offence—


 
 

4

 
 

(a)    

after the person has been charged with the offence, or

 

(b)    

after the person has appeared on petition in respect of the offence,

 

    

if the offence is a terrorism offence or it appears to the sheriff that the

 

offence has a terrorist connection.

 

( )    

The sheriff—

 

(a)    

must specify the period during which questioning is authorised,

 

and

 

(b)    

may impose such conditions as appear to be necessary in the

 

interests of justice, which may include conditions as to the place

 

where the questioning is to be carried out.

 

( )    

The period during which questioning is authorised—

 

(a)    

begins when questioning pursuant to the authorisation begins and

 

runs continuously from that time (whether or not questioning

 

continues), and

 

(b)    

must not exceed 48 hours.

 

    

This is without prejudice to any application for a further authorisation

 

under this section.

 

( )    

Where the person is in prison or otherwise lawfully detained, the sheriff

 

may authorise the person’s removal to another place and detention there

 

for the purpose of being questioned.

 

( )    

A sheriff must not authorise the questioning of a person under this section

 

unless satisfied—

 

(a)    

that further questioning of the person is necessary in the interests of

 

justice,

 

(b)    

that the investigation for the purposes of which the further

 

questioning is proposed is being conducted diligently and

 

expeditiously, and

 

(c)    

that what is authorised will not interfere unduly with the

 

preparation of the person’s defence to the charge in question or any

 

other criminal charge.”

18

Page 24, line 24, leave out “subsection (2) or (3)” and insert “this section”

19

Page 24, line 25, at end insert “(or had appeared on petition)”

Clause 36

20

Page 24, line 29, leave out subsections (2) to (4) and insert—

 

“( )    

A district judge (magistrates’ courts) may authorise the questioning of a

 

person about an offence—

 

(a)    

after the person has been charged with the offence or been officially

 

informed that they may be prosecuted for it, or

 

(b)    

after the person has been committed for trial for the offence,

 

    

if the offence is a terrorism offence.

 

( )    

The judge—

 

(a)    

must specify the period during which questioning is authorised,

 

and

 

(b)    

may impose such conditions as appear to the judge to be necessary

 

in the interests of justice, which may include conditions as to the

 

place where the questioning is to be carried out.


 
 

5

 
 

( )    

The period during which questioning is authorised—

 

(a)    

begins when questioning pursuant to the authorisation begins and

 

runs continuously from that time (whether or not questioning

 

continues), and

 

(b)    

must not exceed 48 hours.

 

    

This is without prejudice to any application for a further authorisation

 

under this section.

 

( )    

Where the person is in prison or otherwise lawfully detained, the judge

 

may authorise the person’s removal to another place and detention there

 

for the purpose of being questioned.

 

( )    

A distict judge (magistrates’ courts) must not authorise the questioning of

 

a person under this section unless satisfied—

 

(a)    

that further questioning of the person is necessary in the interests of

 

justice,

 

(b)    

that the investigation for the purposes of which the further

 

questioning is proposed is being conducted diligently and

 

expeditiously, and

 

(c)    

that what is authorised will not interfere unduly with the

 

preparation of the person’s defence to the charge in question or any

 

other criminal charge.”

21

Page 25, line 14, leave out “sent” and insert “committed”

Clause 37

22

Page 25, leave out line 30

23

Page 25, line 37, leave out “An order or” and insert “A”

24

Page 25, line 42, leave out subsection (6)

Clause 39

25

Page 27, line 14, leave out subsection (2) and insert—

 

“(2)    

Any ancillary offence in relation to an offence listed in subsection (1) is a

 

terrorism offence for the purposes of sections 34 to 36.”

26

Page 27, line 22, leave out “or (2)”

Clause 40

27

Page 28, line 17, leave out subsection (3)

28

Page 28, line 25, leave out “or (3)”

29

Page 28, line 28, leave out “or (3)”

After Clause 43

30

Insert the following new Clause—


 
 

6

 
 

“Sentences for offences with a terrorist connection: armed forces

 

(1)    

This section applies where a service court is considering for the purposes

 

of sentence the seriousness of a service offence as respects which the

 

corresponding civil offence is an offence specified in Schedule 3.

 

(2)    

If having regard to the material before it for the purposes of sentencing it

 

appears to the court that the offence has or may have a terrorist connection,

 

the court must determine whether that is the case.

 

(3)    

For that purpose the court may hear evidence, and must take account of

 

any representations made by the prosecution and the defence, as in the case

 

of any other matter relevant for the purposes of sentence.

 

(4)    

If the court determines that the offence has a terrorist connection, the

 

court—

 

(a)    

must treat that fact as an aggravating factor, and

 

(b)    

must state in open court that the offence was so aggravated.

 

(5)    

This section has effect in relation only to offences committed on or after the

 

day it comes into force.”

Clause 46

31

Page 31, leave out lines 33 to 40 and insert—

 

“(3)    

This section applies to any ancillary offence (as defined in section

 

(Meaning of “ancillary offence”) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008)

 

in relation to an offence listed in subsection (2).”

32

Page 32, line 3, leave out “or (3)”

33

Page 32, line 3, at end insert—

 

“(6)    

An order adding an offence to subsection (2) applies only in relation

 

to offences committed after the order comes into force.”.”

Clause 51

34

Page 36, line 35, at end insert—

 

“(3)    

Schedule (Notification requirements: application to service offences) provides

 

for the application of this Part to service offences and related matters.”

Clause 52

35

Page 37, line 27, leave out subsection (2) and insert—

 

“(2)    

This Part also applies to any ancillary offence in relation to an offence listed

 

in subsection (1).”

36

Page 37, line 35, leave out “or (2)”

37

Page 37, line 41, leave out subsection (7) and insert—

 

“(7)    

Where an offence is removed from the list, a person subject to the

 

notification requirements by reason of that offence being listed (and who is

 

not otherwise subject to those requirements) ceases to be subject to them

 

when the order comes into force.”


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 18 November 2008