Previous Section Index Home Page

21 Nov 2007 : Column 873W—continued


Arm’s Length Management Organisations: Standards

Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when each local authority with arms-length management organisations (ALMOs) expects to meet the decent homes standard; and when each expected to meet the standard when the ALMO was established. [162012]

Mr. Iain Wright: The following table sets out when each ALMO met the standard or now expects to meet the standard. Since being established a number of ALMOs have not made the progress that they expected and consequently will not now meet the decent homes standard by 2010. For those organisations yet to pass inspection—a pre-determined milestone to be achieved before investment can be spent—a date cannot be confirmed until inspection has been passed. We are now negotiating individual time scales to allow those ALMOs to deliver decent homes beyond 2010 where they are starting late on the programme, or where additional time is needed to deliver investment programmes that ensure value for money, deliver mixed communities and the right balance of refurbishment and new build.


21 Nov 2007 : Column 874W

21 Nov 2007 : Column 875W
Authority with arm s length management organisation Date met standard or expecting to meet standard

Rounds 1-5 ALMOs with investment programmes

Ashfield

2005-06

Derby

2005-06

Brent

2006-07

Westminster

2006-07

Blyth Valley

2006-07

Bolton

2007-08

Hillingdon

2007-08

Colchester

2007-08

Oldham

2007-08

Warrington

2007-08

Kirklees

2008-09

Leeds—South

2008-09

Carrick

2008-09

Cheltenham

2008-09

Kensington and Chelsea

2008-09

Rochdale

2008-09

Hammersmith and Fulham

2009-10

South Lakeland

2009-10

Poole

2009-10

Leeds—ENE (formerly East)

2009-10

Newark and Sherwood

2009-10

Islington

2010-11

Rotherham

2010-11

(Leeds—North East)

2010-11

Leeds WNW (formerly NW)

2010-11

(Leeds—West)

2010-11

Wigan

2010-11

Barnsley

2010-11

Leeds—South East

2010-11

Barnet

2010-11

Stockport

2010-11

High Peak

2010-11

Sheffield

2010-11

Ealing

2010-11

Manchester

2010-11

Newham

2010-11

Bury

2010-11

Stockton

2010-11

Newcastle

2010-11

Gateshead

2010-11

Hounslow

2010-11

Sandwell

2010-11

Solihull

2011-12

ALMOs who have passed their Audit Commission inspections later than originally planned

Waltham Forest

2010-11

Gloucester

2011-12

Wear Valley

2011-12

Eastbourne

2012-13

Wolverhampton

2012-13

Bassetlaw

2012-13

Doncaster

2013-14

Rounds 3-5 ALMOs who have yet to pass their Audit Commission inspection

Hackney

Yet to pass inspection

Lambeth (part)

Yet to pass inspection

Nottingham

Yet to pass inspection

Southend

Yet to pass inspection

Easington

Yet to pass inspection

South Tyneside

Yet to pass inspection

Round 6 bidders

Haringey

Discussions on investment programme ongoing after successful inspection

Basildon

Yet to pass inspection

Redbridge

Yet to pass inspection

Stevenage

Yet to pass inspection

Blackpool

Yet to pass inspection

Sutton

Yet to pass inspection

Havering

Yet to pass inspection

N E Derbyshire

Yet to pass inspection

Salford

Yet to pass inspection

Sedgemoor

Yet to pass inspection


Bellwin Scheme

Alistair Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much financial compensation has been given to local authorities affected by flooding in July 2007 which has not come from the Bellwin scheme. [166225]

John Healey: To date the Government have made available a significant package of up to £57 million to support areas affected by the flooding of June and July 2007. None of this has to date come from the Bellwin scheme. This includes the following assistance provided to local authorities and other public bodies:

In addition, over £11 million has been made available by Regional Development Agencies for businesses affected
21 Nov 2007 : Column 876W
in their regions. Regional Development Agencies continue to assess the needs of business in the affected regions and have adapted or expanded their support to meet such demand. Further information is available on the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) website:

Bellwin schemes have been activated nationwide, for all authorities affected by June and July floods, and are amongst the most generous ever. 50 local authorities have registered for assistance for the June scheme and 52 have registered for the July scheme. 20 local authorities have registered for both schemes. Authorities have six months to spend under this scheme and none have yet submitted their claim to Government.


21 Nov 2007 : Column 877W
Funding allocat ed to local authorities by the D epartment for C hildren, Schools and F amilies following the June and July 2007 floods (as of 19 November 2007)
£
Local authority Allocation for June floods Allocation for July floods Total allocation

Kingston upon Hull

3,214,424

3,214,424

East Riding of Yorkshire

1,477,549

1,477,549

Gloucestershire

1,007,900

1,007,900

Nottinghamshire

858,508

858,508

Rotherham

828,959

828,959

Worcestershire

50,000

644,102

694,102

Doncaster

614,862

614,862

Warwickshire

81,733

481,070

562,803

Sheffield

498,394

498,394

West Berkshire

423,404

423,404

Lincolnshire

210,930

210,930

Oxfordshire

180,422

180,422

Wakefield

179,373

179,373

Richmond

159,952

159,952

Merton

156,489

156,489

Herefordshire

50,000

106,011

156,011

Wokingham

129,942

129,942

Kingston Upon Thames

128,362

128,362

Barnsley

123,866

123,866

Croydon

121,580

121,580

Derbyshire

119,761

119,761

Surrey

118,989

118,989

Sutton

118,908

118,908

Wandsworth

110,591

110,591

Staffordshire

70,907

70,907

Solihull

70,735

70,735

Windsor and Maidenhead

60,072

60,072

Swindon

58,067

58,067

East Sussex

50,958

50,958

Birmingham

50,000

50,000

Dudley

50,000

50,000

Hammersmith and Fulham

50,000

50,000

Harrow

50,000

50,000

Kensington and Chelsea

50,000

50,000

Kirklees

50,000

50,000

Lambeth

50,000

50,000

Leeds

50,000

50,000

North East Lincolnshire

50,000

50,000

North Lincolnshire

50,000

50,000

North Yorkshire

50,000

50,000

Northamptonshire

50,000

50,000

Reading

50,000

50,000

Sandwell

50,000

50,000

Shropshire

50,000

50,000

Telford and Wrekin

50,000

50,000

Walsall

50,000

50,000

Total

9,050,001

4,306,819

13,356,820

Note:
As well as these allocations to local authorities, DCSF has paid for surveyors used by some local authorities, and will be meeting some other local authority costs from the contingency fund remaining from the overall allocation of £14 million

Next Section Index Home Page