---

27 Nov 2007 : Column 356W—continued

N umber of ASBOs issued at all courts, as reported to the Home Office by the Court Service, by period and where restrictions are imposed within a local authority area( 1) within Greater London, up to 31 December 2005
			1 January to 31 December
Greater London	1 April 1999 to 31 May 2000( 2)	1 June to 31 December 2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	1 April 1999 to 31 December 2005
Greater London	9	19	15	21	140	441	532	1,177
Barking and Dagenham	n/a	—	—	—	2	4	19	25
Barnet	n/a	—	2	—	1	10	9	22
Bexley	n/a	2	—	6	4	4	6	22
Brent	n/a	—	—	—	8	6	11	25
Bromley	n/a	1	—	—	5	3	5	14
Camden	n/a	5	1	10	30	57	69	172
City of London Corp	n/a	—	—	—	—	10	6	16
Croydon	n/a	1	—	—	7	8	10	26
Ealing	n/a	—	—	—	1	14	9	24
Enfield	n/a	—	—	—	2	4	15	21
Greenwich	n/a	—	3	1	3	8	11	26
Hackney	n/a	—	1	1	1	15	14	32
Hammersmith and Fulham	n/a	—	2	—	4	12	16	34
Haringey	n/a	—	—	—	5	34	25	64
Harrow	n/a	—	—	—	1	12	2	15
Havering	n/a	—	—	—	1	9	19	29
Hillingdon	n/a	—	—	—	—	18	36	54
Hounslow	n/a	—	—	—	7	23	22	52
Islington	n/a	—	—	—	10	6	10	26
Kensington and Chelsea Royal Borough	n/a	—	—	—	1	9	7	17
Kingston-on-Thames	n/a	—	—	—	4	4	5	13
Lambeth	n/a	1	2	1	2	20	20	46
Lewisham	n/a	—	2	—	5	16	12	35
Merton	n/a	—	—	1	2	13	10	26
Newham	n/a	—	2	—	—	5	11	18
Redbridge	n/a	—	—	—	1	8	9	18
Richmond upon Thames	n/a	—	—	—	3	10	13	26
Southwark	n/a	—	—	—	8	11	18	37
Sutton	n/a	3	—	—	7	7	19	36
Tower Hamlets	n/a	—	—	1	3	16	36	56
Waltham Forest	n/a	—	—	—	—	15	11	26
Wandsworth	n/a	—	—	—	6	12	12	30
Westminster	n/a	6	—	—	6	38	35	85
n/a = not available (1) This local authority area table differs from criminal justice system area (cjsa) tables in that an issuing court can be outside the area in which the restrictions have been imposed. For example, an issuing court may be in Kent (cjsa) but restrictions apply solely to a local authority area within London. (2) Between 1 April 1999 to 31 May 2000 data were collected on aggregate numbers only by police force area (pfa). Notes: 1. Previously issued data have been revised following joint Home Office/Court Service data reconciliation exercises. 2. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account.

---