|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many pregnant teenagers under the age of 18 were being housed in
(a) bed and breakfast accommodation and (b) hostels for single homeless adults in each local authority area, in the latest period for which figures are available. 
Andrew Stunell: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what mechanisms her Department has in place to ensure that databases containing personal information on members of the general public are not accessed (a) by unauthorised staff and (b) by authorised staff for unauthorised purposes; 
(8) how many times electronic data containing personal information on members of the public have been transferred (a) physically and (b) electronically between her Department and another body in each year since 1997. 
Mr. Rob Wilson: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998 requiring investigation there have been in the last five years in her Department; what the nature such breaches were; and what the results of the investigations were in each case. 
Mr. Vara: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government on how many occasions the Information Commissioner was contacted by her Department to report breaches of data protection security in each of the last five years. 
Tom Brake: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether she plans to review how her Department transports data; and whether her Department uses TNT to transport data. 
Mr. Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many confirmed data security breaches there have been in her Department in the last 36 months; and what action was taken after each occurrence. 
Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) how many items of post sent by her Department and its predecessors were reported missing by the intended recipient in each year since 1997; 
Mr. Dhanda: I refer the hon. Members to the statement made by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister on 21 November 2007, Official Report, column 1179. The review by the Cabinet Secretary and security experts is looking at procedures within Departments and agencies for the storage and use of data. A statement on Departments' procedures will be made on completion of the review.
Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the percentage turnover of staff was in (a) her Department and (b) her Departments agencies in (i) the last 12-month period and (ii) the last 24-month period for which figures are available. 
Turnover has been calculated on a headcount basis as the number of leavers over the period expressed as a proportion of the staff in post at the start of the period. The figures include Communities staff working in the Government Office network. Information for Executive agencies is not held centrally.
Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will place in the Library copies of the in-house staff magazine of her Department from the last 12 months. 
Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she will announce her conclusions and intentions in response to the consultation on modernising empty property relief. 
Mr. Iain Wright: Following consideration of responses to the consultation document Modernising Empty Property Relief, we intend to announce our decisions on the future exemptions from reformed empty property rates and on proposed new anti-avoidance regulations later in the year.
Mr. Kidney: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many (a) enforcement notices have been served and (b) prosecutions have been brought as a result of non-compliance with the energy efficiency requirements in Part L of the Building Regulations in each year since 2002. 
Mr. Iain Wright: Enforcement of compliance with the Building Regulations is undertaken by local authorities. There is no central register of enforcement notices served or prosecutions brought. In the main, local authorities aim to resolve issues that arise through inspection of and advice to those undertaking work. Enforcement notices and prosecution are only used as a last resort.
Alistair Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) if she will set out her response to the concerns of the European Commission which have led to the suspension of European Regional Development Fund funding in (a) the west midlands, (b) London and (c) the north West; and what steps she is taking to tackle the concerns; 
John Healey [holding answer 13 November 2007]: The suspension of ERDF payments stems from specific concerns identified by the Commission in the level of on-site project monitoring. The Government have carried out intensive work to increase the level of checks and strengthen reporting. Each affected region is being assessed individually by the Commission and as a result the suspensions have now been lifted in the west midlands, northeast, Yorkshire and The Humber, northwest objective 1, and Peterborough. A total of £243 million in ERDF payments was held back for those regions by the Commission, and payments have now been fully resumed. We are waiting to hear about the lifting of the suspensions of payments for London. In the case of the northwest objective 2 programme we are carrying out urgent further work to re-assure the Commission before a final decision is taken.
The European Commission is currently holding back around £7 million in relation to the London objective 2 and Stockwell urban programmes and around £19 million in relation to the north-west objective 2 and Burnley urban programmes.
Mr. Dismore: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the total cost of the FiReControl project team has been to date including (a) staffing costs, (b) secondment costs, (c) payments made by fire authorities under the new burdens principle and (d) travel costs. 
Mr. Dhanda: To the end of October 2007 the cost (net of receipts) for the National FiReControl Team was £42,011,903. This figure includes (a) £5,767,265 staffing (including civil servants, interim and agency staff), (b) secondments at £4,394,071 and (c) travel costs at £813,603.
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much has been spent on the (a) staffing costs, (b) secondment costs, (c) payments made to fire consultancies under the new burdens principle, (d) travel costs and (e) other costs of the FireLink project team. 
Mr. Dhanda: The following table sets out the Firelink project costs under the requested headings for the period August 2002 to October 2007. Project management costs are met in part by the Scottish Executive and the Welsh Assembly Government.
Mr. Carswell: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what meetings (a) she and (b) her officials have had with (i) Haven Gateway Partnership and (ii) lobbyists engaged by Haven Gateway Partnership in the last 12 months. 
Mr. Iain Wright: My right hon. Friend has not had any meetings with the Haven Gateway Partnership or their lobbyists in the last 12 months. Communities and Local Government officials have met with members of the Haven Gateway Partnership and some of their stakeholders in January 2007 and with representatives from Colchester borough council in July 2007. In addition, officials from the Government Office for the east of England meet with the Haven Gateway Partnership on a regular basis in support of their growth ambitions, as they do with all New Growth Point areas in their region. There have been no meetings between officials and lobbyists.
Mr. Randall: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what percentage of new builds in (a) Uxbridge constituency, (b) each London borough and (c) England were built on (i) previously developed land and (ii) back gardens in the last five years. 
There is no direct indicator which can be used to determine how many dwellings have been built on back gardens. The Land Use Change Statistics dataset contains information on changes in land use in England and is used to answer questions on this topic. In this dataset, land use is divided into 24 categories. However, gardens, patios, garages and other cartilage as well as dwellings themselves are all classified as Residential. It is therefore not directly possible to determine whether or not dwellings have been built on a garden. This has not changed since the Land Use Change Statistics were introduced in 1989.
As a proxy, we use data on previously-residential land instead of back gardens, but this includes conversions, sites where dwellings are demolished and replaced as well as building on back gardens and other types of development.
Over the period 2002 to 2006 (the most recent years for which data are available) 94 per cent. of dwellings in the Uxbridge constituency were built on previously-developed land. This compares to 95 per cent. across the whole of London and 70 per cent. across England. Over the same period 33 per cent. of dwellings in the Uxbridge constituency were built on previously-residential land. This compares to 20 per cent. across the whole of London and 18 per cent. across England.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|