Previous Section Index Home Page

10 Dec 2007 : Column 139W—continued


Homelessness

Grant Shapps: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the number of people in England who were (a) squatting, (b) facing eviction, (c) in temporary accommodation, (d) living in severe overcrowding and (e) staying with friends or family because they have no accommodation at the latest date for which figures are available. [165786]

Mr. Iain Wright: The information requested is as follows.

Temporary accommodation

Information about local authorities’ actions under homelessness legislation is collected quarterly at local authority level, in respect of households rather than people. Information reported each quarter by local authorities about their activities under homelessness legislation includes the number of households accepted by local authorities as eligible for assistance, unintentionally homeless and in priority need, and therefore owed a main homelessness duty. The duty owed to an accepted household is to secure suitable accommodation. If a settled home is not immediately available, the authority may secure temporary accommodation until a settled home becomes available. This data is published in our quarterly statistical release on Statutory Homelessness, available on our website and placed in the Library each quarter. The latest release was published on 10 September 2007 and contains data for the period April to June 2007:

The latest figures show that there were 84,900 households in temporary accommodation in England on 30 June 2007. This is down from 101,000 in December 2004.

Overcrowding

Over the period 2003-04 to 2005-06 it is estimated, from Survey of English Housing figures, that there were 47,000 households in England living in severely overcrowded conditions.


10 Dec 2007 : Column 140W

The benchmark for assessing whether or not a household is overcrowded or severely overcrowded is the Bedroom Standard. This is determined for each household in accordance with its age/sex/marital status composition and the relationship of the members to one another. A separate bedroom is required:

Further, any unpaired person aged 10-20 is paired, if possible with a child under 10 of the same sex, or, if that is not possible, he or she is counted as requiring a separate bedroom, as is any unpaired child under 10.

This standard is then compared with the actual number of bedrooms (including bed-sitters) available for the sole use of the household. Bedrooms converted to other uses are not counted as available unless they have been denoted as bedrooms by the residents. Bedrooms not actually in use are counted unless uninhabitable.

If a household has fewer bedrooms than implied by the standard then it is deemed to be ‘overcrowded’. Since one bedroom will be sufficient for single person households and for married/cohabiting couples, these households cannot be overcrowded according to the bedroom standard. If a household has two or more bedrooms fewer than implied by the standard then it is deemed to be ‘severely overcrowded’.

The Government are committed to addressing overcrowding and to updating the standards. We have already announced our intention to increase the numbers of affordable housing, including family sized social properties, to help to support a reduction in overcrowding.

Households facing eviction

Data from the Ministry of Justice indicate that in the year to 30 September 2007, there were 61,532 outright landlord orders. This figure should not be taken as an indication of how many households have been repossessed through the courts, since not all orders result in actual eviction.

No reliable information on the number of squatters, or people staying with family or friends because they have no accommodation, is collected centrally.

Housing

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment she has made of the reasons for the reduction in the number of new residential dwellings built on previously developed land in the last 12 months; and what proportion of new residential dwellings were built on previously developed land in (a) 2005 and (b) 2006 in (i) England and (ii) each Government Office Region. [171715]

Mr. Iain Wright: In 2006, on a provisional estimate, 74 per cent. of all new dwellings were built on previously developed (“brownfield”) land, compared to 77 per cent. in 2005. The figures for each region and
10 Dec 2007 : Column 141W
both years, including and excluding conversions of buildings into dwellings, can be seen in the following table.

Due to the way the data are collected, all statistics are subject to revision, and the 2006 statistics are marked as provisional because they are more susceptible to change. There is an inevitable time-lag between land use change occurring and it being recorded causing these revisions.

The statistics are the best estimates available; however the Department is constantly researching the figures to ensure they are as robust as possible.

No assessment has yet been made of this reduction. The target for development on previously developed land remains 60 per cent. and this is being achieved.

New dwellings built on previously-developed land
Excluding conversions Including conversions
2005 2006( 1) 2005 2006( 1)

North East

69

71

71

72

North West

81

83

83

85

Yorkshire and the Humber

73

67

77

70

East Midlands

54

65

60

69

West Midlands

76

79

79

81

East of England

70

64

72

66

London

97

90

97

90

South East

75

74

78

76

South West

62

58

67

63

England

74

72

77

74

(1 )Provisional
Notes:
1. There is an inevitable time-lag between land use change occurring and it being recorded, therefore data are constantly being updated.
2. The data in the table are based on records received from Ordnance Survey up to June 2007, published in October 2007 in Land Use Change in England to 2006: Additional Tables LUCS-22A.

Housing Market Pathfinder Programme

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when her Department will respond to the most recent National Audit Office report on the Housing Market Pathfinder programme. [171503]

Yvette Cooper: The National Audit Office report has now been considered by the Public Accounts Committee, which will report in due course. The Government will then respond to its recommendations.

Housing: Public Participation

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will place in the Library a copy of each of the responses from external organisations and individuals to the recent Housing Green Paper. [171509]

Yvette Cooper: As we indicated in the recent Housing Green Paper, my Department will publish a summary of responses to the consultation on the Green Paper in early 2008.


10 Dec 2007 : Column 142W

Housing: Sales

Andrew Stunell: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what projections she has made of the number of properties with two or more bedrooms to be made available to buy through (a) Social HomeBuy, (b) New Build HomeBuy, (c) Open Market HomeBuy and (d) the First Time Buyers Initiative in each of the next three financial years; [170355]

(2) what projections she has made of the number of homes to be made available to buy through (a) Social HomeBuy, (b) New Build HomeBuy, (c) Open Market HomeBuy and (d) the First Time Buyers Initiative in each of the next three financial years. [170356]

Yvette Cooper: As stated in our Housing Green Paper, we are aiming to provide at least 25,000 shared ownership and shared equity homes in each of the next three years.

Funding for housing is distributed between the Regions on the basis of an analysis of relative need which takes account of local authority need. Announcements as to the levels of funding to be made available for affordable housing for the next three years will be made shortly.

The funding is being made available to bids from both housing associations, developers and local authorities through the Housing Corporation’s bidding round for the National Affordable Housing Programme. Investment in 2008-11 and completions and size of units will depend on the bids received by the Housing Corporation.

Housing: Standards

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the Government's targets for new house-building in England were in each year since 1997-98. [171568]

Mr. Iain Wright: Detailed housing targets are not directly set by Government, but are set out in regional and local plans which are developed through regional and local planning processes. The Government set the overall strategy for housing supply in England. The 2003 Sustainable Communities Plan set out a target to increase housing supply from 900,000 to 1.1 million in the RPG9 area (the wider South East) over the course of the plan, and the Government's 2005 response to the Barker review of Housing Supply announced an ambition to increase housing supply in England from 150,000 to 200,000 per annum by 2016.

The Housing Green Paper, "Homes for the Future: more affordable, more sustainable" (CM 7191), published in July, set out a target to increase housing supply to 240,000 additional homes per annum by 2016.

Institute for Public Policy Research: Finance

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what funding has (a) her Department and (b) its agencies provided to (a) the IPPR and (b) IPPR Ltd. in relation to community cohesion in the last 24 months; and for what projects. [171612]


10 Dec 2007 : Column 143W

Mr. Dhanda: Communities and Local Government has not commissioned work from IPPR on cohesion in the last 24 months. However, the Commission on Integration and Cohesion did. This was a thinkpiece about challenging attitudes, perceptions and myths, which informed their work and was published on their website. The Commission was funded by Communities and Local Government.

Lee Valley Regional Park Authority

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the levy on
10 Dec 2007 : Column 144W
authorities in (a) Essex, (b) Hertfordshire and (c) Greater London by the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority was (i) in cash terms and (ii) expressed as the average addition to a Band D council tax bill in each year since 1997-98. [171621]

John Healey: Details of the levy raised by the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority on authorities in Essex, Hertfordshire and Greater London, both in cash terms and expressed as the average addition to a Band D council tax bill in each year since 1997-98, are shown in the following tables. These data have been provided by the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority.


10 Dec 2007 : Column 145W

10 Dec 2007 : Column 146W
£
1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03

Corporation of London

8,396

8,448

9,181

9,792

10,989

11,234

Inner London boroughs

Camden

202,656

203,412

209,664

215,420

223,034

227,099

Greenwich

170,964

172,392

177,753

180,782

188,016

193,181

Hackney

146,160

151,020

156,279

162,837

114,435

139,994

Hammersmith and Fulham

179,028

178,020

181,951

184,044

190,400

195,065

Islington

167,736

167,424

171,988

174,937

181,662

189,459

Kensington and Chelsea

213,036

215,592

222,809

228,941

235,761

239,138

Lambeth

219,288

219,156

226,277

230,754

239,968

249,803

Lewisham

201,432

199,536

205,159

208,426

214,838

221,163

Southwark

203,172

203,736

211,206

212,552

218,760

221,195

Tower Hamlets

133,800

137,004

146,492

154,641

169,451

175,502

Wandsworth

261,408

261,168

269,405

275,851

285,477

290,469

Westminster

254,640

257,556

267,163

274,714

289,402

297,240

Outer London boroughs

Barking and Dagenham

122,784

122,388

125,537

128,058

133,464

135,322

Barnet

316,788

316,416

325,639

333,862

346,451

351,694

Bexley

201,324

199,260

204,289

208,058

214,419

216,982

Brent

221,184

220,812

226,303

230,176

234,871

237,944

Bromley

317,496

315,732

322,988

327,601

336,276

340,572

Croydon

296,472

298,332

307,392

313,872

322,314

328,811

Ealing

266,376

265,668

274,105

278,322

286,418

291,071

Enfield

251,436

249,564

256,591

257,747

267,355

272,671

Haringey

193,296

191,868

196,379

199,015

205,414

208,533

Harrow

196,776

196,164

202,277

205,720

209,692

215,493

Havering

210,528

208,152

213,718

217,076

223,138

226,886

Hillingdon

229,032

228,096

233,902

236,614

245,858

248,388

Hounslow

190,656

192,876

197,284

200,293

203,776

209,339

Kingston upon Thames

144,408

144,888

149,018

151,434

156,397

157,703

Merton

175,104

173,496

177,706

180,663

185,966

188,133

Newham

150,528

151,884

157,708

160,948

171,573

177,240

Redbridge

206,820

207,312

212,781

218,024

222,920

227,739

Richmond upon Thames

197,400

196,212

204,006

208,856

215,130

218,394

Sutton

170,808

170,616

174,900

177,000

181,766

184,368

Waltham Forest

177,072

175,128

180,339

182,302

187,264

191,367

All London

6,598,004

6,599,328

6,798,187

6,929,332

7,112,654

7,279,194

Hertfordshire

996,996

993,948

1,025,843

1,047,147

1,083,538

1,100,039

Essex

1,273,800

1,165,872

1,208,017

1 ,234,569

1,280,441

1,304,343

Thurrock

110,976

114,953

117,852

122,366

125,323

Southend on Sea

140,376

Total levy

8,868,800

9,010,500

9,147,000

9,328,900

9,599,000

9,808,900

Levy as Band D equivalent (£)

2.48

2.45

2.51

2.54

2.60

2.63


Next Section Index Home Page