Political agreement was reached on draft legislation to include airlines in the EUs carbon emission trading scheme (EU ETS). The overall package ensures an environmentally effective scheme, most notably by ensuring that the emissions cap has been set at the average of 2004-6 emissions, in line with UK ambition. The package agreed at Council also includes: a 2012 start date in one phase; 10 per cent. auctioning for 2012, with the figure for 2013 onwards to be decided as part of the review of the EU ETS; and a de minimis clause that applies only to commercial air transport operators. The UK supports the agreement reached.
The Council was unable to reach political agreement on a presidency compromise amending a Commission proposal for a soil framework directive. Several member states (including the UK) did not consider that the changes went far enough to resolve outstanding concerns, notably in relation to provisions on contaminated land and soil sealing, or to bring the proposals into line with the principles of better regulation and subsidiarity. The UK nevertheless made it clear that it remained supportive of the aims of the Commissions thematic strategy for the protection of soil and of the need for all member states to take action to improve efforts to preserve this vital natural resource.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health (Ann Keen): The organ donation taskforce has today presented a report making a number of recommendations to increase organ donation rates in the UK. The recommendations largely concentrate on the infrastructure required in order to enable the UK to maximise its potential for organ donation rates. The taskforce believes that if implemented in full, a 50 per cent. increase in donation rates is achievable over five years.
The Government accept the recommendations and look forward to working with stakeholders as part of the implementation process. The taskforce report has been placed in the Library and copies are available for hon. Members in the Vote Office.
The Leader of the House of Commons (Ms Harriet Harman): The 2007 Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) Triennial Review of Parliamentary Pay, Pensions and Allowances was published today. The Government have considered the SSRB report and will today table motions that will be debated in the House on 24 January. The Commons will debate and vote on resolutions to express their views. Final implementation of any opinion on pay is dependent on the Commons agreement to an additional resolution.
This debate and decision will take place in the context of the current public sector pay policy. MPs and Ministers are paid by the public purse. The Government have committed to ensuring that public sector pay awards remain consistent with the continued achievement of the inflation target of 2 per cent. The Government believe that the principles that apply to public sector pay deals should also apply to MPs to entrench economic stability by holding down inflationary expectations and helping to maintain the economic stability we have seen over the past decade.
The Government believe that there should be a clear, transparent and independent mechanism for setting the pay and pension of MPs. It is inappropriate that MPs should vote on their own pay and pensions. The Government therefore intend to examine options that find objective criteria for determining the appropriate comparator used for MPs pay awards within a framework that does not require MPs to vote in future years, and accordingly has asked Sir John Baker, CBEthe retiring chair of SSRBto conduct a review and make proposals on options for consideration. It would be a significant constitutional reform for MPs to be explicitly removed from the process of voting on and determining their own pay and pensions. In some other countries, elected representatives pay and pensions are determined entirely independently of the legislature. We hope to draw on this international experience so as to find a suitable mechanism that will work within our parliamentary system. We intend this work to be completed so that the House can resolve it before the summer recess.
The Government are tabling a motion in relation to MPs pay for the year 2007-08 and seeking the Houses support for Sir John Bakers review. There will be separate motions on pensions and allowances.
|Financial Year||SSRB recommendation|
The Government believe the SSRB recommendation on pay for 2007-08 should be staged, with 0.84 per cent. increase backdated to 1 April 2007 and a further 1.06 per cent. backdated to 1 November 2007. This would give a 1.9 per cent. increase across the year 2007-08 and a final salary of £61,820.
With respect to pay for future years, the Government consider that MPs pay in the future, including 2008-09, should be determined by a mechanism that is independent of MPs votes and therefore do not propose taking forward the SSRB recommendations pending Sir John Bakers review of both the appropriate comparator and mechanism for determining MPs pay.
Ministers pay is set under the Ministerial and Other Salaries Act 1975. SSRB recommends that the salaries for the Prime Minister, Ministers and other office holders in the Commons should increase more than the salary of MPs. The Government do not accept the proposal and believe that Ministerial salaries should increase at the same rate as MPs.
SSRB makes recommendations to change severance pay for Ministers who leave office. The recommendations are that Ministers or other office holders who are reappointed to a salaried Government or parliamentary post within three months of leaving office should keep a pro rata severance payment and the balance repaid. SSRB recommends abolishing the age bar of 65 that currently applies to severance payments.
SSRB recommends that the salary supplements paid to chairs of Select and Public Bill Committees should be increased by the same percentage as the overall increase in MPs salary. The Government accept this principle and propose that the supplements be increased in line with the increases in MPs salaries.
In respect of pensions, the SSRB has proposed the introduction of an optional 1/60th accrual rate. The Government accept this proposal in principle and are prepared to introduce it when the change can be made as part of a cost-neutral package.
SSRB makes a number of recommendations aimed at limiting the cost to the taxpayer of Parliamentary pensions. These include the 50:50 sharing between Members and the Exchequer of future increases or decreases in pension cost pressures, and restricting the underlying Exchequer contribution to the scheme, other than in respect of the deficit identified at the last valuation, to a maximum of 20 per cent. of payroll. The SSRB also recommends that there should be a review of parliamentary pension provision if the costs are rising significantly such that the 20 per cent. cap on the Exchequer contribution is likely to be breached. These recommendations are consistent with the approach being taken in public service pension schemes generally and the Government accept them. The Government propose that the detail of the arrangements should be worked up in consultation with the trustees of the parliamentary pension scheme so that it can be taken into account by the Government Actuary in his 2008 valuation of the scheme.
SSRB recommends that future holders of the offices of Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor and Commons Speaker are covered by the parliamentary pension and severance arrangements that apply to Secretaries of State rather than the pension arrangements that apply now. The Government accept this recommendation with respect to Prime Ministers and Lord Chancellors. The Government do not propose to implement this recommendation with respect to future Commons Speakers, as they consider the position of Speaker to be substantially different from that of a Prime Minister or Lord Chancellor.
SSRB recommends that the staffing allowance ceiling should be altered to allow an increase from the equivalent of 3.0 to up to 3.5 full-time, or equivalent, members of staff recognising that the amount of case work for many MPs has increased. The Government accept this proposal.
expenditure on offices;
expenditure on travel;
compensation for leaving office and;
a range of other matters
Given the detailed nature of the proposals, the Government propose that they should be referred to the Members Estimate Committee to examine in light of observations by the Advisory Panel on Members Allowances.
The SSRB proposes that increases in pay for Lords Ministers are aligned with that of increases in Commons Ministers pay in accordance with current practice. The Government accept this recommendation. It is proposed that Lords Ministers pay will be increased by 1.95 per cent. for 2007-08 in line with the proposed increase in
MPs pay, and that from 1 April 2008, increases in Lords Ministers pay will be made via the same mechanism as for MPs and other Ministers.
Recommendations on MPs pensions will also apply to Lords Ministers pensionsthe Governments position is as for Ministers within the Commons. The age bar that currently applies for severance pay will also be abolished for Lords Ministers as for Ministers within the Commons.
Additionally, the Government agree with the proposal to continue the existing salary arrangements for the Leader of the Opposition, Opposition Chief Whip, Chairman of Committees and Deputy Chairman of Committees. Related to this, the Government accept the SSRB recommendation that seeks to peg the salary of the Lord Speaker on a mark time basis pending the next review of parliamentary pay or reform of House of Lords.
Until recently the Lord Chancellor was head of the judiciary as well as Speaker of the House of Lords, and is entitled in legislation to a salary £2,500 higher than the Lord Chief Justice. Given the post no longer now has those functions, the SSRB recommends that where the post of Lord Chancellor is held by someone who also holds another ministerial post, that person should receive only the salary for the ministerial post. The Government accept this recommendation.
The SSRB made three recommendations on Lords allowances: on the extension of the spouses, civil partners and childrens travel entitlement to include a named partner; for reviews of the definition of parliamentary business for the purpose of the subsistence allowance; and for a review of IT support for Members. These recommendations should be considered in the first instance by the House Committee.