Previous Section Index Home Page

24 Jan 2008 : Column 2180W—continued


24 Jan 2008 : Column 2181W

Innovation, Universities and Skills

Education: Trade Unions

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how many trained union learning representatives there were in each year for which figures are available. [178940]

Mr. Lammy: Union learning representatives (ULRs) are lay union representatives, whose main function is to advise union members about their training, educational and development needs. Since the launch of the Union Learning Fund (ULF) in 1998, and the introduction of statutory rights for ULRs to train and carry out their duties in 2003, more than 18,000 have been trained helping more than 400,000 people into learning.

Both employers and workers stand to benefit from ULRs. They are an inexpensive source of expert advice for employers. They are particularly effective in reaching workers with basic skills needs—people who may be reluctant to take advantage of training opportunities. In that sense, ULRs help to stimulate a demand for learning and training among a group which employers find it hard to reach.

Rounded figures for trained ULRs since April 1999 are as follows:

As at April each year Number

1999

730

2000

1,600

2001

3,000

2002

4,700

2003

6,700

2004

10,300

2005

14,000

2006

16,000

2007

18,000


Overseas Students: Finance

Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills further to his letter of 7 September 2007 to the Chairman of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, whether a UK resident or citizen with a qualification from an overseas institution deemed to be equivalent to or lower than a qualification which they wish to study will qualify for public funding for higher education courses in English institutions where they have not previously accessed public funding for higher education within the UK. [177292]

Bill Rammell: Subject to exceptions for particular categories of students and subjects on which HEFCE has been consulting, such citizens who wished to study for a qualification equivalent to or lower than the one already obtained from an overseas’ institution would not qualify for the purposes of institutional public funding. Our clear priority is to widen participation and increase the incentives for higher education providers to attract and retain more of the millions of people without a first higher education qualification, wherever that qualification was obtained.


24 Jan 2008 : Column 2182W

Union Learning Fund

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills pursuant to the answer of 12 December 2007, Official Report, columns 754-55W, on Union Learning Fund, by what means trained union learning representatives help workers back into learning under the Union Learning Fund. [178341]

Mr. Lammy: Union learning representatives (ULRs) are lay union representatives; whose main function is to advise union members about their training, educational and development needs. Since the launch of the Union Learning Fund (ULF) in 1998, and the introduction of statutory rights for ULRs to train and carry out their duties in 2003, more than 18,000 ULRs have been trained. Latest figures show that last year they helped over 150,000 workers into learning through a wide variety of ULF projects.

ULRs are trained to an approved standard by Unionlearn, the TUC’s learning organisation, or their own union to carry out their role in engaging, supporting and helping workers back into learning. This training provides the ULRs with a wide range of skills to help fellow workers back into learning including:

These are just some of the ways in which ULRs can help workers into learning, but perhaps most important is their ability to engage with those hard to reach learners who might otherwise be too embarrassed to admit their learning needs to an employer or supervisor but who trust a fellow worker who understands their point of view. In that sense, ULRs help to stimulate a demand for learning and training among a group which employers and training providers find it so difficult to reach.

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how many education or training places were funded through the Union Learning Fund in each year since 1998; and how many of these led to qualifications at level (a) 2 and (b) 3. [178575]

Mr. Lammy: The Union Learning Fund (ULF) is a source of funding to help trade unions boost their capacity as learning organisations and use their influence with employers, employees and learning providers to encourage greater take up of learning in the workplace. It is not used to fund the provision of training courses but enables trade unions and their union learning
24 Jan 2008 : Column 2183W
representatives to provide advice, guidance and support in order to help workers access learning opportunities to improve their skill levels.

With the help of ULF, trade unions and their union learning representatives have been really successful in working with employers to help people get back into learning, tackling both organisational and individual skill needs. There are now over 18,000 trained union learning representatives who have helped over 400,000 workers back into learning since the fund was introduced in 1998 there were over 150,000 last year alone, many of whom were Skills for Life learners, those most in need of new skills who employers and training providers find it so difficult to reach.

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what the 10 most expensive projects funded under the Union Learning Fund were in each year since 1998; and how much each cost. [178582]

Mr. Lammy: Trade unions have a key role to play in promoting the development of learning and skills in the workplace. To help them do this more effectively we introduced the Union Learning Fund (ULF) in 1998. This source of funding is helping trade unions use their influence with employers, employees and training providers to encourage greater take up of learning at work and boost their own capacity as learning organisations. The 10 projects that were awarded the most funding through the ULF in each financial year since 1998 are set out in the following tables identified by the lead union.


24 Jan 2008 : Column 2184W

24 Jan 2008 : Column 2185W
Project/union £

1998-99

GMB

148,349

AEEU

139,500

USDAW

113,550

GPMU

97,000

MSF

80,135

UNIFI

56,400

MU

50,000

NUJ

50,000

T&G

50,000

UCATT

50,000

1999-2000

GMB

188,210

AEEU

116,065

MSF

162,144

GPMU

158,009

T&G

155,680

Unison

137,325

ISTC

100,733

USDAW

94,450

CWU

87,950

PCS

84,500

2000-01

Unison

560,894

GPMU

345,535

MSF

343,720

GMB

343,217

AEEU

246,350

T&G

201,236

NUJ

176,800

UCATT

167,000

CATU

118,808

NUT

117,750

2001-02

GMB

1,079,568

Unison

831,704

NUT

534,871

T&G

421,540

GPMU

341,804

USDAW

234,892

AEEU

222,450

CWU

210,300

BFAWU

182,206

MSF

161,981

2002-03

AEEU

1,325,481

Unison

1,198,095

GPMU

889,889

GMB

850,049

CWU

848,000

MSF

835,361

T&G

426,128

BFAWU

354,745

NUJ

349,700

ASLEF

280,000

2003-04

USDAW

1,263,981

NASUWT

1,234,029

UNIFI

1,173,347

T&G

891,133

GMB

794,766

POA

691,913

NUT

611,350

GFTU

521,000

PCS

463,081

MSF

427,428

2004-05

GPMU

1,781,950

Rail unions

1,514,600

Amicus

1,478,900

FBU

1,144,000

BFAWU

850,725

Unison

801,600

T&G

588,933

PCS

570,216

UCATT

565,766

GMB

342,522

2005-06

T&G

2,319,299

GMB

1,933,208

UCATT

510,436

Community

380,658

GFTU

249,445

ATL

221,649

PCS

215,000

MU

196,685

BELTU

194,559

USDAW

152,000

2006-07

Amicus

3,414,517

Unison

2,212,528

Rail unions

1,971,951

PCS

1,366,020

FBU

1,248,168

BFAWU

1,190,233

USDAW

1,166,231

CWU

1,138,438

GMB

931,835

POA

883,360


Next Section Index Home Page