Previous Section Index Home Page

6 Mar 2008 : Column 2776W—continued

Fire Services: Buildings

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to her Answer of 25 February 2008, Official Report, column 1220W, on Fire Service’s buildings, what (a) primary and (b) other considerations were taken into account in determining the size of regional control centres. [192162]

Mr. Dhanda: The following factors were taken into account in determining the size of Regional Control Centres.

Each Regional Control Centre is part of a resilient network. It has been designed to deal with both its own workload, whilst also providing extra capacity to take on the work of other Regional Control Centres should they, for whatever reason, become overloaded or unavailable. Each building will contain a large control room, operations room, emergency planning room, and space to accommodate other staff or agencies as required for large scale incidents.

Each facility is designed to be self-supporting for seven days, and has been designed to incorporate uninterruptible power supplies (UPS), generators and fuel storage, with the ability to replenish fuel supplies from outside the secure area. Each also has significant water and effluent storage capacity.

Regional Control Centres will provide space for training new personnel, meeting rooms and provide adequate staff facilities, such as, canteen and locker rooms. Each building will also contain space for building services machinery and the main IT equipment room.

The Regional Control Centres have also been designed so there is capacity in the network to accommodate future growth in demand for call handling.


6 Mar 2008 : Column 2777W

Food: Standards

David Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what plans she has to ensure that local authorities act upon guidance offered by the Food Standards Agency in respect of (a) food provision for older people and (b) food served to adults in institutions in the provision of (i) meals on wheels, (ii) luncheon clubs, (iii) sheltered accommodation, (iv) staff catering and (v) other civic catering services. [191362]

Mr. Dhanda: The Department for Communities and Local Government has no responsibility for ensuring local authorities act upon guidance offered by the Food Standards Agency.

Government Offices for the Regions: Finance

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to her Answer of 21 February 2008, Official Report, columns 904W, on Government Offices for the Regions: Finance, what estimate she has made of the cost to her Department of managing centrally each Government Office’s estates budget. [192097]

Mr. Dhanda: The total central cost of managing the GO estate is estimated at £1.2 million, which covers the annual pay costs of the property asset management team.

The Government offices are funded by contributions from 10 sponsor Departments and the above costs are therefore not solely provided by CLG. The proportion of total spending provided by CLG is c.40 per cent. of the total, thus the CLG contribution to the cost of managing the network estates budget is £480,000.

Department Offices: Central London

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many of her Department’s staff are based in her Department’s central London offices. [187330]

Mr. Dhanda: On 31 January 2008 66 per cent. of the staff in Communities and Local Government were based in central London offices. This figure includes Communities staff who work in the Government Office network. Information for our Executive Agencies is not held centrally.

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the running costs for her Department’s central London offices were in 2007-08; and what they are budgeted to be in each of the next four years. [187332]

Mr. Dhanda: The running costs for Communities and Local Government’s central London offices in 2007-08 are forecast to be £47,520,156. At present the planned expenditure for 2008-09 is £41,836,460, however this is under active review since we are looking at options for further rationalisation of our estate. In addition we have a rent review pending which will impact the operating costs in later years.


6 Mar 2008 : Column 2778W

The figures given represent gross expenditure and do not reflect receipts from other building occupants.

The answer does not include IT and telephony costs or costs for the Government Office for London.

Hospices: Children

Mr. Swire: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what funding each local authority has made to children’s hospices in each of the last five years. [163712]

Mr. Dhanda: The information requested is not held centrally.

Housing: Disabled People

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) how much was spent by Castle Point Borough Council on improving homes for disabled people in each of the last three years; and if she will make a statement; [190705]

(2) how many home improvement grants for disabled people were (a) applied for and (b) awarded in Castle Point constituency in each of the last three years. [190706]

Mr. Iain Wright: Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) is a mandatory grant used to provide adaptations to the homes of disabled people. Local authorities in England report their annual Disabled Facilities Grant expenditure and the number of recipients of Disabled Facilities Grant through the Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix. The 2006-07 Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix report will be published shortly. The 2003-04 to 2005-06 expenditure is provided in the following table. Communities and Local Government provide 60 per cent. of the value of the Disabled Facilities Grant to local authorities. Local authorities fund the remaining 40 per cent. from other sources. In addition to Disabled Facilities Grant local authorities may improve the homes of disabled people with other funding streams not reported as part of the Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix. Communities and Local Government do not hold this information or information on how many people have applied for home improvement grants. The following table sets out Disabled Facilities Grant expenditure for Castle Point borough council:

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06

Total expenditure (£)

243,000

214,000

319,000

CLG contribution (£)

145,000

90,000

116,000

Number receiving DFG

36

31

55


Housing: Thames Gateway

Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the likely number of residential properties to be built on the tidal or fluvial floodplain
6 Mar 2008 : Column 2779W
in the Thames Gateway area over the next eight years; and if she will make a statement. [191322]

Caroline Flint: Because much of the new housing expected in the Thames Gateway has yet to be planned, it is not possible to determine accurately the amount that will be built within the floodplain. However, only some 35 per cent. of the entire Thames Gateway area itself is at risk from tidal or fluvial flooding.

Under PPS25—“Development and Flood Risk”—all local planning authorities (LPAs) are required to notify the Environment Agency when they become aware of an application for house building in the functional floodplain. The LPA will then make a judgment as to the acceptability of the risk, and also of the likely effect of the development on floodwater run-off rates. Flood-risk mitigation measures (such as land-raising, improvements to flood defences or porous paving) can then be devised and, if these will render the risk acceptable, make these a condition of planning consent.

The tidal flood defences in the Thames Gateway are of among the highest standards anywhere in the UK (exceeding a 1 in 2000 year event standard in the development areas) and, through its Thames estuary 2100 project, the Environment Agency is devising a detailed programme for maintaining those standards into the future.

Local Authorities: Publications

Robert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate (a) her Department and (b) the Lifting the Burdens Task Force has made of the cost to local authorities of publishing statutory notices. [191655]

John Healey: The 2006 Cabinet Office report ‘Informing the Public in the multimedia age’ approximated that the annual cost of publishing statutory notices could be up to £30 million.

The Lifting the Burdens Task Force have not made any estimate of the cost of publishing statutory notices.

Local Government Ombudsman: Complaints

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many complaints were (a) received, (b) investigated and (c) upheld by the Local Government Ombudsman for England in each of the last 10 years, broken down by the council or agency for which the complaint was filed. [189151]

Mr. Dhanda: This information has been placed in the Library of the House.

Local Government: Occupational Pensions

John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she plans to make a decision on extending protection of the Rule of 85 for the Local Government Pension Scheme; and if she will make a statement. [191891]


6 Mar 2008 : Column 2780W

John Healey: My statement to the House on 13 December 2007, Official Report, column 49WS, announced that the Local Government Pension Scheme Policy Review Group, with the assistance of the Government Actuary’s Department, had been asked to undertake a fresh costings exercise of extending the current levels of protection in the scheme, following the removal of the Rule of 85, using 2007 actuarial valuation data. An announcement will be made as soon as the current work is completed.

As Ministers have consistently made clear, to maintain the scheme’s viability and to meet the Government’s policy of ensuring no adverse effects on taxpayers, the costs of any amendments to improve the level of protections would need to be provided from within the scheme, and be affordable and legal.

Drinking Water

Mr. Peter Ainsworth: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many litres of bottled water were purchased by her Department and its predecessor in each of the last three years; and if she will make a statement. [191247]

Mr. Dhanda: Communities and Local Government purchased the following quantities of bottled water in each of the last three years.

Central Department Executive agencies

2005

12,735

12,408

2006

12,735

13,378

2007

14,150

17,724

Note:
Figures for 2005 and 2006 are approximate.

Minister for London: Domestic Visits

Tom Brake: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what visits the Minister for London has made to each constituency in London since appointment. [190526]

Mr. Dhanda: The Minister for the Olympics and London, in her capacity as Minister for London, has visited or attended meetings in the following constituencies since June 2007.

National Community Forum: Finance

Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what funding her Department provided to the National Community Forum in each of the last three years; what funding it plans to provide in each of the next three years; and if she will make a statement. [190111]

Mr. Dhanda: The funding allocated to the National Community Forum (NCF) in each of the last three financial years is laid out in the following table:


6 Mar 2008 : Column 2781W
Financial year Funding allocated (£)

2005-06

200,000

2006-07

200,000

2007-08

200,000


Decisions on future funding have not yet been made.

Regional Ministers: Finance

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to her Answer of 25 February 2008, Official Report, columns 1228-29W, what (a) non-cash allocations and (b) funds for a voluntary early release scheme Government Offices for the Regions have received in financial year 2007-08; and what the purpose of such funding was in each instance. [192096]

Mr. Dhanda: The total non-cash allocation received by the Government offices is £3.2 million. This is principally to cover the cost of dilapidation provisions, depreciation and cost of capital incurred by the Government office network. It also however includes the non-cash funding of the release schemes—which is a net allocation of £702,000.

The Government offices have received £5 million from sponsor Departments for the 2007 release scheme, which includes the £702,000 non-cash referred to in (a) above. This pays for the in-year costs of the staff who have volunteered to take early release from the Government offices as well as setting up a provision for the future costs of those staff who will receive payments in future years.

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the Answer of 25 February 2008, Official Report, column 1229W, on regional Ministers: finance, which programme budgets are administered by the Government Offices for the Regions, broken down by sponsoring Department. [192098]

Mr. Dhanda: The information from 2006-07, which is the most recent year the data were collected, is as follows:

Sponsor Department Programme funding (£)

Department for Transport

2,389,000,000

Communities and Local Government

2,180,046,041

Department for Works and Pensions

1,150,845,613

Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

947,214,000

Department for Education and Skills

811,379,686

Home Office

233,313,878

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

16,155,346

Total

7,727,954,564


Next Section Index Home Page