Previous Section Index Home Page

3 Apr 2008 : Column 1293W—continued


Norman Lamb: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many children were born to drug-dependent mothers in each of the last five years, broken down by (a) region and (b) type of drug. [195452]


3 Apr 2008 : Column 1294W

Dawn Primarolo: The following tables show the number of deliveries finished consultant episodes (FCEs) by drug dependent mothers by strategic health authority (SHA) region in 2002-03 to 2005-06, and in 2006-07; and the number of deliveries (FCEs) to drug dependent mothers for the same period, broken down by diagnosis code and type of drug used.

Count of deliveries by drug dependent mothers broken down by SHA of residence, 2002-03 to 2005-06
Total finished consultant delivery episodes
SHA of residence 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA

489

362

410

360

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHA

*

*

*

*

Essex SHA

11

37

11

7

North West London SHA

10

15

110

6

North Central London SHA

40

25

11

12

North East London SHA

18

7

6

19

South East London SHA

16

10

21

42

South West London SHA

12

10

12

6

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear SHA

66

55

44

22

County Durham and Tees Valley SHA

162

77

52

28

North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire SHA

31

22

24

12

West Yorkshire SHA

45

33

47

39

Cumbria and Lancashire SHA

126

233

69

42

Greater Manchester SHA

110

92

80

22

Cheshire and Merseyside SHA

105

111

65

60

Thames Valley SHA

16

19

14

11

Hampshire and Isle of Wight SHA

10

10

8

*

Kent and Medway SHA

21

27

21

35

Surrey and Sussex SHA

43

33

34

24

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA

38

40

36

27

South West Peninsula SHA

20

16

16

9

Dorset and Somerset SHA

*

8

6

12

South Yorkshire SHA

126

114

78

60

Trent SHA

122

105

93

80

Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland SHA

26

34

40

21

Shropshire and Staffordshire SHA

65

59

43

30

Birmingham and the Black Country SHA

167

138

81

45

West Midlands South SHA

38

33

19

8

Other and Unknown

17

13

6

15

Total

1,956

1,741

1,460

1,057



3 Apr 2008 : Column 1295W

3 Apr 2008 : Column 1296W
2006-07
SHA of residence Total finished consultant delivery episodes

North East SHA

267

North West SHA

305

Yorkshire and the Humber SHA

227

East Midlands SHA

160

West Midlands SHA

287

East of England SHA

506

London SHA

58

South East Coast SHA

51

South Central SHA

23

South West SHA

64

Other and Unknown

22

Total

1,970



3 Apr 2008 : Column 1297W

3 Apr 2008 : Column 1298W
Count of deliveries by drug dependent mothers for the period 2002-03 to 2006-07 by diagnosis code and type of drug used
Total finished consultant delivery episodes
Diagnosis code Type of drug 2006-07 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 2002-03

F10.2

Alcohol

82

62

50

31

22

F11.2

Opioids

1,059

1,014

946

772

535

F12.2

Cannabinoids

100

93

81

52

19

F13.2

Sedatives or hypnotics

*

8

12

*

*

F14.2

Cocaine

32

47

32

33

25

F15.2

Other stimulants including Caffeine

27

10

9

11

*

F16.2

Hallucinogens

16

13

8

8

14

F17.2

Tobacco

641

748

606

564

440

F18.2

Volatile solvents

*

0

0

*

0

F19.2

Multiple drug use

61

32

41

27

18

Total(1)

1,970

1,956

1,741

1,460

1,057

(1 )For all years the total number of cases is higher when looking at the yearly total broken down by drug use compared to the yearly figure broken down by region. This is because there will be several cases where the mother has been diagnosed as using more than one type of drug and those drugs have been recognised. International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis code F19.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to multiple drug use and use of other psychoactive substances is only used when patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate or when the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed.
Coverage and data quality:
The maternity tail data coverage is not as complete as the rest of HES data. There are a number of reasons for the coverage and data quality issues such as:
trusts submitting a significantly higher number of delivery episodes compared to birth episodes;
trusts failing to submit data on the number of birth episodes where they record a high number of delivery episodes;
trusts failing to submit delivery—the reason for this is that approximately 20 trusts have a stand alone maternity system which is not linked to the Patient Administration System;
trusts identifying a high number of maternity beds available, but not recording any information about deliveries or births;
trusts identifying that they have no maternity beds available, but recording a high number of birth and delivery episodes; and
some trusts have space in their maternity system to record nine birth tails, whereas other systems have space for 18. As deliveries, miscarriages and abortions are all recorded in the birth tail, there are cases where nine tails is not enough to record all of the relevant data.
Between 2001-02 and 2005-06, coverage of hospital deliveries was 72.6 per cent. on average, whereas that of home deliveries was 13.6 per cent. on average. The incomplete coverage problem is significantly compounded by the data quality issues outlined above.
Assessing growth through time:
HES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. During the years that these records have been collected the NHS there have been ongoing improvements in quality and coverage. These improvements in information submitted by the NHS have been particularly marked in the earlier years and need to be borne in mind when analysing time series.
Some of the increase in figures for later years (particularly 2006-07 onwards) may be due to the improvement in the coverage of independent sector activity.
Changes in NHS practice also need to be borne in mind when analysing time series. For example a number of procedures may now be undertaken in out-patient settings and may no longer be accounted in the HES data. This may account for any reductions in activity over time.
Finished Consultant Episode (FCE):
A FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. The figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.
Secondary Diagnoses:
As well as the primary diagnosis, there are up to 13 (6 prior to 2002-03) secondary diagnosis fields in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) that show other diagnoses relevant to the episode of care.
ICD-10 code used:
Z37. Outcome of delivery (must always been found in the first secondary position)
All Diagnoses count of episodes:
These figures represent a count of all FCE’s where the diagnosis was mentioned in any of the 14 secondary (seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in a HES record.
ICD-10 diagnosis codes used (and must be accompanied by secondary diagnosis code):
F10.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of alcohol, dependence syndrome;
F11.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of opioids, dependence syndrome;
F12.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of cannabinoids, dependence syndrome;
F13.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of sedatives or hypnotics, dependence syndrome;
F14.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of cocaine, dependence syndrome;
F15.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of other stimulants, including caffeine, dependence syndrome;
F16.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of hallucinogens, dependence syndrome;
F17.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of tobacco, dependence syndrome;
F18.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of volatile solvents, dependence syndrome;
and
F19.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to multiple drug use and use of other psychoactive substances, dependence syndrome.
The codes indicate addiction to all types of drugs. For example F11.2 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of Opioids, would include addiction to Heroin and also Opioids found in prescription drugs.
Low Numbers:
Due to reasons of confidentiality, figures between one and five have been suppressed and replaced with ‘*’ (an asterisk). Where it was possible to identify numbers from the total due to a single suppressed number in a row or column, an additional smallest number have been suppressed in order to protect patient confidentiality.
Ungrossed Data:
Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (i.e. the data are ungrossed).
Source:
Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The Information Centre for Health and social care.

Next Section Index Home Page