Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Camerons speech contains disappointing echoes of the arguments of those who have long opposed any reform of the...public sector.
The speech and the motion could have been written at BMA headquarters.
The motion is accompanied by an equally ludicrous press release from Conservative central office, with the headline, Labours secret blueprint for polyclinics. The Tories claim to have uncovered guidance that amounted to a threat to family doctors services throughout the country. The only problem is that my fellow Health Minister, Lord Darzi, announced the guidance in a speech at a national conference in December and it has been publicly available on the Departments website ever since.
Far from being a threat to family doctors services, our plans will provide 265 new GP practices and GP-led health services throughout the country, on top of the existing 8,500 GP practices, with £250 million of new money. A new health centre that is open from 8 am until 8 pm, seven days a week, will be set up in every PCT area, and 103 new GP practices will be established in 50 of the least well-served areas of the country.
The public say that the ability to see a GP at a time that is more convenient to them is the one further improvement that they would like in the health service. With record investment going into GP surgeries, we on the Government Benches do not believe it unreasonable of the public to expect that improvement, and that is what our proposals will deliver.
It is extraordinary, although not surprising, that the Conservative party is aligning itself so firmly with the forces of conservatism against improving health services for the public. That might curry it some favour with the BMA, but most people can spot producer interest capture when they see it. What an astonishingand from our point of view welcomeset of affairs that the Conservatives should be positioning themselves so firmly on the wrong side of the health argument. That is why their motion will be defeated. I commend our amendment to the House.
Question put, That the original words stand part of the Question:
Question, That the proposed words be there added, put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 31 (Questions on amendments), and agreed to.
Madam Deputy Speaker forthwith declared the main Question, as amended, to be agreed to.
That this House welcomes the fact that the Government is providing £250 million, in addition to existing GP services, for 152 new state-of-the-art GP-led health centres open from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week; notes that these will offer a wide range of health services including prebookable GP appointments and walk-in services; further notes that where patients previously had trouble seeing their GP or had to make numerous visits to a variety of health professionals, they will now be able to see a doctor more quickly, collect their prescriptions, get their eyes tested, have a variety of diagnostic tests or see a physiotherapist in the same building and at times convenient to the patient; further welcomes the additional centrally funded 100 GP practices to be located in the most deprived areas which will have a strong focus on promoting health and reducing inequalities;
acknowledges the landmark agreement with GPs to extend surgery hours in evenings and on Saturdays and agrees that extended access will benefit hardworking families; further welcomes the extension of the role of pharmacies to be able to prescribe for and deal with minor ailments on the NHS, as well as promoting good health, supporting those with long-term conditions and preventing illnesses through additional screening and advice; recognises that the Government is on the side of patients; and agrees that extending access to GP services through extended hours and new GP health centres can have a real impact on health inequalities.
Madam Deputy Speaker (Sylvia Heal): I have to announce that Mr. Speaker has selected the amendment in the name of the Prime Minister.
Mr. David Ruffley (Bury St. Edmunds) (Con): I beg to move,
That this House supports the dedication of police officers in the City of London Police, the Metropolitan Police Service and the British Transport Police but notes the unacceptable trend in teenage murders in London, including the shocking figure of 27 murdered in 2007; believes that Londoners daily experience of crime, particularly lower level crime and anti-social behaviour, is now far removed from some official statistics; is deeply concerned that violent crime in London as measured by the British Crime Survey is the highest of all the regions in England and Wales and that fear of crime in London is now also the highest of all the regions in England and Wales; further notes the link between gun crime and drugs; further believes that local communities should be given greater freedom to direct the efforts of their police force if streets are to be made safer; and condemns the current Mayor of London for his complacent attitude to these serious crime issues.
London is the greatest city on earth. It is protected by the dedicated officers of the Metropolitan Police Service, the City of London police and the British Transport police, whom I have had the privilege of visiting during most of today. But it is also the city where the British Home Secretary, on her own admission, does not feel safe walking alone at night, and it is the city where 27 teenagers were murdered by other teenagers in 2007. Last month, a Labour Back Bencher, the hon. Member for Islington, South and Finsbury (Emily Thornberry), said I suspect that hardly any children in Islington have not been mugged at some stage.
London is the city where more teenagers are being mugged each year. The Metropolitan Police Service figuresnot the Home Office departmental figuresshow that the number of 11-to-22-year-olds reported to have been mugged in London rose from 19,276 in 2004-05 to 24,701 in 2006-07, an increase of 28 per cent. In Lewisham alone, 454 more muggings were recorded over the same period, an increase of 88.5 per cent. The Minister should note that those are Metropolitan Police Service figures.
According to the British crime survey, London has the highest level of violent crime among all the regions in England and Wales, and also the highest level of fear of crime. Londoners are twice as likely to be robbed as people in New York city. Violent crime has increased over eight years, according to official measurements of total violent crime and to measurements of violence against the person. The respective increases have been 15.3 per cent. and over 15 per cent. Those are the Mayors own figures. Robbery has increased by just under 20 per cent. in eight years. In 2007-08 there were more than 37,000 incidents of robbery in London. Those too are the Mayors own figures. The number of sexual offences was greater in 2007 than in 1999 to 2000, according to Metropolitan Police Service figures.
Mr. Andrew Love (Edmonton) (Lab/Co-op): The hon. Gentleman has quoted Metropolitan Police Service figures. Does he accept that violent crime has fallen by 8 per cent. in the last year, also according to Metropolitan Police Service figures?
Mr. Ruffley: No, I do not, because of the statistics that I have just read out. The hon. Gentleman really ought to spend a bit more time listening and a bit less time mouthing off. If he reads Hansard tomorrow, he will see why he is wrong. Those statistics show beyond peradventure that violent crime is on the up in the capital.
Mr. John Randall (Uxbridge) (Con): I am sure that my hon. Friend has not had time yet to read todays Uxbridge Gazette, but when he does, he will find out that Hillingdon has Londons third highest daily crime rate, and in the last year there were 6,925 violent crimesor 19 a dayin that borough alone. Does he think that that is acceptable?
Mr. Ruffley: No, I do not. That is a reproach to the hon. Member for Edmonton (Mr. Love) who, when we debated the issue of crime in London last month, came up with the same selective nonsense as he did a few moments ago.
Mr. David Burrowes (Enfield, Southgate) (Con): Following the intervention by my neighbour, my hon. Friend the Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Randall), we cannot be complacent about violent crime, given that there have been five murders in Edmonton since Christmas and that London has the highest levels of fear of crimeaccording to Government figures.
Mr. Ruffley: I entirely agree with my hon. Friend, and Labour Members should stop being so complacent. We can celebrate the dedication and hard work of London police officers, but let us not pretend that there is not a problem with crime.
Daniel Kawczynski (Shrewsbury and Atcham) (Con): My hon. Friend mentions police officers. Will he join me in thanking the police officers who protect us here in the House of Commons? They do a tremendous job. Does he also agree that more needs to be done to ensure that everyone respects police officers more?
Mr. Ruffley: I agree, and statistics show that offences against and assaults on police officers have risen in the past 10 years. That is a cause for concern and something must be done. That emphasises our point that there is more violence about, and whether it is against civilians or police officers, it is utterly unacceptable in London. Labour Members are way too complacent about that.
Mr. David Evennett (Bexleyheath and Crayford) (Con): My hon. Friend is making a powerful and effective case[Hon. Members: No, hes not.] Labour Members do not like to hear the truth. My hon. Friend has highlighted the real problem. In my area of south-east London, there is a real and growing fear of crime. People know that violent crime is increasing and they want a new approach.
Mr. Ruffley: They want a new approach and they also want the Government to accept that, according to the British crime survey, fear of crime is higher in London than in any other region in England and Wales. That is a fact.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |