Previous Section Index Home Page

23 Apr 2008 : Column 2101W—continued


Schools: Sustainable Development

Gregory Barker: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the number of schools that use (a) occupancy/daylight saving light sensors, (b) infra-red operated faucets, (c) fully condensing boilers, (d) underfloor heating and (e) rainwater harvesting systems. [200308]

Jim Knight: We do not hold information on the numbers of schools that have installed (a) occupancy/daylight saving light sensors, (b) infra-red operated faucets, (c) fully condensing boilers, (d) underfloor heating and (e) rainwater harvesting systems.

Investment in measures of this nature would typically be funded from budgets delegated to schools and local authorities. This information may be held at a local authority or school level.

Schools: Water

Gregory Barker: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much was spent by schools on water services in (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003, (d) 2004, (e) 2005, (f) 2006 and (g) 2007. [200309]

Jim Knight: The information about expenditure by local authority maintained schools in England on water and sewage for 2002-03 to 2006-07 is contained within the following table:


23 Apr 2008 : Column 2102W
Expenditure by local authority maintained schools on water and sewerage (E15)
£

2002-03

61,717,000

2003-04

65,815,000

2004-05

68,549,000

2005-06

78,139,000

2006-07

83,846,000


Gregory Barker: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much waste water was produced by schools in (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003, (d) 2004, (e) 2005, (f) 2006 and (g) 2007. [200311]

Jim Knight: Waste water produced by schools cannot be accurately quantified because it is not metered. It is normally assumed that all water supplied to a school is retuned to sewers as waste water, although the actual volume of waste water is slightly less than that supplied, the difference being due to small volumes of water used for irrigation on school sites and/or evaporation from swimming pools.

The Department does not have information on the total water supplied to all schools in England. However, we have gathered benchmarking information on water use for the years 2001 to 2006 for a sample of schools. This has been analysed to determine average water use per pupil as summarised in the following table.

Average annual water consumption (cu.m/pupil)
Primary Secondary
Nursery With pool Without pool With pool Without pool

2000/01

3.41

4.31

3.80

5.08

3.86

2001/02

4.28

4.35

4.03

5.06

3.96

2002/03

4.21

4.48

4.02

5.08

3.82

2003/04

3.50

5.16

3.99

5.08

3.70

2004/05

3.52

4.95

4.08

4.89

3.75

2005/06

3.71

4.91

4.11

5.39

3.75


Secondary Education: Assessments

Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families in how many schools more than 50 per cent. of pupils did not gain level 5 or above in a combination of reading, writing and mathematics tests at key stage three in the last year for which figures are available. [200330]

Jim Knight: The information can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Secondary Education: Teaching Methods

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families by what date he expects every secondary school child to have a personal tutor; and if he will make a statement. [201061]

Jim Knight: Our expectation, as described in the Children’s Plan, is that all secondary school pupils will have access to a personal tutor from 2010.


23 Apr 2008 : Column 2103W

Teachers: Qualifications

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many people employed as teachers in Milton Keynes Local Education Authority area have only qualifications obtained abroad. [200766]

Jim Knight: The information requested is not collected centrally.

Textbooks

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what his policy is on allowing pupils to take school textbooks home. [200314]

Jim Knight: It is for schools to decide whether or not pupils should take textbooks home from school.

Communities and Local Government

Allotments: Finance

Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the funding provided for allotments; what mechanisms are in place to assess the effectiveness of allotment funding against its objectives; and if she will make a statement. [200393]

Mr. Iain Wright: Funding for allotments is available through the financial support that all local authorities receive from central Government. It is up to local authorities to ensure that adequate funding is in place for allotments according to their local needs, and to assess the effectiveness of their funding. As this should be a local responsibility, based on specific local circumstances the Secretary of State has not made any assessment of the effectiveness of funding provided for allotments.

Building Regulations: Public Participation

Mary Creagh: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she expects to launch a public consultation on amendments to the Building Regulations; and whether such consultations will include proposed revisions to regulations regarding hot water and safety. [200394]

Mr. Iain Wright: We anticipate that public consultation on possible amendments to Part G of the Building Regulations will be published in the next few weeks. This consultation will consider the issue of hot water safety alongside other issues.

Conference Centres: Finance

Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether her Department provides any (a) capital and (b) revenue support to any conference or exhibition centre; and if she will make a statement. [199435]


23 Apr 2008 : Column 2104W

Mr. Iain Wright: The Department sponsors the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre (QEIICC) in Westminster, an Executive agency with Trading Fund status. The QEIICC trading fund is required to cover all its expenditure from income from room hire and other activities and pay the Department an annual dividend to cover the cost of capital charge incurred by the Department. In 2006-07, the QEIICC trading fund generated income of £10.4 million on its operating activities. The Department retains landlord responsibility for the QEIICC building, and undertakes capital expenditure on the building as and when it is deemed to be necessary. In 2006-07, the Department incurred capital expenditure of £0.985 million mainly in respect of replacement air-handling units.

Council Tax: Students

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether doctoral postgraduate students during their six month thesis write up stage are classed as full-time students and eligible for a council tax exemption. [198921]

John Healey: The definition of a student for council tax purposes is set out in the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and the Council Tax (Discounts Disregards) Order 1992. It is for each individual local authority to decide who is classed as a student and in doing so to satisfy itself that the legislative requirements have been met before granting a student exemption from council tax.

Council Tax: Tax Yields

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the Answer to the hon. Member for Bromley of 5 March 2008, Official Report, column 2498W, on council tax: tax yields, when the data for 2007-08 will be available. [199267]

John Healey: The data will be available in June 2008 following the publication of the Statistical Release “Collection rates for council tax and non-domestic rates in England—2007-08”.

Departmental ICT

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the (a) start date, (b) original planned completion date, (c) current expected completion date, (d) planned cost and (e) current estimated cost is for each information technology project being undertaken by her Department and its agencies; and if she will make a statement. [180580]

Mr. Dhanda: IT projects(1) undertaken by Communities and Local Government (CLG) and its Agencies are as shown in the table.

Communities and Local Government (including regional co-ordination unit and Government offices in the regions)
Project Start date Original planned completion date Expected completion date Originally planned costs (£000) Estimated planned costs (£000)

Website Rationalisation (incorporating Info4local Rebuild project)(1)

December 2005

June 2008

December 2008

3,200

(2)3,600

Fire Incident Recording System

January 2006

December 2006

March 2008

1,300

2,990

LINK (New corporate desktop system)

February 2005

October 2006

February 2008

2,064

2,064

EDRMS

October 2006

December 2006

June 2008

699

699

Replacement Infrastructure for Peoplesoft HR System

November 2006

May 2007

March 2008

537

537

CLG Payroll Replacement System

May 2007

March 2008

March 2008

382

382

SAP Implementing Benefits

January 2008

February 2009

February 2009

364

364

Smarter Business Process (SAP Enhancement)

September 2007

April 2008

August 2008

350

350

Blackberry Service

July 2007

April 2008

April 2008

239

239

Government Offices Human Resources Database, further development

April 2007

March 2008

March 2008

150

176

Government Offices Online Performance Management System, further development

April 2007

March 2008

March 2008

150

150

(b) Agencies of the Department

Planning Inspectorate

Fast-track Householder Appeal Service—Stage 1 (Validation and Planning)

September 2007

December 2007

February 2008

130

130

Server Virtualisation Project

October 2007

March 2008

March 2008

105

105

Programme and Project Management Tool (Hydra)

March 2007

October 2007

February 2008

95

95

Fire Service College

Fire Service College Managed Learning System(3)

January 2006

April 2007

May 2008

5,500

5,500

QEII Conference Centre

Meeting Matrix

June 2007

September 2007

February 2008

65

65

(1) A project to rebuild the Info41ocal website was approved in November 2004 at a cost of £244,000. The project was deferred for later incorporation into the Department’s Website Rationalisation Project.
(2) Plus £400 for Info41ocal.
(3) The FRS Managed Learning Environment referred to in the answer of 3 September 2007, Official Report, columns 1645-6W is the same project. The longer delivery timetable is the outcome of a college review of the business case for the project. It was decided the range of benefits from the project should be extended, resulting in more deliverables, and that more time should be allowed to implement the extended package. The costs figures given in that answer refer to the whole life costs for the project including operations costs following the transition into live operation.

Next Section Index Home Page